Portuguese court finds PCR test 97% inaccurate for diagnosing COVID

[Burgermeister]

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives​

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

 

[rampart]

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives​

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

are we still using the pcr? shouldn't our dynamic job creators have a better test by now?

 

[theHawk]

Dun dun dun….

It was all a scam, just like we said.

 

[Burgermeister]

are we still using the pcr? shouldn't our dynamic job creators have a better test by now?

They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2

 

[rampart]

They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2

of course we want a better test. who doesn't?

"we need less testing. the more we test the worse my numbers look." trump

 

[0311]

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives​

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

Fucking Russian Propaganda right from Russia Today. A propaganda arm of Pooty's dictatorship.

 

[Burgermeister]

Guess what technology they use to detect it in animals and force the destruction of our meat supply? Yep, PCR.

 

[0311]

Guess what technology they use to detect it in animals and force the destruction of our meat supply? Yep, PCR.

Russian Propaganda. A Russian Bot posts Russian Propaganda. Fake news of the worst kind.

 

[Burgermeister]

Russian Propaganda. A Russian Bot posts Russian Propaganda. Fake news of the worst kind.

You don't have any idea how stupid you sound, do you?

 

[0311]

You don't have any idea how stupid you sound, do you?

The story was lifted from RT (Russia Today). RT is a Russian Propaganda site pushing Pooty's words to those ignorant few who do know and/or do not that they getting Russian State Approved Propaganda.

 

[MisterBeale]

Summary of ruling by Portuguese court with links to original - before the usual geniuses dismiss this because of the source. This whole thing was a scam.​

​

Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives​

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

...

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

"Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his role in the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[2] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. PCR became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR."[3]. . ."

Kary Mullis - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

PCR Test Founder Kary Mullis Speaks Out Against the Misinterpretation of the PCR Test​

Dr. Kary Mullis on Anthony Fauci​

 

[MisterBeale]

They don't want a better test. They need to be able to manipulate it to create a panic and subsequent funding and regulatory relief over false numbers. Even the PCR inventor knows the deal - The purported increase in “cases” is a direct consequence of increased testing through the inappropriate use of the PCR instrument to diagnose so-called COVID-19. It has been well established that the PCR test was never designed or intended as a diagnostic tool and is not an acceptable instrument to measure this so-called pandemic. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has clearly indicated that the PCR testing device was never created to test for coronavirus Mullis warns that, “the PCR Test can be used to find almost anything, in anybody. If you can amplify one single molecule, then you can find it because that molecule is nearly in every single person”2

Sometimes I wonder. .. if the establishment purposely just waited until Kary Mullis was dead and buried before they pulled this scam.

 

[MisterBeale]

The story was lifted from RT (Russia Today). RT is a Russian Propaganda site pushing Pooty's words to those ignorant few who do know and/or do not that they getting Russian State Approved Propaganda.

The article links right to the documents, you can use a translator, if you like. You are just using fallacious attacks, because you know it is a factual report. The evidence is in the article.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The article links right to the documents, you can use a translator, if you like. You are just using fallacious attacks, because you know it is a factual report. The evidence is in the article.

Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.

 

[0311]

Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.

Russian Propaganda is Russian Propaganda.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Russian Propaganda is Russian Propaganda.

It's russian propaganda if it's coming from the state. You still don't get it though. The source isn't from russia. Weird how you believe US propaganda and lies and there was a ton coming out our own govt on covid.

 

[MisterBeale]

Yeah, but these are the same people that will scream that you're an anti-vaxxer because you refuse to take an mRNA injection but have had almost all conventional vaccines. They're oblivious or afraid to acknowledge the real truth of these injections.

Agreed, the establishment equivocates, but they cannot hide or change the facts.

Merriam-Webster didn’t remove the immunity portion to its vaccine definition. It changed the wording. - Poynter

The updated definition says that vaccines stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease.

www.poynter.org

 

[PeterPilot]

are we still using the pcr? shouldn't our dynamic job creators have a better test by now?

The PCR test is great, won a Nobel Prize in chemistry I think, but as its inventor said, and as the package insert says, NOT TO BE USED FOR DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES.

Misusing those tests was the cornerstone of the Scamdemic.

 

[0311]

It's russian propaganda if it's coming from the state. You still don't get it though. The source isn't from russia. Weird how you believe US propaganda and lies and there was a ton coming out our own govt on covid.

You lying through your eye teeth. Russia Today is a Russian State Propaganda Organ the dictatorship of the Communist Vladmir Putin. I do not read Russian Propaganda, you people swim in it.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You lying through your eye teeth. Russia Today is a Russian State Propaganda Organ the dictatorship of the Communist Vladmir Putin. I do not read Russian Propaganda, you people swim in it.

Its a ruling from portugal. Lol. You really don't know do you. Lol.