Politically incorrect is a politically correct way of saying things that...shouldn't be there.

[Rustic]

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

You don't have a fucking clue what a military weapon is. Dip shit LOL

 

[Dale Smith]

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

You don't have a fucking clue what a military weapon is. Dip shit LOL

\

Leftards and liberals believe only "da gubermint" should have guns because an armed citizenry is a potential obstruction to their communist utopia that they so crave.

 

[SYTFE]

Political correctness extends much further than just politics. It's something that's been happening with language in general for decades. If anyone wants to kill about an hour of their time, I highly recommend this video of Carlin ranting about it. It's one of my favorite videos on the interwebs. Enjoy!

Skip to about 5:30 to hear him speak.

 

[Auld Phart]

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

Rifles, hand guns.

yes

contemporary?

Such as?

 

[Indeependent]

Political correctness extends much further than just politics. It's something that's been happening with language in general for decades. If anyone wants to kill about an hour of their time, I highly recommend this video of Carlin ranting about it. It's one of my favorite videos on the interwebs. Enjoy!

Skip to about 5:30 to hear him speak.

I'm sure George didn't have a bodyguard.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Thanks, maybe you need a dictionary (btw, that's a big book with lots of words)

Mark Twain was a complicated but very talented man. Read, On the Damned Human Race. Judging others who lived at different times is also complicated - as a species we evolve, at least some of us.

Fuck cultural marxism. and fuck the fabian socialists that lamely attempt to set the narrative and declare what is acceptable and what isn't. I say what I mean and I mean what I say...don't like it? Tough shit...it's not like I care.

Does your use of the word fuck give you the sense that you are sane and in touch with reality? You're not.

It's my way of disrespecting this corporate entity that laughingly attempts to pass itself off as a legitimate governmental body. It's my way of thumbing my nose at the fabian socialists and neocons that have hijacked the political system. I do not bend to their will nor will I ever.....get it now? Because I can educate you further if need be. I am here to help.....

Do you cross dress as PoliticalChic? You're really as narcissistic as is she, and as out of touch with reality.

I don't subscribe to "group-think" and no leftard/liberal is going to "hip" me as to what I may or may not say...get it, dumb ass?

I get it. I spent a career dealing with personally disordered persons; we called people like you felony stupid (always in private). That you don't get that the posts you have made are the result of a mentally impaired person, is clear and convincing evident of your mental illness.

 

[Dale Smith]

Fuck cultural marxism. and fuck the fabian socialists that lamely attempt to set the narrative and declare what is acceptable and what isn't. I say what I mean and I mean what I say...don't like it? Tough shit...it's not like I care.

Does your use of the word fuck give you the sense that you are sane and in touch with reality? You're not.

It's my way of disrespecting this corporate entity that laughingly attempts to pass itself off as a legitimate governmental body. It's my way of thumbing my nose at the fabian socialists and neocons that have hijacked the political system. I do not bend to their will nor will I ever.....get it now? Because I can educate you further if need be. I am here to help.....

Do you cross dress as PoliticalChic? You're really as narcissistic as is she, and as out of touch with reality.

I don't subscribe to "group-think" and no leftard/liberal is going to "hip" me as to what I may or may not say...get it, dumb ass?

I get it. I spent a career dealing with personally disordered persons; we called people like you felony stupid (always in private). That you don't get that the posts you have made are the result of a mentally impaired person, is clear and convincing evident of your mental illness.

You lack the intellect to even comprehend the knowledge behind what I post. Those that are not just right of Mao-Tse_tung are potential "terrorists" because you are just that fucking brainwashed. Your opinion of me doesn't mean diddly squat in my world. I will crush you on any topic and with utter ease.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

Rifles, hand guns.

yes

contemporary?

Such as?

Such as land mines, large caliper automatic weapons, small caliper automatic weapons, anti personnel grenades, Surface to air missiles.

 

[Dale Smith]

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

Rifles, hand guns.

yes

contemporary?

Such as?

Such as land mines, large caliper automatic weapons, small caliper automatic weapons, anti personnel grenades, Surface to air missiles.

Why not? Your beloved corporate "gubermint" sells and provides them to rogue elements that they finance to fight proxy wars on their behalf.....don't you know that??

 

[Indeependent]

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

Rifles, hand guns.

yes

contemporary?

Such as?

Such as land mines, large caliper automatic weapons, small caliper automatic weapons, anti personnel grenades, Surface to air missiles.

Why not? Your beloved corporate "gubermint" sells and provides them to rogue elements that they finance to fight proxy wars on their behalf.....don't you know that??

Ouch!

 

[Indeependent]

I thought we were discussing the right to Bare Arms.

 

[bripat9643]

Judging others who lived at different times is also complicated - as a species we evolve, at least some of us.

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

 

[Auld Phart]

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

Not the point.

If you want to take firearms back to 1776 models, why not take Freedom of the Press back to what they had at that time

Is it your opinion that every citizen has the right to own contemporary military arms (i.e. weapons)?

Yes or No.

Rifles, hand guns.

yes

contemporary?

Such as?

Such as land mines, large caliper automatic weapons, small caliper automatic weapons, anti personnel grenades, Surface to air missiles.

"Such as land mines, large caliper automatic weapons, small caliper automatic weapons, anti personnel grenades, Surface to air missiles."

The only 'arms' you listed there are small caliper automatic weapons.

The rest are munitions, artillery, etc

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Judging others who lived at different times is also complicated - as a species we evolve, at least some of us.

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

"Congress shall make no law" applies to all the amendments. It is a restrictive document. It does not grant power.

 

[Timmy]

Judging others who lived at different times is also complicated - as a species we evolve, at least some of us.

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

 

[bripat9643]

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

The bogus liberal understanding of "well regulated" has been explained ad nauseum in this forum.

 

[Auld Phart]

Indeed, applying 21st Century viewpoints to earlier centuries is pretty crazy.

I've often wondered why you crazy Progressives apply modern views of slavery to smear the Founding Fathers.

But not really. I don't wonder why at all.

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

Well regulated?

only concerned militias

 

[Timmy]

Of course you don't wonder, being willfully ignorant (and I'm being kind) you lack curiosity.

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

I wonder why 2nd A. supporters apply modern arms as equally protected with the guns available in the 18th Century?

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

The bogus liberal understanding of "well regulated" has been explained ad nauseum in this forum.

So has your bogus "shall not be infringed ". You ain't the only one who can cherry
Pick Lines.

 

[bripat9643]

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

The bogus liberal understanding of "well regulated" has been explained ad nauseum in this forum.

So has your bogus "shall not be infringed ". You ain't the only one who can cherry
Pick Lines.

So how should "shall not be infringed" be defined?

This should be good.

 

[Rustic]

The press has evolved as much or more than firearms. Is Freedom of the Press limited to newspapers and Town Criers?

Freedom of speech and of the press is pretty much absolute, the ownership and possession of arms is open to discussion (see Scalia's comments in Heller).

No it's not. Scalia was wrong on that issue. "Shall not be infringed" is not subject to interpretation.

You forgot "well regulated " .

Let me ask you. Were our founding fathers required to show state issued photo Id to vote ?

The bogus liberal understanding of "well regulated" has been explained ad nauseum in this forum.

So has your bogus "shall not be infringed ". You ain't the only one who can cherry
Pick Lines.

You're talking out of your ass again, quit falling down the fucking well. LOL