PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Feb 24, 2014
- 44,141
- 2,773
That is simply untrue. Use your words, correctly.Umm yes, he was. A FAG pedophile, the worst kind.He wasn't a pedophile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is simply untrue. Use your words, correctly.Umm yes, he was. A FAG pedophile, the worst kind.He wasn't a pedophile.
WTF is with you lefties trying to redefine all the deviant & ILLEGAL behavior in our nation?He wasn't a pedophile.
The hell he wasn't
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Supposedly Milk was attracted to boys/men in their late teens and early twenties. Still not cool - it's under age and he was a good bit older - but not pedophilia.
Close enough for USMB.Harvey Milk
Remind me why we should honor a pedophile who's main contribution to human history was getting gunned down?
![]()
He wasn't a pedophile unless you use the Zeitgeist definition meaning someone into having sex with teenagers. But in actuality that'd be hebephile, not pedophile (which traditionally means someone under age 12.)
If we allow the Zeitgeist version then rockers like Ted Nugent are "pedophiles" too. And public figures like Phil Robertson advocate pedophilia when he says men should marry 16 year-olds.
Now tell me why Milk deserves a stamp.
Rock Hudson was in the closet, and wasn't killed by a nut with a gun.So are lots of people. Like Rock Hudson. Why not honor someone who actually did something? I mean other than boink underage boys.If you're expecting an honest answer forget it. They can't even answer the original question: What did he do other than boink underage boys to get his face on a stamp?This is one of those "repeat a lie enough and people will start believing it" threads, isn't it?PO should not be elevating a twisted sick pedophile such as milk.
What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys.....hint: not jerry sandusky
He was gay.
He wasn't either, and you can take your issue up with the Post Office. My bet is they've published a Christopher Columbus stamp and he committed genocide.He was the first openly gay elected official of any importance in this country. Hardly matters now but it was a big deal then. You had to be there as they say.If you're expecting an honest answer forget it. They can't even answer the original question: What did he do other than boink underage boys to get his face on a stamp?This is one of those "repeat a lie enough and people will start believing it" threads, isn't it?
What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys.....hint: not jerry sandusky
Theres nothing special about electing some sexual deviant who preys upon underage boys. Only freaks would honor him.
Since that is the topic of this thread, WTF are you doing responding to it? Stupid?Close enough for USMB.Harvey Milk
Remind me why we should honor a pedophile who's main contribution to human history was getting gunned down?
![]()
He wasn't a pedophile unless you use the Zeitgeist definition meaning someone into having sex with teenagers. But in actuality that'd be hebephile, not pedophile (which traditionally means someone under age 12.)
If we allow the Zeitgeist version then rockers like Ted Nugent are "pedophiles" too. And public figures like Phil Robertson advocate pedophilia when he says men should marry 16 year-olds.
Now tell me why Milk deserves a stamp.
That's another question and not one I'm qualified to answer not having used a stamp since...Hmm...![]()
WTF is with you right-wingers being unable to use words correctly?WTF is with you lefties trying to redefine all the deviant & ILLEGAL behavior in our nation?He wasn't a pedophile.
The hell he wasn't
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Supposedly Milk was attracted to boys/men in their late teens and early twenties. Still not cool - it's under age and he was a good bit older - but not pedophilia.
Then you have no dog in this fight now do you?Im not taking issue with the PO. I don't use them.He wasn't either, and you can take your issue up with the Post Office. My bet is they've published a Christopher Columbus stamp and he committed genocide.He was the first openly gay elected official of any importance in this country. Hardly matters now but it was a big deal then. You had to be there as they say.If you're expecting an honest answer forget it. They can't even answer the original question: What did he do other than boink underage boys to get his face on a stamp?What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys.....hint: not jerry sandusky
Theres nothing special about electing some sexual deviant who preys upon underage boys. Only freaks would honor him.
That is simply untrue. Use your words, correctly.Umm yes, he was. A FAG pedophile, the worst kind.He wasn't a pedophile.
So are lots of people. Like Rock Hudson. Why not honor someone who actually did something? I mean other than boink underage boys.If you're expecting an honest answer forget it. They can't even answer the original question: What did he do other than boink underage boys to get his face on a stamp?This is one of those "repeat a lie enough and people will start believing it" threads, isn't it?PO should not be elevating a twisted sick pedophile such as milk.
What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys.....hint: not jerry sandusky
He was gay.
No, it isn't. You are lying. Now, why would you want to do that when it's unnecessary? There was grass on the field, not something pedos like eh?That is simply untrue. Use your words, correctly.Umm yes, he was. A FAG pedophile, the worst kind.He wasn't a pedophile.
Uh...yeah...it is.
Gramps, your definition of pedophilia is inaccurate is the point. Objective, mature adults use words according to their defined meanings.WTF is with you lefties trying to redefine all the deviant & ILLEGAL behavior in our nation?He wasn't a pedophile.
The hell he wasn't
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Supposedly Milk was attracted to boys/men in their late teens and early twenties. Still not cool - it's under age and he was a good bit older - but not pedophilia.
Since that is the topic of this thread, WTF are you doing responding to it? Stupid?Close enough for USMB.Harvey Milk
Remind me why we should honor a pedophile who's main contribution to human history was getting gunned down?
![]()
He wasn't a pedophile unless you use the Zeitgeist definition meaning someone into having sex with teenagers. But in actuality that'd be hebephile, not pedophile (which traditionally means someone under age 12.)
If we allow the Zeitgeist version then rockers like Ted Nugent are "pedophiles" too. And public figures like Phil Robertson advocate pedophilia when he says men should marry 16 year-olds.
Now tell me why Milk deserves a stamp.
That's another question and not one I'm qualified to answer not having used a stamp since...Hmm...![]()
Like MARRIAGE?Bullshit. Pedophilia=sex with underage people. Under 18 is underage in most places.
Thank goodness nobody is redefining words....
WTF is with you lefties trying to redefine all the deviant & ILLEGAL behavior in our nation?He wasn't a pedophile.
The hell he wasn't
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Supposedly Milk was attracted to boys/men in their late teens and early twenties. Still not cool - it's under age and he was a good bit older - but not pedophilia.
Then you have no dog in this fight now do you?Im not taking issue with the PO. I don't use them.He wasn't either, and you can take your issue up with the Post Office. My bet is they've published a Christopher Columbus stamp and he committed genocide.He was the first openly gay elected official of any importance in this country. Hardly matters now but it was a big deal then. You had to be there as they say.If you're expecting an honest answer forget it. They can't even answer the original question: What did he do other than boink underage boys to get his face on a stamp?
Theres nothing special about electing some sexual deviant who preys upon underage boys. Only freaks would honor him.
The word means the same thing, who can use it is expanding, that's all.Like MARRIAGE?Bullshit. Pedophilia=sex with underage people. Under 18 is underage in most places.
Thank goodness nobody is redefining words....
I used my words PERFECTLY.WTF is with you right-wingers being unable to use words correctly?WTF is with you lefties trying to redefine all the deviant & ILLEGAL behavior in our nation?He wasn't a pedophile.
The hell he wasn't
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Supposedly Milk was attracted to boys/men in their late teens and early twenties. Still not cool - it's under age and he was a good bit older - but not pedophilia.
I am not against gay rights... But it is annoying as hell when people will not be honest due to pushing an agenda and will actually prop up creeps that are child predators. This is one of those cases.
I'm pushing an agenda? Because I pointed out that someone's argument was bullshit? People are saying that bad actions are magically worse when done by a gay person, and I'm the one pushing an agenda?Bitch, pleaaaaaase.
Nope. Jerry Lee Lewis and Michael Jackson were also creepy child predators for instance. And you will never see me defending them.
Unlike the left that props up sex offenders... Such as Roman Polanski,Bill Clinton and Harvey Milk.
Marriage is the uniting of two people. Get over it, hortysir.Like MARRIAGE?Bullshit. Pedophilia=sex with underage people. Under 18 is underage in most places.
Thank goodness nobody is redefining words....