Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View post#4...should I say more???Of course she is but by this time next week a "good" reason will be dreamed up to oppose her at all costs, don't expect too many replies on this until Monday when Rush and the like issue their marching orders.
I assume you mean a "racist" reason.
|
President Barack Obama on Saturday formally nominated Loretta Lynch, the federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, to become the next attorney general and the first black woman to lead the Justice Department. He urged the U.S. Senate to confirm her "without delay."
"It’s pretty hard to be more qualified for this job than Loretta,” Obama said in a White House press conference. "She is not about splash, she is about substance," he added.
More on Lynch the Associated Press below:
Obama Urges Senate To Confirm Loretta Lynch 'Without Delay'
She should be easily confirmed. She is a very qualified lady.
That's not racism that's covering your ass! If you were Obama would you trust a White AG to do your bidding?Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Well, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
Uh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?
technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
Uh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
You say you graduated from law school in 1984...the same year Lynch graduated? Well, then why don't you know that quotas were outlawed in 1978 with the USSC Bakke decision.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
Uh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
You say you graduated from law school in 1984...the same year Lynch graduated? Well, then why don't you know that quotas were outlawed in 1978 with the USSC Bakke decision.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
remind me if Harvard is a public university-like U of C
and they don't call them quotas but they are
she was given .5 added to her GPA, and 130 points to her LSAT
2003-2005 she was a member of the board of the Federal Reserve bank in NYC. How did that work out?
real racists think blacks need the standards lowered to compete against whites and asiansUh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
You say you graduated from law school in 1984...the same year Lynch graduated? Well, then why don't you know that quotas were outlawed in 1978 with the USSC Bakke decision.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
remind me if Harvard is a public university-like U of C
and they don't call them quotas but they are
she was given .5 added to her GPA, and 130 points to her LSAT
Got any "credible" proof? Of course, all white racists know that blacks are too inferior to be worthy of such schools as Harvard.
But a severe problem of credibility emerges with your alleged "quota" indictment concerning Ms Lynch. Harvard filed an amicus brief on the original 1978 Bakke ruling which emphasized its"holistic" admissions process that created a racially diverse student body without quotas. That was three years prior to Ms. Lynch's admission to Harvard law School in 1981.Uh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
You say you graduated from law school in 1984...the same year Lynch graduated? Well, then why don't you know that quotas were outlawed in 1978 with the USSC Bakke decision.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
remind me if Harvard is a public university-like U of C
and they don't call them quotas but they are
she was given .5 added to her GPA, and 130 points to her LSAT
But a severe problem of credibility emerges with your alleged "quota" indictment concerning Ms Lynch. Harvard filed an amicus brief on the original 1978 Bakke ruling which emphasized its"holistic" admissions process that created a racially diverse student body without quotas. That was three years prior to Ms. Lynch's admission to Harvard law School in 1981.Uh picking low qualified scum based on their skin color is typical of scum like you.
Obama being a stupid sack of shit picks another black when the majority of Americans didn't like Holder being a black racist. It shows he is stupid, racist and arrogant doubling down when he has ruined race relations.
Of course the racist picks another black to be AG......
Why do you have a problem with that?technically anyone with a law license is qualifiedWell, no...first of all she IS qualified. Secondly, she was hired by a Black president who needs a Black AG to cover his ass when needed!another affirmative action poster child whose main qualification was her race
we ned a superstar in that office, not a quota
You say you graduated from law school in 1984...the same year Lynch graduated? Well, then why don't you know that quotas were outlawed in 1978 with the USSC Bakke decision.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy. However, the court ruled that specific quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
remind me if Harvard is a public university-like U of C
and they don't call them quotas but they are
she was given .5 added to her GPA, and 130 points to her LSAT
Early life and education
Lynch was born in Greensboro, North Carolina on May 21, 1959. Her mother was a school librarian and her father was a Baptist minister.[3][4] As a child, she spent hours with her father, watching court proceedings in the courthouse of Durham, North Carolina. Her early fascination with court proceedings was compounded by stories of her grandfather, also a pastor, who devised his own version of the Underground Railroad, in the 1930s. He helped people flee to the north to escape persecution under the Jim Crow laws of the time.[5]
She earned a Bachelor of Arts in English and American literature from Harvard College in 1981[6] and a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1984.[7]
Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
She has a great background for the job.
Early life and education
Lynch was born in Greensboro, North Carolina on May 21, 1959. Her mother was a school librarian and her father was a Baptist minister.[3][4] As a child, she spent hours with her father, watching court proceedings in the courthouse of Durham, North Carolina. Her early fascination with court proceedings was compounded by stories of her grandfather, also a pastor, who devised his own version of the Underground Railroad, in the 1930s. He helped people flee to the north to escape persecution under the Jim Crow laws of the time.[5]
She earned a Bachelor of Arts in English and American literature from Harvard College in 1981[6] and a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1984.[7]
Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
She has a great background for the job.
she was an affirmative action poster child. is she really the best attorney in the US Dept of Justice for this job?
I was in the DOJ for 24 years, I never heard of this women. she certainly wasn't a superstar or even one of the top people