HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
- Dec 15, 2010
- 87,359
- 37,492
Sorry libs...dont really give a shit about homos.
We have far more important things to worry about.
We have far more important things to worry about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
and you thought he was with you....Only an idiot of biblical proportions would think that gay marriage is actually "settled". Nothing is ever "settled". Just ask the 2nd Amendment.
If Trump does his job properly (and I highly doubt that he will), then gay marriage is going away by a Supreme Court which actually upholds and respects the U.S. Constitution.
and you thought he was with you....Only an idiot of biblical proportions would think that gay marriage is actually "settled". Nothing is ever "settled". Just ask the 2nd Amendment.
If Trump does his job properly (and I highly doubt that he will), then gay marriage is going away by a Supreme Court which actually upholds and respects the U.S. Constitution.
Uh....no I didn't sweetie. And you know that. So why the lies and why the fake laugh over someone you're losing your shit over.and you thought he was with you....Only an idiot of biblical proportions would think that gay marriage is actually "settled". Nothing is ever "settled". Just ask the 2nd Amendment.
If Trump does his job properly (and I highly doubt that he will), then gay marriage is going away by a Supreme Court which actually upholds and respects the U.S. Constitution.
Absolutely. Progressives have desperately trying to do that for years with the 2nd Amendment. Anything can be overturned.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
Matthew, run over to your neighbors and ask them for large amounts of their retirement fund. Grow some balls.thank you Milo for your one-man lobbying effort!
Anyone can believe in right to marriage or right to health care, or right to life
as a Political Belief.
But that doesn't mean people consent to judges and federal authorities
making it law for everyone.
That is their opinion of course...One day I hope to have single payer in this country with free college like in countries like Germany.
It has changed many times.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
Doubt that will happen. During the election cycle he told everyone they can use whatever restroom they want at Trump TowerIt is "settled law" and there is nothing the president can do about it. However, president Trump can void the ridiculous Obama executive order that tried to force people to accept men in the ladies room and confused boys in the girls locker room.
idb someone else already answered literally, that yes this can change.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
Super_LanternDoubt that will happen. During the election cycle he told everyone they can use whatever restroom they want at Trump TowerIt is "settled law" and there is nothing the president can do about it. However, president Trump can void the ridiculous Obama executive order that tried to force people to accept men in the ladies room and confused boys in the girls locker room.
Why wouldn't Emily want to marry a dude?thank you Milo for your one-man lobbying effort!
Anyone can believe in right to marriage or right to health care, or right to life
as a Political Belief.
But that doesn't mean people consent to judges and federal authorities
making it law for everyone.
Well it's not like you have to HAVE to marry a dude .
So...you can be confident that he's not going to force anyone to marry someone of the same sex?Trump never said that he was agsinst gay marriage. That's why it was quite surprising when the left made up all the homophobia nonsense.
What he did say was that he would protect the Christian right to practice their religion.
Are you really saying that conservatives have never criticised SCOTUS rulings?idb someone else already answered literally, that yes this can change.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
but in practice these days,
it seems the trend has been
if the court rules in favor of what liberals want, then the court is right.
So cases such as ACA and right to marriage, then this is considered "law."
And if they don't, as with the court ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, they're wrong!
this is what happens when political beliefs are left to the govt to decide.
idb if you REALLY want a stable decision, the right one would be
for govt to REJECT to make such decisions on laws that involve
beliefs, whether religious or political. If these were relegated to
STATES and people to decide, then it would be up to legislative
process how to write or revise laws, and then of course they can change.
Are you really saying that states never make decisions based on religion or politics?idb someone else already answered literally, that yes this can change.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
but in practice these days,
it seems the trend has been
if the court rules in favor of what liberals want, then the court is right.
So cases such as ACA and right to marriage, then this is considered "law."
And if they don't, as with the court ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, they're wrong!
this is what happens when political beliefs are left to the govt to decide.
idb if you REALLY want a stable decision, the right one would be
for govt to REJECT to make such decisions on laws that involve
beliefs, whether religious or political. If these were relegated to
STATES and people to decide, then it would be up to legislative
process how to write or revise laws, and then of course they can change.
Great news! Personal freedom!
I hope he comes out and fights for the legalization of pot next.
Surely the job of the SCOTUS is determining whether a law is constitutional or not.idb someone else already answered literally, that yes this can change.Can the SCOTUS determine that a law that has been judged constitutional by a previous SCOTUS is now un-constitutional?
Surely something is either constitutional or it isn't...how can that change?
Is it a fashion thing...like flared jeans?
but in practice these days,
it seems the trend has been
if the court rules in favor of what liberals want, then the court is right.
So cases such as ACA and right to marriage, then this is considered "law."
And if they don't, as with the court ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby, they're wrong!
this is what happens when political beliefs are left to the govt to decide.
idb if you REALLY want a stable decision, the right one would be
for govt to REJECT to make such decisions on laws that involve
beliefs, whether religious or political. If these were relegated to
STATES and people to decide, then it would be up to legislative
process how to write or revise laws, and then of course they can change.