Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw the video on Hannity. It ain't my problem if you and yours are too craven to man up to the truth which includes reality. You Demmies are lost in space with natratives sans proof. Plz stop making me tired with your trite drivel. Thx ahead of time.
He's biased for the defense.As the judge, himself, pointed out, he's biased for the Constitution.
Nope...not even.He's biased for the defense.
Judge is biased for the defense. Whoever picked the prosecutor is biased to the defense, if they aren't just pretending to be that bad. These things aren't just a coincidence.Nope...not even.
He has remained impartial...it's just that the prosecutor is doing a lousy job and is difficult to work with. He has tried several times to subvert the laws and rights of the accused, has come to court grossly unprepared, and has not made reasoned arguments.
It's almost to the point where I could do better...and I've never been to law school.
That's why the judge seems one sided...he isn't. It's just the defense team is organized and provides well written and extremely logical arguments...and has provided the court with lots of resources. (Including the Prosecutor's whole summation)
The fate of the shooter is of minimum importance compared to a non guilty verdict that will lower the bar on justifying murder.
Interesting too that two similar cases are in progress at the same time. Can the timing be arranged to coincide closely to give the effect of one or the other being of no importance.
Qanon and other bad actors are waiting impatiently for the prospect of a license to kill. IMO.
You keep making unsubstantiated accusations.Judge is biased for the defense. Whoever picked the prosecutor is biased to the defense, if they aren't just pretending to be that bad. These things aren't just a coincidence.
Zimenski had a gun, pointed it and shot at Kyle while Rosenbaum chased him.Calling me a "Demmie" simply because I'm not trying to suck Rittenhouse's dick like you are is stupid. I'm an Independent, leaning conservative. I voted for Trump twice. So go fuck yourself.
Show me video or a photo of Rosenbaum and/or skateboard boy pointing a gun at Rittenhouse.
You can't do it, but you're too big of a chickenshit to simply admit that...
yet, the prosecution can't seem to make a case and continue to embarass themselves.Calling me a "Demmie" simply because I'm not trying to suck Rittenhouse's dick like you are is stupid. I'm an Independent, leaning conservative. I voted for Trump twice. So go fuck yourself.
Show me video or a photo of Rosenbaum and/or skateboard boy pointing a gun at Rittenhouse.
You can't do it, but you're too big of a chickenshit to simply admit that...
I wouldn’t be surprised if that happened more.Wrong on virtually every count. By your logic, every time a person fires his gun in self-defense, others should make the assumption that he's an active shooter and shoot him. Then, of course, the next layer of the onion would assume that those shooters are active shooters and shoot them.
That’s the way our court system works.You don't have a problem with the government putting a person through a trial - a trial where it is always a possibility that an errant jury might find them guilty, when the government knows the person committed no crime, just because people are dead?
I have a real problem with the government making politically-based charges and putting a person through a trial for their life, and then violating the Constitution and Supreme Court precedence over and over again to make the false charges stick.
Then charge him for that....not murder...this was self defense....I’m a conservative and I don’t want to see a place where we condone or encourage juvenile vigilantes to roam the streets acting as cops.
That's America's ambition. To set the bar so low on self defense claims that even Chauvin's murder in broad daylight with video and several witnesses, can be allowed to happen.Self defense is not murder.
All 3 live or have lived in Chicago.The Place where Obama'sFarrakhan, Obama and the like are cut from the same cloth.
If vigilante justice is discouraged with a lengthy sentence for Rittenhouse, there could be the desired effect of discouraging it in the same way the police have been somewhat tamed by the Chauvin verdict.Your point is very accurate. Had guns been outlawed and then Rittenhouse had put out the fire started by a communist revolutionary, the death count would have been one - with potential multiple causes: Beaten to death by skateboard, head kicked in on the pavement, and shot by a felon in possession of an illegal handgun.
Yes, the body count would be less but the wrong person would be dead.
Please demonstrate your rational basis for this claim.That's America's ambition. To set the bar so low on self defense claims that even Chauvin's murder in broad daylight with video and several witnesses, can be allowed to happen.
Does the Supreme Court have the authority to change the Constitution? And, if not, how then do you account for when the Supreme Court reverses itself? Did the Constitution change? Did the Court change the Constitution? Or were they wrong in one or the other decision?That's one of the more bizarre comments I've seen made in this thread.
When the Supreme Court speaks, whether you "believe" what the Court says is of no consequence. When the Court speaks, that's pretty much the last word...
Sure he was...
