iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
you wanna wordsmith, i'll played. just doesn't seem to go as well coming back at you as it does going out does it?you must be a clinton the way you look for loopholes for bad behavior.it's above in this very message you seem to be choosing to ignore. i cited (4) relevant laws you were asking for and her failure on each one - you somehow missed my providing you exactly what you requested.this is just funny anymore.
why did she need her own server? if she must have it - fine. there were laws she needed to follow if she were to use this for official purposes.
did she ever use it for official purposes? if so, she is now liable for the information and retention laws that are in place.
did she follow those?
you keep trying to distance her from the body as if she had nothing to do with it but i'm pretty sure you'd not allow "the other side" to do the same.
I have no idea why she "needed" her own server. You'll have to ask her about that.
As for "information and retention laws", which laws are you referring to? Please, quote the statute.
good job.
You cited one law, and I pointed out the required mens rea elements, which are clearly missing in this case. The rest were departmental regulations, not laws.
and you continue to fall back on "but she didn't mean it". of which you can't ever provide evidence for or prove in the same manner you're asking others to do.
now what?
I have not once stated "she didn't mean it" - that's you guys, twisting my words around.