Police Chief says Officer Wilson will likely not be charged.

Sound police training doesn't train to shoot to wound stupid. LEO are trained to fire until the threat is suppressed. Now, granted in the military we were trained 2 in the chest 1 in the head, but regular police don't fire as often or train as hard as military police.


So police training is to be judge and jury? Who is stupid here? Police officers' duty is to apprehend and let the courts decide.

"...we in the military..." Oh fuck off, phony keyboard asshole.



Oh shut up with your stupid judge and jury crap. The guy attacked the cop then fled then attacked again. END OF STORY

Show the video of him attacking Wilson. Go ahead. Do it you stupid POS.

Forensics confirm that he attacked WIlson, stupid.
. . . But it doesn't confirm that it wasn't self-defense. If someone slammed a car door into you, what would you do?


I have always contended that there was some sort of altercation, the very first media reports described an incident inside the squad car.

What is important is what happened after Brown broke free. I believe, being that he was shot, he started to run, as Darien Johnson has stated. Most unarmed people being shot would run if they didn't surrender.

The problem is that the situation did not require Wilson to then kill Brown. His job was to apprehend and arrest with his back up officers who arrived just as Wilson decided to murder the kid. The first videos released clearly show Brown's body at least 35 feet away from Wilson's squad car where the fight occurred.
 
If it supports both sides. Then it does support Wilson's side you moron!

If you knew that you would have said it supported both sides. Why did you only claim it supported Wilsons story?

Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.

Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.

And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?

Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.

There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.

If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?

The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
 
None of these comments re the Mike Brown case matters. Nothing anyone says can change a few simple facts that continue to get overlooked.
One: All MB had to do was follow the officers request and get his ass OUT OF THE STREET!
Two: Sooner or later some cop, whether it was D.Wilson or some other poor cop working that area would have approached MB because he COMMITTED a strong arm robbery. MB had weed in his system as the autopsy report revealed. Its all over the news. Anyone familiar with marijuana sold in North StL knows that it is a very potent kind. I dont know what they do to it but the shit is way stronger than just "marijuana."
MB actions speak for themselves.
Officer Wilson deserves respect and an apology from all the assholes who accused him of murder. He was doing his job and he done nothing more.
As far as the protesters? GO HOME, get a job and become someone before you end up like MB! STOP ruining what is left of a used to be good and proud city.

Thank you Officer Wilson, may you and your family move forward, stay safe and be proud!


So police on the streets should be given the power of apprehension, arrest, arraignment, deciding charges, bail, then judge and jury.

Not getting out of the street does not give a cop the right to do any of the above except the first two.

Shooting an unarmed kid who is trying to run away does not give a police officer the right to do anything except, again the first two.

 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg
 
If you knew that you would have said it supported both sides. Why did you only claim it supported Wilsons story?

Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.

Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.

And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?

Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.

There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.

If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?

The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.
 
None of these comments re the Mike Brown case matters. Nothing anyone says can change a few simple facts that continue to get overlooked.
One: All MB had to do was follow the officers request and get his ass OUT OF THE STREET!
Two: Sooner or later some cop, whether it was D.Wilson or some other poor cop working that area would have approached MB because he COMMITTED a strong arm robbery. MB had weed in his system as the autopsy report revealed. Its all over the news. Anyone familiar with marijuana sold in North StL knows that it is a very potent kind. I dont know what they do to it but the shit is way stronger than just "marijuana."
MB actions speak for themselves.
Officer Wilson deserves respect and an apology from all the assholes who accused him of murder. He was doing his job and he done nothing more.
As far as the protesters? GO HOME, get a job and become someone before you end up like MB! STOP ruining what is left of a used to be good and proud city.

Thank you Officer Wilson, may you and your family move forward, stay safe and be proud!


So police on the streets should be given the power of apprehension, arrest, arraignment, deciding charges, bail, then judge and jury.

Not getting out of the street does not give a cop the right to do any of the above except the first two.

Shooting an unarmed kid who is trying to run away does not give a police officer the right to do anything except, again the first two.
Do you have tunnel vision or something?
 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg

Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.
 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg

Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.

CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.
 
This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.

Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post

The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.

That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.

You just now became aware of this story ?
 
Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.

Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.

And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?

Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.

There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.

If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?

The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.

You are a walking contradiction.
 
Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.

Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.

And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?

Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.

There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.

If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?

The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.

You are a walking contradiction.
Says the convict.
 
This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.

Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post

The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.

That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.

You just now became aware of this story ?
Yes.
 
This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.

Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post

The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.

That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.

You just now became aware of this story ?

You'll have to forgive him,he's kinda special.....
 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg

Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.

CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.

Yep....you have tunnel vision
 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg

Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.

CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.

Yep....you have tunnel vision
That's what I would say if I could not dispute the post too. Please explain how being shot in the hand at the car supports that Brown was not surrendering after running away, then stopping and turning around with his hands up as all the eyewitnesses testify to. This should be interesting.
 
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis

Lets use a little intelligence here.

Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.

Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson

SUB-JP-BROWN-2-master495.jpg

Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.

CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.

Yep....you have tunnel vision
That's what I would say if I could not dispute the post too. Please explain how being shot in the hand at the car supports that Brown was not surrendering after running away, then stopping and turning around with his hands up as all the eyewitnesses testify to. This should be interesting.

Some eyewitnesses said he was shot in the back. We know that wasn't true. Witnesses lie or sometimes gets things wrong.

In an interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the eyewitness recalled four key details:
• After an initial scuffle in the car, the officer did not fire until Brown turned back toward him.
• Brown put his arms out to his sides but never raised his hands high.
• Brown staggered toward Wilson despite commands to stop.
• The two were about 20 to 25 feet apart when the last shots were fired.

New Claims Made by Grand Jury Witness Who Says He Saw Shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson From Start to Finish TheBlaze.com
 
This just shows the mentality of some people.

It s murder and they will feel and see the wrath of God s vengeance Michael Brown s family react angrily to leak of Darren Wilson s testimony Daily Mail Online

I suppose we should just let thugs go around committing strong arm robberies, attacking cops, etc etc....blah blah. Boohoo for the poor blacks who just dont get it. BRING IT ON.....we're ready!
Really fucking tired of all the BS

If Wilson isn't charged it could get really ugly. Imagine the pressure the Grand Jury and the prosecutor are feeling right now. I'm betting they wished he was guilty as sin, so they could indict and wash their hands of the case.
Now it seems more likely than not, that he won't be charged, and the town could burn.
 

Forum List

Back
Top