- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,090
- 69,728
Seems racism is your thing lately.Is there a threshold for racism that will get people banned from this forum?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems racism is your thing lately.Is there a threshold for racism that will get people banned from this forum?
. . . But it doesn't confirm that it wasn't self-defense. If someone slammed a car door into you, what would you do?Sound police training doesn't train to shoot to wound stupid. LEO are trained to fire until the threat is suppressed. Now, granted in the military we were trained 2 in the chest 1 in the head, but regular police don't fire as often or train as hard as military police.
So police training is to be judge and jury? Who is stupid here? Police officers' duty is to apprehend and let the courts decide.
"...we in the military..." Oh fuck off, phony keyboard asshole.
Oh shut up with your stupid judge and jury crap. The guy attacked the cop then fled then attacked again. END OF STORY
Show the video of him attacking Wilson. Go ahead. Do it you stupid POS.
Forensics confirm that he attacked WIlson, stupid.
Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.If it supports both sides. Then it does support Wilson's side you moron!
If you knew that you would have said it supported both sides. Why did you only claim it supported Wilsons story?
Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.
And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?
Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.
There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.
None of these comments re the Mike Brown case matters. Nothing anyone says can change a few simple facts that continue to get overlooked.
One: All MB had to do was follow the officers request and get his ass OUT OF THE STREET!
Two: Sooner or later some cop, whether it was D.Wilson or some other poor cop working that area would have approached MB because he COMMITTED a strong arm robbery. MB had weed in his system as the autopsy report revealed. Its all over the news. Anyone familiar with marijuana sold in North StL knows that it is a very potent kind. I dont know what they do to it but the shit is way stronger than just "marijuana."
MB actions speak for themselves.
Officer Wilson deserves respect and an apology from all the assholes who accused him of murder. He was doing his job and he done nothing more.
As far as the protesters? GO HOME, get a job and become someone before you end up like MB! STOP ruining what is left of a used to be good and proud city.
Thank you Officer Wilson, may you and your family move forward, stay safe and be proud!
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.If you knew that you would have said it supported both sides. Why did you only claim it supported Wilsons story?
Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.
And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?
Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.
There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.
If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?
The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
Do you have tunnel vision or something?None of these comments re the Mike Brown case matters. Nothing anyone says can change a few simple facts that continue to get overlooked.
One: All MB had to do was follow the officers request and get his ass OUT OF THE STREET!
Two: Sooner or later some cop, whether it was D.Wilson or some other poor cop working that area would have approached MB because he COMMITTED a strong arm robbery. MB had weed in his system as the autopsy report revealed. Its all over the news. Anyone familiar with marijuana sold in North StL knows that it is a very potent kind. I dont know what they do to it but the shit is way stronger than just "marijuana."
MB actions speak for themselves.
Officer Wilson deserves respect and an apology from all the assholes who accused him of murder. He was doing his job and he done nothing more.
As far as the protesters? GO HOME, get a job and become someone before you end up like MB! STOP ruining what is left of a used to be good and proud city.
Thank you Officer Wilson, may you and your family move forward, stay safe and be proud!
So police on the streets should be given the power of apprehension, arrest, arraignment, deciding charges, bail, then judge and jury.
Not getting out of the street does not give a cop the right to do any of the above except the first two.
Shooting an unarmed kid who is trying to run away does not give a police officer the right to do anything except, again the first two.
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
Lets use a little intelligence here.
Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.
Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson
![]()
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
Lets use a little intelligence here.
Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.
Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson
![]()
Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.
This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.
Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post
The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.
That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.
The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.Because the topic is about Wilson and his account of events.
Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.
And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?
Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.
There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.
If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?
The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
Says the convict.The evidence doesnt suggest anything other than facts. Your interpretation is what does the suggesting. The evidence does nothing but agree with both sides of the events.Thats a dumb reason to only say it supported Wilson's account when it didnt.
Did I say "only"? No I didn't . You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it.
And yes it does support Wilson, why else would they say he will not likely be charged if the evidence didn't support him?
Your omission that it also supports the other side speaks volumes. Glad I was able to point that out to you.
There could be a number of reasons why they say it. They dont want to get sued. They dont want Wilson to go to trial to name 2 off the top of my head. Both very strong reasons.
If the evidence suggests he did something wrong, why wouldn't they want him to go to trial and who would be sued if he did stand trial?
The fact the evidence supports Wilson makes more sense not to try Wilson than any bullshit reason you can pull out of your ass.
You are a walking contradiction.
Yes.This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.
Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post
The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.
That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.
You just now became aware of this story ?
This is pretty interesting. Wilson was fired from a corrupt racist police department about 3 years prior to this incident.
Darren Wilson s first job was on a troubled police force disbanded by authorities - The Washington Post
The small city of Jennings, Mo., had a police department so troubled, and with so much tension between white officers and black residents, that the city council finally decided to disband it. Everyone in the Jennings police department was fired. New officers were brought in to create a credible department from scratch.
That was three years ago. One of the officers who worked in that department, and lost his job along with everyone else, was a young man named Darren Wilson.
You just now became aware of this story ?
A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
Lets use a little intelligence here.
Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.
Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson
![]()
Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.
CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.
That's what I would say if I could not dispute the post too. Please explain how being shot in the hand at the car supports that Brown was not surrendering after running away, then stopping and turning around with his hands up as all the eyewitnesses testify to. This should be interesting.A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
Lets use a little intelligence here.
Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.
Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson
![]()
Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.
CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.
Yep....you have tunnel vision
That's what I would say if I could not dispute the post too. Please explain how being shot in the hand at the car supports that Brown was not surrendering after running away, then stopping and turning around with his hands up as all the eyewitnesses testify to. This should be interesting.A little more for the Dirt Nap Mike was a good boy crowd...
New Information Released on Michael Brown Case CBS St. Louis
Lets use a little intelligence here.
Brown was shot only once in the hand which makes sense.
Brown jerked and stopped after he ran which accounts for the wound not facing Wilson
![]()
Okay Mr chief Coroner and medical examiner.
Just give it up. Even CBS is trying to break it to you softly...just go with it before you make yourself look even du......just go with it.
CBS is not trying to break anything to me. Once the Fergusen PD closed ranks and with held information I knew what would be the result. That doesnt mean I have to be a sheep like you and actually help them by claiming a shot in the hand during the struggle in the car is proof he was not surrendering when Wilson gunned him down. Only a idiot or a racist would fall for that logic. BTW no I will not give it up. I will continue to stress you out by pointing out your flaws in logic and the interpretation of the evidence.
Yep....you have tunnel vision
This just shows the mentality of some people.
It s murder and they will feel and see the wrath of God s vengeance Michael Brown s family react angrily to leak of Darren Wilson s testimony Daily Mail Online
I suppose we should just let thugs go around committing strong arm robberies, attacking cops, etc etc....blah blah. Boohoo for the poor blacks who just dont get it. BRING IT ON.....we're ready!
Really fucking tired of all the BS