POLL: Are USMB Trump supporters okay with this plan?

[22lcidw]

You have a point there. We don't teach kids about talking snakes and our kids have a good understanding on how evolution works. So there's that.

Of course, part of the problem is that because Texas is the largest market for textbooks, the textbook publishers tend to dumb down the textbooks to play in Texas, which is why we NEED federal standards.

But, man, you can't argue with results, can you? Check out these maps!

With all of this, why are the ghettos still ghettos? You are saying that these areas are Mensa and the people living there are Rhodes Scholars. They are not.

 

[Mac1958]

They'll defend it and deflect for it in the thread, but they don't have the balls to vote for it in the poll.

That tells you all you need to know.

 

[j-mac]

With all of this, why are the ghettos still ghettos? You are saying that these areas are Mensa and the people living there are Rhodes Scholars. They are not.

Ofcourse Joe loves the public Ed system, having all the children in centralized indoctrination centers allows easy access

 

[j-mac]

They'll defend it and deflect for it in the thread, but they don't have the balls to vote for it in the poll.

That tells you all you need to know.

You’re polls suck…do better.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Sorry, Mac, you long ago lost credibility with both sides.

Since the Dept of Ed is a Federal Agency, I'm not sure what impact that would have on local schools offering gender confirming care.

Or why the GOP thinks this is a winning issue, exactly. The only people upset about this are the ones who were going to vote Republican anyway.

you long ago lost credibility with both sides.
thats it right there......

 

[DBA]

You have a point there. We don't teach kids about talking snakes and our kids have a good understanding on how evolution works. So there's that.

We also shouldn't teach a boy that he can be a girl and vice-versa. There is that too.

Of course, part of the problem is that because Texas is the largest market for textbooks, the textbook publishers tend to dumb down the textbooks to play in Texas, which is why we NEED federal standards

What you want is to teach more of the fake science to everyone to get them onboard. Indoctrination is the goal. You are already lost, but it would be nice to put a damper on it before we lose the entire country.

But, man, you can't argue with results, can you? Check out these maps!

What results? There are more highly indoctrinated folks in blue states. We all know that. We also know that a college educated barista is no more valuable to our society than a plumber with a high school diploma, in fact, with the extreme doctrination that is going on in our colleges, the barista could be far less valuable despite spending an untold fortune on a useless degree. Ironically, it is the barista that wants the plumber to pick up part of the bill for his/her college education/indoctrination.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

An old idea that is a much better proposal, end the Education Department.

.

Allow individual districts or even neighborhoods choose their educators.

Abolish teachers' unions. My late husband was a teacher in the late 70's and despised the unions.

.

 

[DBA]

They'll defend it and deflect for it in the thread, but they don't have the balls to vote for it in the poll.

That tells you all you need to know.

Nobody is running. It is a good idea to for a President to put people with similar ideas into positions of power. Biden has done exactly that, but you didn't seem to mind.

 

[struth]

The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

• Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
• What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
• Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
• What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
• Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
• Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
• Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).

I am all for rooting out people that want to hurt children....

I suppose my question is, why aren't you? That used to be something that was rather bipartisan....not harming kids

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Lol, the Deportment of Education is doing a bang up job, they should be outright abolished.

Just like Reagan.
Teabaggers want a free-for-all on educating America's school children.......and it shows.
Indoctrinated, dumbasses is what Reagan wanted too.

1982​

In his State of the Union speech, President Ronald Reagan calls for the end of the Department of Education. Reagan says he believes that decisions about education should be made at the local level and that the federal government should play only a minor role in the nation’s schools. The speech stirs a debate in Congress. In the end, the department is funded, although at lower levels than in the past.

 

[Couchpotato]

Sorry, Mac, you long ago lost credibility with both sides.

Since the Dept of Ed is a Federal Agency, I'm not sure what impact that would have on local schools offering gender confirming care.

Or why the GOP thinks this is a winning issue, exactly. The only people upset about this are the ones who were going to vote Republican anyway.

I think there are quite a few parents who arent super happy about the school doing something like this without their knowledge. That has little to do with the "trans" issue. The school shouldn't be doing anything remotely similar to this without the parent's knowledge and consent.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Where is the Dept of Ed in the Constitution?

I'll wait

It isn't.
But neither are

• Department of Agriculture (USDA)
• Department of Commerce (DOC)
• Department of Defense (DOD)
• Department of Education.
• Department of Energy (DOE)
• Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
• Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
• Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. Fifteen executive departments — each led by an appointed member of the President’s Cabinet — carry out the day-to-day administration of the federal government.

SO.......by all means let's get rid of education, period.
It's working so well.............even with it, people are STUPID.

 

[okfine]

Fuck, let's go one better. Let's get rid of public education, and then return the tax dollars to the people. And the people who have kids can pay to have their kids educated or home school them.

For sure, or just move to a Red State and put all the kids to work.

 

[Crick]

The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

• Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
• What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
• Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
• What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
• Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
• Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
• Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).

"The president does not, in fact, have the “unfettered power to fire anyone.” And until and unless the Supreme Court reverses a 30-year-old ruling, he doesn’t even have the power to fire Mueller without good cause. It turns out that running the executive branch really is different from running a business."

Opinion | Steve Vladeck: Trump says he can fire anyone. Here's why he's wrong.

Trump can't actually fire whoever he wants. But the fact that he thinks he can makes a bill protecting the special counsel feel increasingly necessary.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

• Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
• What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
• Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
• What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
• Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
• Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
• Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).

.


It's pretty stupid that so many people have so much difficulty understanding the simple concept of STOP HURTING CHILDREN.

If there is anything remotely resembling sexuality in what you want to do with children, STOP IT!

Nothing more needs to be said.

If you don't stop it, you will not like what will happen.



.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Sorry, Mac, you long ago lost credibility with both sides.

Since the Dept of Ed is a Federal Agency, I'm not sure what impact that would have on local schools offering gender confirming care.

Or why the GOP thinks this is a winning issue, exactly. The only people upset about this are the ones who were going to vote Republican anyway.

"gender confirming care" Lol. You're either xx or xy. What a bunch of depraved reprobate loons.

 

[martybegan]

The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

• Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
• What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
• Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
• What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
• Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
• Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
• Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).

He has to start with the FBI and DoJ, the DoE is further down on the list.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

D. Mac's polls suck. Who's the leader of the forward party? Long duck dong?

 

[Billiejeens]

Fuck, let's go one better. Let's get rid of public education, and then return the tax dollars to the people. And the people who have kids can pay to have their kids educated or home school them.

Nice sarcasm -

Direct Payment or Home school would mean accountability.
Accountability always improves things.
You know that a well-educated populace would mean a quick end to your party.

 

[The Duke]

The former President and current presidential candidate promises to do the following, and I'd like to know how his supporters feel about it:

"On Day One, we will begin to find and remove the radical zealots and Marxists who have infiltrated the federal Department of Education. And that also includes others, and you know who you are. Because we're not going to allow anybody to hurt our children. Joe Biden has given them unchecked power. I will have them fired and escorted from the building."

If you agree with this, I'd ask:

• Who is to decide who the "radical zealots and Marxists" are?
• What should the criteria for this be, exactly?
• Is it okay with you that they are fired with no due process?
• What do you think of "that also includes others, and you know who you are"? Does that sound a little vague to you?
• Does the thought of federal agents escorting Americans who have broken no laws out of a building sit okay with you?
• Do you feel this is a Constitutional idea?
• Is a government this aggressive, arbitrary and punitive a good example to set for American children?

Perhaps you can provide some clear, direct and honest responses after you're through trying to deflect with the predictable personal insults and name-calling (that's okay, I'm used to it, and it's always a good sign).

I'll do one better.

Abolish the entire Dept of Ed at the federal level.

Return education to the states and the localities as it should be.

Done. The end.

Education has gone down every year since it was started. Obviously a useless bureau.