NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
I am waiting for my apology NY carbineer.
I am not looking at the 'wrong' data. I am citing the more demographically relevant data.
you are dishonest and speaking with you is a dead loss, this is the third time at least you've popped off and decided to get vulgar and fling around accusations etc.
hey, do what you will , but, thats why you never wind up maintaining a civil conversation, and I think you do it on purpose, you cannot even comprehend the English language or a simple poll, so when you get ownded, which hapens frequently you respond with strawman or vulgarity, which is tantamount to covering your ears and yelling blah blah blah...infantile.
go read the single sentence they typed at the top of that data set and questions starting on page 56, those q's were not for calc in the poll, thats why they were phrased very loosely, the data set to calc. that results in that 60% were from the chart I posted , from page 37.
your latest defense makes no sense, what you say you now cited for whatever reason has no bearing on the poll sampling as to the result they accrued, and used in their release, they over sampled dems, slice it anyway you like and that is a fact, period.
The best of winning an argument with a rightwing nut is that rightwing nut code of never being able to admit when you're wrong. I call it the icing on the cake.
So let me ask you this:
If the poll had been 33% Republican, 33% Democrat, and 33% Independent, would you consider that a fair sampling?