🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Politico: Carson lied about admission to West Point.

You know who also blamed the video? The guy who led the attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=1

So you are actually trying to use the 'terrorist' SCAPEGOAT Obama finally managed to 'bring to justice' a year after the attack/murders, the guy Obama claimed he could not find even though he was on tv bragging about the attacks and murders of 4 Americans...the guy we haven't seen or heard about since he was arrested? (Probably already released along with numerous Gitmo terrorists!)

The guy wasn't smart enough, wasn't highly connected enough, to pull off such a huge attack that lasted around 10 - 11 hours. He was a 'toady' and a good scapegoat for Obama. Immediately after the attack Obama and Hillary were calling for the capture and punishment of THE FILM MAKER for daring to exercise his Freedom of Speech, as if that were the reason for the attack or enough to cover up their own incompetence and abandoning Stevens to die!
 
Sorry to hurt your feelings, but the campaign made the statement on Friday long after the original article was published.

Yeah, got that...then they since pushed back, and politico changed the claim/report they posted on Friday, that started this whole frenzy. They are now trying to spin the story and what they reported to maintain a level of credibility.

Meanwhile only Hillary supporters are trying to spin her lies because they are pretty solid. Despite her declaration (doubling down), for example at the last hearing that she STILL believes a protest / video played a part in Benghazi, the FBI and CIA say there was NEVER a protest, used the compound's own video to prove it, and her own State Dept Rep in Tripoli WARNED her NOT to blame the video/a protest because they KNEW they had NOTHING to do with it and the story would not survive the scrutiny. Got to hand it to Hillary, though, despite being busted I the lie, she is riding it all the way down like slim Pickens on top of that nuke in 'Doctor Strangelove'! :p

You know who also blamed the video?

The guy who led the attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=1

Yes, he was also the man that Condi Rice released from Gitmo I wonder why she was never called to testify before the Benghazi Committee?
 
You know who also blamed the video? The guy who led the attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=1

So you are actually trying to use the 'terrorist' SCAPEGOAT Obama finally managed to 'bring to justice' a year after the attack/murders, the guy Obama claimed he could not find even though he was on tv bragging about the attacks and murders of 4 Americans...the guy we haven't seen or heard about since he was arrested? (Probably already released along with numerous Gitmo terrorists!)

The guy wasn't smart enough, wasn't highly connected enough, to pull off such a huge attack that lasted around 10 - 11 hours. He was a 'toady' and a good scapegoat for Obama. Immediately after the attack Obama and Hillary were calling for the capture and punishment of THE FILM MAKER for daring to exercise his Freedom of Speech, as if that were the reason for the attack or enough to cover up their own incompetence and abandoning Stevens to die!
It is amazing how you people make shit up.
 
So, nu-huh, why did Obama claim the ACA would not cost a dime, would pay for itself, would not put people out of work, would not force people to lose insurance, and if people liked their health care and doctor they could keep them....ALL PROVEN LIES?

WHY did Hillary swear under oath several times that she handed over everything to investigators only for the FBI to find more and her own State Department openly declare that she had NOT?

Are Liberals THAT stupid to think the truth will not eventually get out?

And what do you think Americans find more egregious, a 17yo who doesn't tell the complete facts about a potential scholarship or an ex-1st Lady / Failed Senator / Failed Ex-Sect of State whose incompetence got 4 Americans killed lying only weeks ago about the attack in which they died having been a 'protest' that never existed?
-- Let me help you with that answer: By a WIDE margin Hillary owns the title of 'Least Trusted Candidate' in this entire race!

It should be the duty of all citizens to vette their candidates and decide which faults are acceptable and which faults should disqualify them from their vote. Hillary is the trusted front runner and will prevail much to your great chagrin.
Who trusts Hillary? Aside from the ignorant welfare crowd, I mean...
 
It is amazing how you people make shit up.

The deceased family members have all come out and said how Hillary and Obama were vowing to bring to justice the FILM MAKER, not the actual people who murdered the 1st US Ambassador in over 30 years and 3 other Americans.

Truth hurts like a bi@tch, don't it?!
 
So, nu-huh, why did Obama claim the ACA would not cost a dime, would pay for itself, would not put people out of work, would not force people to lose insurance, and if people liked their health care and doctor they could keep them....ALL PROVEN LIES?

WHY did Hillary swear under oath several times that she handed over everything to investigators only for the FBI to find more and her own State Department openly declare that she had NOT?

Are Liberals THAT stupid to think the truth will not eventually get out?

And what do you think Americans find more egregious, a 17yo who doesn't tell the complete facts about a potential scholarship or an ex-1st Lady / Failed Senator / Failed Ex-Sect of State whose incompetence got 4 Americans killed lying only weeks ago about the attack in which they died having been a 'protest' that never existed?
-- Let me help you with that answer: By a WIDE margin Hillary owns the title of 'Least Trusted Candidate' in this entire race!

It should be the duty of all citizens to vette their candidates and decide which faults are acceptable and which faults should disqualify them from their vote. Hillary is the trusted front runner and will prevail much to your great chagrin.
Who trusts Hillary? Aside from the ignorant welfare crowd, I mean...

You'll have your answer on November 9th, 2016 and you'll live with the result.
 
So, nu-huh, why did Obama claim the ACA would not cost a dime, would pay for itself, would not put people out of work, would not force people to lose insurance, and if people liked their health care and doctor they could keep them....ALL PROVEN LIES?

WHY did Hillary swear under oath several times that she handed over everything to investigators only for the FBI to find more and her own State Department openly declare that she had NOT?

Are Liberals THAT stupid to think the truth will not eventually get out?

And what do you think Americans find more egregious, a 17yo who doesn't tell the complete facts about a potential scholarship or an ex-1st Lady / Failed Senator / Failed Ex-Sect of State whose incompetence got 4 Americans killed lying only weeks ago about the attack in which they died having been a 'protest' that never existed?
-- Let me help you with that answer: By a WIDE margin Hillary owns the title of 'Least Trusted Candidate' in this entire race!

It should be the duty of all citizens to vette their candidates and decide which faults are acceptable and which faults should disqualify them from their vote. Hillary is the trusted front runner and will prevail much to your great chagrin.
Liar.
Poll: 60% don't trust Hillary, 62% say she'll 'do anything' to be president
 
So, nu-huh, why did Obama claim the ACA would not cost a dime, would pay for itself, would not put people out of work, would not force people to lose insurance, and if people liked their health care and doctor they could keep them....ALL PROVEN LIES?

WHY did Hillary swear under oath several times that she handed over everything to investigators only for the FBI to find more and her own State Department openly declare that she had NOT?

Are Liberals THAT stupid to think the truth will not eventually get out?

And what do you think Americans find more egregious, a 17yo who doesn't tell the complete facts about a potential scholarship or an ex-1st Lady / Failed Senator / Failed Ex-Sect of State whose incompetence got 4 Americans killed lying only weeks ago about the attack in which they died having been a 'protest' that never existed?
-- Let me help you with that answer: By a WIDE margin Hillary owns the title of 'Least Trusted Candidate' in this entire race!

It should be the duty of all citizens to vette their candidates and decide which faults are acceptable and which faults should disqualify them from their vote. Hillary is the trusted front runner and will prevail much to your great chagrin.
Liar.
 
So, nu-huh, why did Obama claim the ACA would not cost a dime, would pay for itself, would not put people out of work, would not force people to lose insurance, and if people liked their health care and doctor they could keep them....ALL PROVEN LIES?

WHY did Hillary swear under oath several times that she handed over everything to investigators only for the FBI to find more and her own State Department openly declare that she had NOT?

Are Liberals THAT stupid to think the truth will not eventually get out?

And what do you think Americans find more egregious, a 17yo who doesn't tell the complete facts about a potential scholarship or an ex-1st Lady / Failed Senator / Failed Ex-Sect of State whose incompetence got 4 Americans killed lying only weeks ago about the attack in which they died having been a 'protest' that never existed?
-- Let me help you with that answer: By a WIDE margin Hillary owns the title of 'Least Trusted Candidate' in this entire race!

It should be the duty of all citizens to vette their candidates and decide which faults are acceptable and which faults should disqualify them from their vote. Hillary is the trusted front runner and will prevail much to your great chagrin.
Liar.
Poll: 60% don't trust Hillary, 62% say she'll 'do anything' to be president

You'll have your answer one year from today.
 

We still can't get past several things:
1. You use the Washington Post as your source, the same media you proclaimed to me when I had used it as a source as 'Not Credible'?! :p

2. Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama intentionally LIED to the American people by declaring falsely that the Benghazi attack was the result of a protest (that never happened) over a video produced by a man in the U.S.

3. The FBI, CIA, State Department Rep in Tripoli, AND EVEN HILLARY CLINTON HERSELF ("We KNOW this was a terrorist attack and that the video had nothing to do with the attack") all declared the video NEVER played a part, and there was NEVER a protest.

4. Both Hillary and Obama APOLOGIZED for our nation's Freedom of Speech and vowed to being the FILM MAKER to justice!

5. HOW MANY terrorists has Obama released from Gitmo, to include the Taliban 5? Two weeks after the release of the 5, the faction one of the 5 helped lead slaughtered an entire village of over 100 men, women, and children! Obama continued to LIE about how the 5 were part of the exchange - they were NEVER part of the exchange. The group that held Bergdahl demanded to get paid and GOT PAID!
 
It is amazing how you people make shit up.

The deceased family members have all come out and said how Hillary and Obama were vowing to bring to justice the FILM MAKER, not the actual people who murdered the 1st US Ambassador in over 30 years and 3 other Americans.

Truth hurts like a bi@tch, don't it?!
That is not true. The President vowed to bring those responsible for the attack to justice from the very beginning. He has brought more terrorist to justice than any President in history. Even Gadaffi was brought to justice and that terrorist was left free from the days that Ronald Reagan let him get away with blowing up our commercial jet over Lockerbie. One of the Benghazi terrorist is in our custody and if the Obama doctrine holds, the rest will be brought to justice one way or the other.
 
You know who also blamed the video? The guy who led the attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/18/w...egin-to-answer-questions-on-assault.html?_r=1

So you are actually trying to use the 'terrorist' SCAPEGOAT Obama finally managed to 'bring to justice' a year after the attack/murders, the guy Obama claimed he could not find even though he was on tv bragging about the attacks and murders of 4 Americans...the guy we haven't seen or heard about since he was arrested? (Probably already released along with numerous Gitmo terrorists!)

The guy wasn't smart enough, wasn't highly connected enough, to pull off such a huge attack that lasted around 10 - 11 hours. He was a 'toady' and a good scapegoat for Obama. Immediately after the attack Obama and Hillary were calling for the capture and punishment of THE FILM MAKER for daring to exercise his Freedom of Speech, as if that were the reason for the attack or enough to cover up their own incompetence and abandoning Stevens to die!

Oh, he's a scapegoat now, is he?

Poor little feller.

Maybe you should visit the guy and bring him some snacks. Show him your support.

And the "filmmaker"? He broke the law.

Another one of your heroes?
 

We still can't get past several things:
1. You use the Washington Post as your source, the same media you proclaimed to me when I had used it as a source as 'Not Credible'?! :p

2. Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama intentionally LIED to the American people by declaring falsely that the Benghazi attack was the result of a protest (that never happened) over a video produced by a man in the U.S.

3. The FBI, CIA, State Department Rep in Tripoli, AND EVEN HILLARY CLINTON HERSELF ("We KNOW this was a terrorist attack and that the video had nothing to do with the attack") all declared the video NEVER played a part, and there was NEVER a protest.

4. Both Hillary and Obama APOLOGIZED for our nation's Freedom of Speech and vowed to being the FILM MAKER to justice!

5. HOW MANY terrorists has Obama released from Gitmo, to include the Taliban 5? Two weeks after the release of the 5, the faction one of the 5 helped lead slaughtered an entire village of over 100 men, women, and children! Obama continued to LIE about how the 5 were part of the exchange - they were NEVER part of the exchange. The group that held Bergdahl demanded to get paid and GOT PAID!
What we need is an investigative congressional committee to look into these allegations and imaginations your have brought to our attention.
 
A. 17yo doesn't get facts accurately about being offered a scholarship....

B. Secretary of State that wants to be President completely FAILED as Secretary of State to the point of allowing 4 Americans to die, told the Turkish PM 'we KNOW it was a terrorist attack / the video had nothing to do with it before lying to the American people, thee person who will be responsible for protecting and defending the Constitution vowed to the grieving families of those she abandoned to die that she would 'bring to justice' the man who exercised his Constitutional Right of Freedom of Speech - who she falsely blamed for the 4 deaths, and being in the middle of an FBI investigation for criminal his-handling of classified information that damaged our national security...

Gee, who is the least trustworthy? Amazingly enough rabid Liberals believe option B is a better presidential choice and that Option A is a bigger threat to our national security and to American lives.

:wtf:
 

We still can't get past several things:
1. You use the Washington Post as your source, the same media you proclaimed to me when I had used it as a source as 'Not Credible'?! :p

2. Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama intentionally LIED to the American people by declaring falsely that the Benghazi attack was the result of a protest (that never happened) over a video produced by a man in the U.S.

3. The FBI, CIA, State Department Rep in Tripoli, AND EVEN HILLARY CLINTON HERSELF ("We KNOW this was a terrorist attack and that the video had nothing to do with the attack") all declared the video NEVER played a part, and there was NEVER a protest.

4. Both Hillary and Obama APOLOGIZED for our nation's Freedom of Speech and vowed to being the FILM MAKER to justice!

5. HOW MANY terrorists has Obama released from Gitmo, to include the Taliban 5? Two weeks after the release of the 5, the faction one of the 5 helped lead slaughtered an entire village of over 100 men, women, and children! Obama continued to LIE about how the 5 were part of the exchange - they were NEVER part of the exchange. The group that held Bergdahl demanded to get paid and GOT PAID!

1. You will have to point out where I did that because I think you are confused.

2. The House Select Committee on Intelligence cleared Hillary and the State Department of any wrongdoing in regards to the attack.

3. See #2

4. When you are a diplomat you do diplomatic things like apologize.

5. So? George Bush released more than 500 terrorists from Guantanamo so they could go back to terrarating.
 
Oh, he's a scapegoat now, is he? Poor little feller. Maybe you should visit the guy and bring him some snacks. Show him your support. And the "filmmaker"? He broke the law. Another one of your heroes?

Sallow, 9/11/12 was a long time ago. Where is the 'mastermind of Benghazi'? Why hasn't he been brought to trial? He is the guy Obama NOW says is responsible for the murder of the 1st Ambassador in over 30 years (on his watch) and 3 other Americans. Why has he disappeared off the face of the earth?

Obama and Hillary did not go after the film maker, or so they professed, because he broke any law. They vowed to bring the 'film maker' to justice, not the guy who committed 'x' crime. They blamed this guy for exercising his Freedom of Speech which they insisted resulted in a protest that NEVER happened and the very real murders of 4 Americans! They all but apologized for our Freedom of Speech, told the grieving families HE was responsible for the deaths of their loved ones, and vowed to bring him to 'justice'.

And here you type the justification for these PROVEN LIES spewed by the incompetent, lying, self-protecting FAILURES who abandoned 4 Americans to die needlessly at the hands of terrorists! Pathetic!
 
Department of Social Sciences - Scholarship Opportunities

"Fulbright Scholarship:
The Fulbright is a State Department funded initiative that facilitates overseas research, education, and cultural exchanges. As cadets, you are eligible to apply for the Academic U.S. Student Grant, which funds a one-year Master's degree at a foreign institution. It is an incredible opportunity for a young officer and will pay dividends both in the short and long-term. "
 

Forum List

Back
Top