Protests in 30+ Cities Against Rump Bigotry EO

[playtime]

Where does it say that?

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Good, let Americans know who is on their side. And who is their enemy.

Jefferson would not have considered protesting to let in hostile groups who like to randomly murder US, to be patriotism.

not one terrorist act carried out here was from one of those countries on the list. nice try though.

So? .????????.? .

 

[defcon4]

Where these "protesters" are coming from? Don't they have jobs? Apparently, if they have jobs they are paid protesters making an extra buck on the side or freeloaders on welfare making an extra buck on the side. The age of cell phones...being on-call. Soros pays them. He needs to be investigated and charged under
18 U.S. Code § 2101 - Riots

On our planet we call this a "weekend".

Let's see about this tomorrow and we shall readdress the issue...

 

[playtime]

I don't get this. Where does our constitution say that everyone else on the planet, has some sort of right to come to this country, and be a citizen? Where does anything say this?

And if there is no right to be a US citizen, then no rights are violated.

If no rights are violated...... what the heck are you protesting?

the crux is the denial of entry for refugees based on their religion. muslims are denied, whereas christians will not be & in fact, they will be favored. that is unconstitutional.

From the text:

b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.

Full text of Trump's executive order on 7-nation ban, refugee suspension - CNNPolitics.com

Muslims persecute other Muslims for being the wrong kind of Muslim . will the persecuted Muslims get favoritism?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Where does it say that?

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

Judicial can interpret the law, but the executive enforces it. I suggest Trump nor enforce the unconstitutional interpretation of law by that ultra liberal judge.

 

[Andylusion]

I don't get this. Where does our constitution say that everyone else on the planet, has some sort of right to come to this country, and be a citizen? Where does anything say this?

And if there is no right to be a US citizen, then no rights are violated.

If no rights are violated...... what the heck are you protesting?

the crux is the denial of entry for refugees based on their religion. muslims are denied, whereas christians will not be & in fact, they will be favored. that is unconstitutional.

Where? When you are a citizen, then yes, the government has legal constraints.

I get that. When you are a citizen of the country, then you get the rights granted by the constitution, for citizens.

None of who we are talking about, are citizens. Do you see anyone who wrote our constitution, ever arguing that people in Britain had US citizen rights.... in Britain? No. It's ridiculous.

The constitution clearly says the Federal government has the right to determine the requirements for entering the country.

There is nothing unconstitutional about it. There is no "right to be a US citizen" in the constitution, and thus no rights are being violated.

You claim is false. Try again.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Top Scholars Say Trump Muslim Immigrant Ban May Be Constitutional

Almost every public figure appraising Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s proposed moratorium on Muslim immigration and travel to the U.S. has reacted with horror, but the ban would not necessarily be unconstitutional, experts say.

Recent U.S. immigration history, in fact, is full of examples of discrimination against minority groups. Throughout the Cold War, non-citizen socialists were deported, and gays could be booted as "sexual deviants" until 1990. An entry ban on HIV-positive people wasn't fully repealed until 2010.

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-muslim-immigrant-ban-could-be-constitutional

 

[EverCurious]

You shouldn't defend Pogo Emily, you're hurting your rep.

Post #57 by him is a blatant lie. Trump doesn't have /any/ business interests at all - he resigned from /everything/ in order to serve the American people.

playtime in other words, because of MSM lies we think Trumps a bigot. So ALCU is basing their entire case on media slander, how cute. G'luck to them spinning that to a judge who cannot take slander as truth, and has to rule based on reality.

 

[defcon4]

Just a side note, The Bill of Rights does not grant any rights to citizens. It acknowledges citizens' unalienable rights and limits the government in its actions in attempting to curtail those unalienable rights.

 

[playtime]

Where does it say that?

We’ll See You in Court: Why Trump’s Executive Order on Refugees Violates the Establishment Clause

Judicial can interpret the law, but the executive enforces it. I suggest Trump nor enforce the unconstitutional interpretation of law by that ultra liberal judge.

weren't there a few EO of obama's that were ruled unconstitutional ? i'm SURE you wanted him to not enforce the 'interpretation' of law by the uber conservative judge that thought otherwise...riiiiiiiiiight?

 

[Pogo]

I don't get this. Where does our constitution say that everyone else on the planet, has some sort of right to come to this country, and be a citizen? Where does anything say this?

And if there is no right to be a US citizen, then no rights are violated.

If no rights are violated...... what the heck are you protesting?

the crux is the denial of entry for refugees based on their religion. muslims are denied, whereas christians will not be & in fact, they will be favored. that is unconstitutional.

From the text:

b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.

Full text of Trump's executive order on 7-nation ban, refugee suspension - CNNPolitics.com

Muslims persecute other Muslims for being the wrong kind of Muslim . will the persecuted Muslims get favoritism?

His actual words ---which he scrubbed from his website in early December --- were:

"Donald J. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."

He didn't say "shutdown of Wahabbis", which persecute Sufis and which would have covered the 9/11 (or in Rumpese, "7/11") hijackers; he says Muslims generally. And now he's saying it's not banning Muslims so on one end or the other, he's calling himself a liar.

My favorite part of that quote is still "figure out what the hell is going on". Not just because it's so awesomely specific, but he actually worked into a campaign speech the fact that he hasn't bothered to figure out what the hell is going on.

 

[playtime]

You shouldn't defend Pogo Emily, you're hurting your rep.

Post #57 by him is a blatant lie. Trump doesn't have /any/ business interests at all - he resigned from /everything/ in order to serve the American people.

playtime in other words, because of MSM lies we think Trumps a bigot. So ALCU is basing their entire case on media slander, how cute. G'luck to them spinning that to a judge who cannot take slander as truth, and has to rule based on reality.

trump has been a bigot since his early days with daddy drumpf being sued by the feds for housing discrimination.

 

[EverCurious]

Guess what, no. Your media lied to you son.

 

[playtime]

I don't get this. Where does our constitution say that everyone else on the planet, has some sort of right to come to this country, and be a citizen? Where does anything say this?

And if there is no right to be a US citizen, then no rights are violated.

If no rights are violated...... what the heck are you protesting?

the crux is the denial of entry for refugees based on their religion. muslims are denied, whereas christians will not be & in fact, they will be favored. that is unconstitutional.

Where? When you are a citizen, then yes, the government has legal constraints.

I get that. When you are a citizen of the country, then you get the rights granted by the constitution, for citizens.

None of who we are talking about, are citizens. Do you see anyone who wrote our constitution, ever arguing that people in Britain had US citizen rights.... in Britain? No. It's ridiculous.

The constitution clearly says the Federal government has the right to determine the requirements for entering the country.

There is nothing unconstitutional about it. There is no "right to be a US citizen" in the constitution, and thus no rights are being violated.

You claim is false. Try again.

i never said they have a right to be US citizens. i said denying the entry based on religion is. try comprehending.

 

[EverCurious]

The denial is not based on religion, you're spreading a media lie. it is based on the nations that Congress and the previous administration (Obama's administration) found to have the most terrorists.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Despite American liberals, no one from another country has a right to come to America and demand citizenship, or demand to stay.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I don't get this. Where does our constitution say that everyone else on the planet, has some sort of right to come to this country, and be a citizen? Where does anything say this?

And if there is no right to be a US citizen, then no rights are violated.

If no rights are violated...... what the heck are you protesting?

the crux is the denial of entry for refugees based on their religion. muslims are denied, whereas christians will not be & in fact, they will be favored. that is unconstitutional.

Where? When you are a citizen, then yes, the government has legal constraints.

I get that. When you are a citizen of the country, then you get the rights granted by the constitution, for citizens.

None of who we are talking about, are citizens. Do you see anyone who wrote our constitution, ever arguing that people in Britain had US citizen rights.... in Britain? No. It's ridiculous.

The constitution clearly says the Federal government has the right to determine the requirements for entering the country.

There is nothing unconstitutional about it. There is no "right to be a US citizen" in the constitution, and thus no rights are being violated.

You claim is false. Try again.

i never said they have a right to be US citizens. i said denying the entry based on religion is. try comprehending.

And as I have pointed out and you continue to ignore, is that it may NOT be unconstitutional.

 

[EverCurious]

It's IRRELEVANT. The denial has /nothing/ to do with religion why even debate their lies?

 

[esthermoon]

As far as I know it's a ban on countries in some way dangerous for the United States.
I don't get the word "bigotry".
It's not a ban for all Muslims (that's what I've heard about this executive order; even here our news talk about that )

 

[Indeependent]

Say goodbye to the US being everybody's bank account.