Sexual attraction is a disposition.Um, race was used as an analogy.I didnt dodge it - in FACT, I elaborated on why the two were made analogous.......they're both dispositions outside of your conscious control.There....
WAs...
No...
question.
But don't apologize. It's in the quote chain.
Dodging the statement then, you literalist fuck.
Unless you're going to tell me that your brain can tell your dick to get a boner for a tree if you really really wanted it to.
No, you ignore my point that while most religions have a taboo on homosexual acts, most also don't promote racism. That makes your appeal to the race card invalid when discussing this school in particular, and most religious schools.
Do you know the function of the tool we call "analogy?"
The analogous properties were that both race and sexual attraction are not consciously decided.....and the analogy flows from there.
You're dismissing the analogy because this church isnt racist - when that's completely besides the point.
Why is this like talking to 12 year olds?
One is a behavior, one is skin color.
You keep ignoring that most religions say the behavior of homosexuality is sinful. Unless you feel like making government force religions to change that, it is always going to be true.
Acting on your attraction is a behavior.
Homosexuality refers to the disposition of liking the same sex. Homosexual ACTS refer to the behavior.