AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,642
- 9,284
just all her paid Russian "sources" oddly get charged with lying
Who? There were no Steely sources that were accused of peddling Russian government misinformation. You are full of shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just all her paid Russian "sources" oddly get charged with lying
yes it was debunked bessie the “data” was a lie. Clinton lied, you fell for it
Lying to FBI about spreading Russian government misinformation? Nope moron.MARTINEZ: Now, the Justice Department has charged that key source for the dossier, Russian analyst Igor Danchenko, with lying the FBI. What does this mean for news stories that relied on his claims?
are you literally not reading my post and the links? Why?Who? There were no Steely sources that were accused of peddling Russian government misinformation. You are full of shit.
That's not what Durham said. Read the linkNope, the data showed there was a connection. You're the liar, not the data. To this day, no one has ever shown the data was false or wrong. To this day, the people who obtained that data still stand by it.
Durham? I literally posted a link citing the witnesses and their testimony showing that CLinton ordered the propaganda be leaked to the press
if it's not true, it's fake.That doesn't make the data fake.
![]()
Yep...the Russian agent paid by the Clinton campaign is a liar. Which is to be expectedLying to FBI about spreading Russian government misinformation? Nope moron.
From in or about January 2017 through in or about November 2017, and as part of its efforts to determine the truth or falsity of specific information in the Company Reports, the FBI conducted several interviews of DANCHENKO regarding, among other things, the information that DANCHENKO had provided to U.K. Person-I (collectively, the "Interviews"). 9. As alleged in further detail below, DANCHENKO lied to FBI agents during these Interviews. 10. First, DANCHENKO stated falsely that he had never communicated with a particular U.S.-based individual - who was a long-time participant in Democratic Party politics and was then an executive at a U.S. public relations firm ("PR Executive-I") - about any allegations contained in the Company Reports. In truth and in fact, and as DANCHENKO well knew, DANCHENKO sourced one or more specific allegations in the Company Reports anonymously to PR Executive-I.
Second, DANCHENKO stated falsely during the Interviews, that, in or about late July 2016, he received an anonymous phone call from an individual....In truth and fact, and as DANCHENKO well knew, DANCHENKO never received such a phone call or such information from any person
Danchenko was indicted (NOT CONVICTED) for falsefly testifying about his communications with Americans. And there is nothing in the indictment accusing him of peddling any Russin gov disinformation.
Lying to FBI about WHAT? Talking to some Americans?are you literally not reading my post and the links? Why?
Let's try another post: Steele dossier source arrested in Durham probe
Steele dossier source arrested in Durham probe
Researcher Igor Danchenko is charged with five counts of false statements in an inquiry into the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation.
Clinton paid russian liars for misinformation.
It wasn't legit if it was russian propaganda.
She paid Russians, for misinformation, and then gleefully was putin's puppet spreading the lies....
That's not what Durham said. Read the link
if it's not true, it's fake.
What a Clown. Dopey Donald, the World’s Biggest Sore Loser just can’t move onShit's fixin' to get real, yo.
Case 2:22-cv-14102-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2022 Page 1 of 108
"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE SULLIVAN, JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E. MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS, GLENN SIMPSON, PETER FRITSCH, NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD., CHRISTOPHER STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO, NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES COMEY, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictitious and unknown entities), Defendants.
_________________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY The Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby serves his suit against the Defendants, Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee, DNC Services Corporation, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robert E. Mook..."
The lawsuit
lying to the fbi about his work for clinton pushing putin’s propagandaLying to FBI about WHAT? Talking to some Americans?
Thats your proof that Clinton was spreading Russian government misinformation? Seriously idiot?
haha why do you refuse to read. links? I provided Durhams indictment highlighting the data was fakeThe data appears to be true as it's never been shown otherwise. Claims about the data being nefarious might be untrue, but the data showed a direct connection between Trump and Alfa Bank. That has never been debunked.
Your inability to show it was is now even more evidence the data is real.
Oops, looks like someone hasn't been following the news...lying to the fbi about his work for clinton pushing putin’s propaganda
No you didn't liar. If you did, you would be able to QUOTE Durham's indictment saying anything of the sort.haha why do you refuse to read. links? I provided Durhams indictment highlighting the data was fake
Igor go to trial yet?Oops, looks like someone hasn't been following the news...
No you didn't liar. If you did, you would be able to QUOTE Durham's indictment saying anything of the sort.
Nowhere in the indictment does Durham say the data was fake.