Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder who's goons murdered Epstein in his jail cell?His Department HAS part of that evidence. It is not his place to say he won't provide the information to Congress. They are co-equal branches and he does not have more power than Congress.He's smart. He will wait till all the evidence one way or another is in.
Only a lefty loon like you would call that stone walling.
He is stonewalling and it makes him look guilty as sin. "I haven't read the transcript so I can't comment." He was IN on the call. Lying sack of shit is what he is. One of Trump's goons.
Evidence of any of this?I wonder who's goons murdered Epstein in his jail cell?His Department HAS part of that evidence. It is not his place to say he won't provide the information to Congress. They are co-equal branches and he does not have more power than Congress.He's smart. He will wait till all the evidence one way or another is in.
Only a lefty loon like you would call that stone walling.
He is stonewalling and it makes him look guilty as sin. "I haven't read the transcript so I can't comment." He was IN on the call. Lying sack of shit is what he is. One of Trump's goons.
Which goons kicked down Manafort's door and stole and destroyed evidence of Democrat's corruption in Ukraine?
Who's goons are claiming to be whistleblowers and are being protected by Democrats?
Who's goons are in Portland screaming at the top of their lungs at 76 year old grandmas with their walkers when they try to cross the street?
I would like some word from the rubes in the executive branch as to when they will start complying with the laws of the United States. If you are commanded to produce documents, you produce them.
Yeah.....they are actual events that are in the news.Evidence of any of this?I wonder who's goons murdered Epstein in his jail cell?His Department HAS part of that evidence. It is not his place to say he won't provide the information to Congress. They are co-equal branches and he does not have more power than Congress.He's smart. He will wait till all the evidence one way or another is in.
Only a lefty loon like you would call that stone walling.
He is stonewalling and it makes him look guilty as sin. "I haven't read the transcript so I can't comment." He was IN on the call. Lying sack of shit is what he is. One of Trump's goons.
Which goons kicked down Manafort's door and stole and destroyed evidence of Democrat's corruption in Ukraine?
Who's goons are claiming to be whistleblowers and are being protected by Democrats?
Who's goons are in Portland screaming at the top of their lungs at 76 year old grandmas with their walkers when they try to cross the street?
Says who?A formal inquiry begins with a vote, in fact the vote is what makes it formal vs informal.Look kid I know Nancy said she opened a formal inquiry but she lied as a formal inquiry begins with a vote.You mean you never saw the video where Biden gave the Ukraine 6 hours to comply or swim with the fishes....lol... didn't happen. but good luck getting more traction outside your bubble.
Lol have Nancy open the investigation officially like she lied and said she did
Just do it
PS Hunter Biden is hiding in Dubai a non extradition country
Enjoy
You mean you never saw the video where Biden gave the Ukraine 6 hours to comply or swim with the fishes....
^ fake news.
Bidens in Ukraine: An Explainer
Lol have Nancy open the investigation officially like she lied and said she did
^ fake news
pelosi formal inquiry - Google Search
PS Hunter Biden is hiding in Dubai a non extradition country
Play on
ummmm.... no. you are either mistaken due to the fake news you swallow - or you are deliberately lying. a formal inquiry needs no 'vote' - it is only to show that the speaker is on board with INVESTIGATING. votes are required within the judiciary committee to go ahead with impeachment proceedings & articles of impeachment are drawn up - then it goes to the floor.
And then some of them will resign and testify anyway. Like Volker.So..the stonewalling begins..will it work? Or..will it just pour gas on an already burning fire?
I sense Pompeo may be panicking just a bit..after all...what harm could there be..if all was on the up and up?
Pompeo says State Dept. officials won’t show up for scheduled impeachment depositions this week
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo fired a broadside at House Democrats on Tuesday, saying State Department officials scheduled to appear this week before committees conducting the impeachment inquiry would not be made available until “we obtain further clarity on these matters.”
The refusal, in a letter to House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), described the demand for depositions by five officials who played a role in U.S. relations with Ukraine as “an attempt to intimidate, bully, and treat improperly, the distinguished professionals of the Department of State.”
The statements came as Pompeo’s role in the Ukraine investigation broadened with reports that he was a participant in the July 25 call by President Trump to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, which led to the impeachment investigation.
Before that report, first published by The Wall Street Journal, Pompeo had brushed off questions about the incident, saying last week that he had not yet read the transcript of the telephone call released by the White House, or the whistleblower complaint that it sparked.
The committee, along with the House Intelligence and Oversight panels, had requested the five officials to appear for depositions this week and next, to begin Wednesday with Marie Yovanovitch, who was recalled by Pompeo as ambassador to Ukraine in May, prior to the end of her tour.
Other State Department officials scheduled for depositions include Kurt Volker, the administration’s special envoy to Ukraine, wo resigned last week; Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent; U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland; and State Department Counselor T. Ulrich Brechbuhl."
But Dobbs is a robot....
Says congressional rules. Nancy said she was doing this but never will because the gop gets to call witnesses too and hunter Biden is number 1Says who?A formal inquiry begins with a vote, in fact the vote is what makes it formal vs informal.Look kid I know Nancy said she opened a formal inquiry but she lied as a formal inquiry begins with a vote.You mean you never saw the video where Biden gave the Ukraine 6 hours to comply or swim with the fishes....
Lol have Nancy open the investigation officially like she lied and said she did
Just do it
PS Hunter Biden is hiding in Dubai a non extradition country
Enjoy
You mean you never saw the video where Biden gave the Ukraine 6 hours to comply or swim with the fishes....
^ fake news.
Bidens in Ukraine: An Explainer
Lol have Nancy open the investigation officially like she lied and said she did
^ fake news
pelosi formal inquiry - Google Search
PS Hunter Biden is hiding in Dubai a non extradition country
Play on
ummmm.... no. you are either mistaken due to the fake news you swallow - or you are deliberately lying. a formal inquiry needs no 'vote' - it is only to show that the speaker is on board with INVESTIGATING. votes are required within the judiciary committee to go ahead with impeachment proceedings & articles of impeachment are drawn up - then it goes to the floor.
He would have to start before he could stop.How about they start doing their jobs and stop wasting all this time and money?The question is "what can congress do about it?".
How be Trump stops violating the law and the Consitution, and stops inviting foreign governments to involve themselves in US elections.
Investigating crimes with video taped evidence isn't involving themselves in an election.
can't wait 'till the state dept IG goes to the hill today to show what he's got.
What he has is an identified politically-partisan, Democrat 2020 Presidential Candidate-supporting, CIA agent - who used to work for fired proven failed coup conspirator, the CIA and Director that admitted to illegally spying on reporters, the media, US Senators, and even USSC Justices - who was specifically trained in Ukrainian geo-political Ops and was assigned to the WH temporarily filing a Whistle Blower complaint based on 2nd-hand account information and other politically-partisan sources and pushed for it to quickly be sent to Congress, which was NOT how the process worked, according to the Whistle Blower rule / law.
He also has the exposed fact now that he altered that rule for this specific complaint to ensure it went to Congress instead of being kept at the lower level and investigated, as the rule called for in 2nd-hand account complaints.
He should have to answer why he altered the rule / protocol to push an unsubstantiated 2nd-hand account accusation to Congress where he KNEW the Democrats would quickly politicize and weaponize it, claiming it was an 'Impeachable Offense'.
He should also have to answer the question of was he aware of the existing Mutual Law Enforcement and Investigative Assistance treaties between the US and European nations which made what the President did an execution of existing US treaties, not a violation of the law. If he did not know, WHY not? And how can someone be unaware of this yet sit in a position as Inspector General of the Intel agency...
.Anyone who does not immediately see something very wrong with the ICIG's rush to change the rule just to facilitate the Democrats' latest 'Impeachment Collusion Delusion' is being willfully ignorant or false....imho.
Trump hasn't called on the Ukraine to investigate corruption under foreign legal treaties. He asked the President of the Ukraine to help his re-election campaign by finding dirt on his Democratic opponents.
Yeah....a good reason to have an up and down vote soon.And then some of them will resign and testify anyway. Like Volker.So..the stonewalling begins..will it work? Or..will it just pour gas on an already burning fire?
I sense Pompeo may be panicking just a bit..after all...what harm could there be..if all was on the up and up?
Pompeo says State Dept. officials won’t show up for scheduled impeachment depositions this week
"Secretary of State Mike Pompeo fired a broadside at House Democrats on Tuesday, saying State Department officials scheduled to appear this week before committees conducting the impeachment inquiry would not be made available until “we obtain further clarity on these matters.”
The refusal, in a letter to House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), described the demand for depositions by five officials who played a role in U.S. relations with Ukraine as “an attempt to intimidate, bully, and treat improperly, the distinguished professionals of the Department of State.”
The statements came as Pompeo’s role in the Ukraine investigation broadened with reports that he was a participant in the July 25 call by President Trump to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, which led to the impeachment investigation.
Before that report, first published by The Wall Street Journal, Pompeo had brushed off questions about the incident, saying last week that he had not yet read the transcript of the telephone call released by the White House, or the whistleblower complaint that it sparked.
The committee, along with the House Intelligence and Oversight panels, had requested the five officials to appear for depositions this week and next, to begin Wednesday with Marie Yovanovitch, who was recalled by Pompeo as ambassador to Ukraine in May, prior to the end of her tour.
Other State Department officials scheduled for depositions include Kurt Volker, the administration’s special envoy to Ukraine, wo resigned last week; Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent; U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland; and State Department Counselor T. Ulrich Brechbuhl."
Exactly. They cannot ignore subpoenas from Congress, during an impeachment investigation, under orders from anyone, including the President. These clowns are now in official your ass is going to prison territory. Once the official impeachment hearings begin, the President loses the power of the pardon, and none of them are safe. All refusals now are separate charges in the articles of impeachment. I suggest they all read the history of what happened to the clowns that thought they could do the samething during the Nixon impeachment hearings.
Trump hasn't called on the Ukraine to investigate corruption under foreign legal treaties. He asked the President of the Ukraine to help his re-election campaign by finding dirt on his Democratic opponents.
Thank you for your personally politically-biased, Trump-hating, emotional projection / opinion; however, in this case I am forced to agree with EVERY RELEVANT CRIMINAL DIVISION IN THE DOJ WHO INVESTIGATED THIS AND UNANIMOUSLY CONCLUDED NOT ONLY WAS THERE NO CRIME COMMITTED, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THERE WAS A CRIME COMMITTED.
Welcome to the Butt-hurt Democrat 'Collusion Delusion 2.0 - Ukraine', where you don't have to have legitimate evidence of a crime to attempt to Impeach the President - you just have to have heard your Trump-hating buddies SAY THEY believe the President committed a crime.
"Lost amid the cacophony of condemnation of Trump is the fact that the Criminal Division of the Justice Department examined the official record of the Trump-Zelensky telephone call and concluded there was no crime, not even a violation of campaign finance laws. “All relevant components of the Department agreed with this legal conclusion,” said the Justice Department."
Gregg Jarrett: Trump did NOT commit an impeachable offense on call with Ukraine’s president – Here’s why
Snowflake, you just claimed to know exactly what the President of the United States was thinking and what he said during his phone conversation with the Ukraine PM....I love how you talk about my "emotional projection" while posting in all caps, with not a single shred of truth to it.
Snowflake, you just claimed to know exactly what the President of the United States was thinking and what he said during his phone conversation with the Ukraine PM....I love how you talk about my "emotional projection" while posting in all caps, with not a single shred of truth to it.
...and you completely rejected a report / documented fact w/link by responding with a debunked emotional comment...
(BTW, the transcripts of the conversation showed you don't know what the hell you're talking about....)
The transcripts of the conversation showed that President Zelensky asked for Javellin missiles, and the next thing out of Trump's mouth was "I need a favour though". Trump then goes on to outline that he needs evidence of two debunked conspiracy theories, and asked the Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, and to get the DNC server from Crowdstrike. Trump could not have spoken more plainly about what he wanted.
Trump asked for a political favour in exchange for military aid to fight the Russians - aid that Trump was already withholding and aid, paid for by the American people, which was only released to the Ukranians on the day the whistleblowers complaint was made public.
Even if Trump's allegations against Biden weren't a total lie and misrepresentation of the facts of the case, asking for this investigation is a total betrayal of the Constitution of the United States and everything for which it stands. It is naked abuse of power. Now Trump is threatening the whistleblower and calling his Constitutionally based impeachment a coup. This is obstruction.
The Democrats are involved in a massive cover-up of the wrongdoing of the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton.Dems trying to deny State Dept employees from having legal counsel is not only disturbing but ILLEGAL. Dems obviously have issues respecting Constitutional rights & the rule of law.
Great, I've been waiting for someone to find that rule. G'head and show me where that rule is...Says congressional rules. Nancy said she was doing this but never will because the gop gets to call witnesses too and hunter Biden is number 1Says who?A formal inquiry begins with a vote, in fact the vote is what makes it formal vs informal.Look kid I know Nancy said she opened a formal inquiry but she lied as a formal inquiry begins with a vote.You mean you never saw the video where Biden gave the Ukraine 6 hours to comply or swim with the fishes....
^ fake news.
Bidens in Ukraine: An Explainer
Lol have Nancy open the investigation officially like she lied and said she did
^ fake news
pelosi formal inquiry - Google Search
PS Hunter Biden is hiding in Dubai a non extradition country
Play on
ummmm.... no. you are either mistaken due to the fake news you swallow - or you are deliberately lying. a formal inquiry needs no 'vote' - it is only to show that the speaker is on board with INVESTIGATING. votes are required within the judiciary committee to go ahead with impeachment proceedings & articles of impeachment are drawn up - then it goes to the floor.
