Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
31st March 2016,
Mississippi has passed the most anti-LGBT legislation to date and the Governor has indicated that he’ll sign it....It states that it’s acceptable to discriminate someone who identifies as LGBT, if the view is held that marriage should only be between a man and a woman, sex should only happen in marriage and male and female refer only to someone’s anatomy...
Maddow herself even admitted her show had been targeting governors. (duly elected by the tens of millions precisely for the views Maddow objected to and hence the targeting..) That's sedition after the fact in my book.
Looks like Mississippi jumped on board to demonstrate that their state isn't going to have itself bullied either. Maddow needs to understand that actions bring swift repercussions sometimes..the South protects its own..
Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date
31st March 2016,
Mississippi has passed the most anti-LGBT legislation to date and the Governor has indicated that he’ll sign it....It states that it’s acceptable to discriminate someone who identifies as LGBT, if the view is held that marriage should only be between a man and a woman, sex should only happen in marriage and male and female refer only to someone’s anatomy...
First there's this report, posted March 24, 2016 from which Maddow launches one of her trademark hypocritical "sex scandal" hits on a GOP politician. (Remember, she's for open and free sexual expression otherwise)...
The alleged "smoking gun" sex tape putting crosshairs this time on the Alabama Governor (cue 3:48) is so garbled and incoherent that Maddow presents as her "shocking" "evidence" that it's a wonder how her producers gave her the green light on this.
But bear in mind, she prefaced the hit piece with a statement that this governor has an anti-gay stance...so...you know...gloves off... Listen to the tone of her voice and its inflection as she announces what I believe to be the core of her willingness to use her show as a platform to attempt to unseat yet another GOP governor: (cue 7:37-8:42) And, bearing in mind that Ms. Maddow is all about the "free love" utopia, she has the hubris and audacity to say that the Gov of Alabama should be taken down because of his...hypocrisy... You can't make this stuff up:
Then there's this from the Maddow Show about GOP candidate (potentially president) Ted Cruz alleged mistress scandal *Updated* – The National Enquirer Runs Story of Multiple Ted Cruz Affairs…:
*Nothing*...
Could it be that Maddow uses selective sex scandals to laser-point her hits on targets who only get in the way of the Gay Agenda? Why wouldn't she attack Ted Cruz? Surely he is more visible than the Alabama Governor right now? And the evidence for each (Alabama Gov. & Ted Cruz) alleged sex scandal holds roughly the same credible viability (mostly highly-suspect rumor and little fact). In the case of Alabama, a guy the governor just fired "as key witness" (getting even?). With Cruz, interviews with numerous call-girls. So why not Ted Cruz?
A simple explanation might be that Maddow is hoping either Tiny Hands or Cruz get the GOP nomination: because she believes neither of them would prevail against Hillary. In other words, she believes neither of them would prevail against the Gay Agenda. Ah, so there might be the explanation for her weird silence on the Ted Cruz allegations... Why knock out the candidate you know will lose against yours? She's almost certainly seen Cruz's Canadian birth certificate. He can be excised later at the right and precise moment for a left-victory.
I could be wrong. I used Google and came up with nothing on Maddow confronting the Ted Cruz sex scandal rumors. If any of you have Maddow covering that, post a link, OK? Otherwise it is beginning to look like MSNBC anchor Rachael Maddow is less than an "equal-coverage" journalist and more like a sharpshooting political assassin working for an Agenda...
For one I found this.
Did Rachel Maddow Stumble Last Year Across a Key Piece of Evidence of Hush Money Paid in the #CruzSexScandal?
And I'd like to see the Maddow Show do a follow up on it. Maddow uncovered this around August 2015. Since then has anyone heard her follow up? Recent re-bubblings of these allegations are popping up everywhere. But where is the famous "if it's sex and scandal and GOP I'm covering it!" Maddow segment on Cruz's alleged infidelities recently?
August, 2015...There is speculation that a Ted Cruz related SuperPAC may have paid hush money last year to the Carly Fiorina campaign to keep it from disclosing a Cruz sex scandal.
..One name emerging is Amanda Carpenter, though, she has denied any sexual involvement with Cruz.
..Last August, Rachel Maddow devoted an entire segment to reporting on the odd payment. Could she have stumbled on to a key piece of hush money Did Rachel Maddow Stumble Last Year Across A Key Piece Of Evidence Of Hush Money Paid In The #CruzSexScandal? | NewZSentinel
Rachael's good at what she does, when properly motivated. Just ask the Governor of Virginia who made the mistake of coming out against gay marriage just before the Maddow Show began heavy coverage on getting him removed from office..
She's a Loopy kunt and should be pistol whipped in her sleep for being so ugly both on the inside and outside - I did not think it was possible for a person of her ilk to be uglier on the inside then the outside. Lol
Not to mention she's as dumb as a bag of hammers...
She may be book smart Rhodes kind of way, that certainly doesn't mean she has any common sense. Na, she's a delusional loopy kunt who has an identity crisis...She's a Loopy kunt and should be pistol whipped in her sleep for being so ugly both on the inside and outside - I did not think it was possible for a person of her ilk to be uglier on the inside then the outside. Lol
Not to mention she's as dumb as a bag of hammers...
Not sure about all that. She isn't dumb; far from it. But what she is, is apparently engaged in removing the power of the vote of tens of millions of people who knew what those governors stood for on marriage when they duly elected them. If "dumb" people can successfully damage or dethrone what...five..six governors now?...then God help us if someone really clever gets them in their political crosshairs..
Well, agreed on the identity crisis thing. Her show last night wouldn't let it's grip around the Gov of Alabama (& by logical extension the millions who voted him into office)'s neck go. Though I think she's also having an "interpretation crisis". It was a bit about how terrible it was of a photo op for the Gov to be visiting a prison and showing himself walking around with cameras strategically placed behind bars looking out at him. It might have been more of a message to her than a statement about him. Active sedition, should the GOP prevail, that has removed or harmed what 5 or 6 sitting governors now for petty issues that didn't and don't rise to their removal from office, is going to be a matter that may come back to bite Maddow in the ass. No wonder she's giving an obvious nudge to either Ted Cruz or Tiny Hands and always speaks about Kasich chances with derision: "no mathematical chance!"....at this point her very career may hinge on whether or not she can get the GOP to appoint another Rove-loser.
Kasich beats Hillary in the general by 11 points. Probably Sanders by 15...
Things change Skylar. Your group is all about change right?
Federal judge overturns Mississippi adoption ban for same-sex couples
Federal judge overturns Mississippi adoption ban for same-sex couples | Fox News
Your high-powered rifle just got jammed by 2016 election politics.
The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC
^^ Cue 1:20 She with a large vendetta and no small penchant for tyranny now threatens to beat the drum of withdrawing federal funds to Mississippi and NC if they don't get on board with the LGBT cult. (Who elected Maddow president again?)
However, this is an election year. Any such action by the Fed under Obama would be a death sentence to any hopeful democrat candidate. It isn't just the people of Mississippi or NC watching, it's the rest of the 90% of the country who believes both a mother and father are "important" to a child (which cannot exist in the same mind with support for gay marriage without a fundamental and shattering paradox): A Poll Businesses Boycotting Laws Protecting Christians Might Want To Look At First..
Taking away the entire South's rebel flag by LGBT activism riding the coattails artificially of a "racial movement" (the gay kid who gunned down the 9 Christians in NC the day after a major southern church announced it would never support gay marriage, had a black boyfriend...so...yeah..that wasn't about race..) is one thing. Taking away the entire country's right "by Federal punitive example" to enact laws to protect Christians' rights to passively refuse to pay homage to the LGBT altar is quite another. Check out the link. 90% of silent empathy for Mississippi and NC's new laws is a mighty impressive number for the DNC to gamble with... Sorry Miss Maddow
It's an election year.
Obama is tied to the hip to Hillary. If the dems want a whit of a chance of succeeding, they'd do well to not give the 90% of the American public who believe it's important for a child to have both a mother and father the idea that Dems=fiscal punishment for folks that feel that way..
Another one of your moronic claims.You do know her show's satire right? Satire never made a difference to any government anywhere.
Why is discussing a prominent news story about a governor 'usurping democracy'? Or 'acting like a dictator'. Or 'unseating a governor'?
It is usurping democracy when one uses a rifle and not a hand grenade. She is ...pay attention here Skylar...selectively assassinating political careers ONLY on the opposite party of herself, .
In fact, I may be wrong about this
