Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?

[rightwinger]

WE
LIBERALS wrote the Constitution

Wrong. THEY wrote it, and commies like you want to claim credit for it. Have you no shame?

LIBERALS my friend
What have American LIBERALS given us?

The Constitution
Abolition of slavery
Worker rights
Womens rights
Civil Rights
Environmental Protections
ADA
Gay Rights

Conservatives fought against every one of them

You only prove that there is no limit to the lies you're willing to spew.

Show me ONE of those rights I posted that were pushed by Conservatives

Most of them aren't rights. they are privileges invented by leftists.

No, they are rights
The Courts have affirmed them

 

[bripat9643]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

The first sentence is explanatory. It has no legal implications.

You claimed you support the Constitution, not prove it.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you agree with?

 

[progressive hunter]

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

The 2nd amendment is a single sentence, meaning it's to be interpreted as a sentence.
Why do you keep leaving out the first half.

the first half claifies the second and has no power ,,

 

[Rigby5]

The “All MEN are created equal” part. That could use some updating.

and yet you dont say what could be updated,,

“All MEN are created equal”, leaves out women obviously.
Although in theory men refers to mankind, which does include all women.
Just seems better to be more explicit.

 

[bripat9643]

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

The 2nd amendment is a single sentence, meaning it's to be interpreted as a sentence.
Why do you keep leaving out the first half.

Because it's purely explanatory. It has no legal implications.

Now, do you support "shall not be infringed" or not?

 

[meaner gene]

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

You mean like where the constitution says that the USSC determines its interpretation?

 

[progressive hunter]

The “All MEN are created equal” part. That could use some updating.

and yet you dont say what could be updated,,

It leaves out women obviously.
Although in theory men refers to mankind, which does include all women.
Just seems better to be more explicit.

using man/men has been known for centuries as an all inclusive term,,

do try and keep up,,

 

[bripat9643]

WE
LIBERALS wrote the Constitution

Wrong. THEY wrote it, and commies like you want to claim credit for it. Have you no shame?

LIBERALS my friend
What have American LIBERALS given us?

The Constitution
Abolition of slavery
Worker rights
Womens rights
Civil Rights
Environmental Protections
ADA
Gay Rights

Conservatives fought against every one of them

You only prove that there is no limit to the lies you're willing to spew.

Show me ONE of those rights I posted that were pushed by Conservatives

Most of them aren't rights. they are privileges invented by leftists.

No, they are rights
The Courts have affirmed them

The courts ruled incorrectly. They are infringements on our rights.

 

[Crepitus]

Pelosi's bill attempting to change the way a State decides to hold their elections by Federalizing elections.

This is a lie.

The constitution gives congress that power. So what's the problem. It's promulgating equal protection. Where you have the same basic voting rights in every state for a federal election. States are still free to set whatever rules they want for local elections, including completely eliminating them.

The constitution says the state legislatures will run elections, not Congress.

Once again, you only prove that you despise the Constitution.

That's not true in the way you are assuming it is, because you've just been told about it instead of reading it for yourself.

Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

 

[progressive hunter]

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

You mean like where the constitution says that the USSC determines its interpretation?

it doesnt say that,,

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Lefties hate the constitution and they want it destroyed or changed.

Another lie.

For decades liberals have used Constitutional case law to defend against the right’s attack on citizens’ rights and protected liberties.

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

Conservatives hate the Constitution because its case law prevents the authoritarian right from disadvantaging those whom conservatives fear and hate.

Conservatives seek to violate the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay and transgender Americans, the due process rights of immigrants, the freedom of association rights of social media, and the voting rights of minority Americans.

Conservatives even have contempt for current Second Amendment case law.

 

[bripat9643]

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

You mean like where the constitution says that the USSC determines its interpretation?

It doesn't say that, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Lefties hate the constitution and they want it destroyed or changed.

Another lie.

For decades liberals have used Constitutional case law to defend against the right’s attack on citizens’ rights and protected liberties.

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

Conservatives hate the Constitution because its case law prevents the authoritarian right from disadvantaging those whom conservatives fear and hate.

Conservatives seek to violate the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay and transgender Americans, the due process rights of immigrants, the freedom of association rights of social media, and the voting rights of minority Americans.

Conservatives even have contempt for current Second Amendment case law.

Case law was something invented by activist judges on the court. It's bullshit.

 

[progressive hunter]

Lefties hate the constitution and they want it destroyed or changed.

Another lie.

For decades liberals have used Constitutional case law to defend against the right’s attack on citizens’ rights and protected liberties.

You mean they used case law to destroy the Constitution.

Conservatives hate the Constitution because its case law prevents the authoritarian right from disadvantaging those whom conservatives fear and hate.

Conservatives seek to violate the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay and transgender Americans, the due process rights of immigrants, the freedom of association rights of social media, and the voting rights of minority Americans.

Conservatives even have contempt for current Second Amendment case law.

case law is the tactic progressives use to undermine the constitution and has no place when its the subject,,

 

[Crepitus]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

where does the 2nd say you have to be in a militia??

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

 

[bripat9643]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

where does the 2nd say you have to be in a militia??

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

 

[progressive hunter]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

where does the 2nd say you have to be in a militia??

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

so it doesnt and you lied,,

 

[rightwinger]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

democrats are not liberals,,

99 percent are

 

[progressive hunter]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

where does the 2nd say you have to be in a militia??

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

You've just proven yourself too stupid to participate in this thread.

Get lost.

he says shit like that when he knows hes wrong ,,

 

[Crepitus]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

The first sentence is explanatory. It has no legal implications.

You claimed you support the Constitution, not prove it.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you agree with?

The first sentence iss explanatory? Who told you that nonsense?