🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Putin is pasty and shaken in latest interview

When Tea Party Putin isn't killing Journalists, Lawyers, Opponents, beating up Girl Bands and shooting down Malaysian planes while trying to reconstitute the Soviet Union..

He's wowing the Conservatives in America with his Pasty pecs and horse riding skillz..son!

:D

You are displaying your normal partisan idiocy. Acknowledging that Putin has more leadership qualities than obozo does not mean that anyone agrees with his policies and actions. Hitler was a leader, so were Chavez, Castro, Mao, Idi Amin, and Pol Pot.

Recognizing the leadership abilities of despots and dictators does not equate to agreeing with their policies.

But you left wing fools acknowledge obama's lack of leadership but still worship him----liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

You've just named dictators and thugs, as "leaders". And there are many leadership styles.

There are "administrative" type leaders, who generally are there as "tie breakers" when consensus fails. There are "executive" type leaders, who make decisions based on the best information they can get from expert. And there are dictators, who lead top down. My way or the highway.

Obama is a blend of administrative/executive.

Putin is a dictator.

And you seem to prefer the latter.

You just refuse to get it. Obama has not shown leadership. A leader would bring the two sides together to find the middle ground and move the country forward.

His only significant piece of legislation (obamacare) was passed by dems only in the most corrupt way possible. There was no attempt at finding a compromise, he rammed it through like a DICTATOR.

Where are the budget bills? The house has passed one or more every year, Reid has not let a single one hit the floor of the senate. Obama has not attempted to work a compromise. ZERO leadership.

Deal with the reality that you elected. You libs own this mess.
 
Of course not. But he is a leader and a man. Is obama YOUR kind of leader and your kind of man?

President Obama's been doing a fine job as leader. And by all metrics? He seems a good family man, moral, patient, with a high degree of intelligence.

His leadership has helped America's economy rebound, saw real live terrorists killed and eliminated and got the US out of Iraq, which was a terrible mess.

Putin on the other hand, is presiding over a failing economy, world wide scorn and is turning his nation into a Pariah.

You might admire that?

The rest of the world, does not.

OMG, you are totally disconnected from reality. Must be that defective liberal gene.

obama's leadership is an oxymoron. How many national budgets has his "leadership" produced in the last 5 years? How about his leadership on the border? leadership in Syria? Obama is a national joke and an international embarrassment.

You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.
 
President Obama's been doing a fine job as leader. And by all metrics? He seems a good family man, moral, patient, with a high degree of intelligence.

His leadership has helped America's economy rebound, saw real live terrorists killed and eliminated and got the US out of Iraq, which was a terrible mess.

Putin on the other hand, is presiding over a failing economy, world wide scorn and is turning his nation into a Pariah.

You might admire that?

The rest of the world, does not.

OMG, you are totally disconnected from reality. Must be that defective liberal gene.

obama's leadership is an oxymoron. How many national budgets has his "leadership" produced in the last 5 years? How about his leadership on the border? leadership in Syria? Obama is a national joke and an international embarrassment.

You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

There can be no consensus on the border until obama enforces it, and he has refused to do that. Why does he want the USA to have open borders? What is the real agenda?

Syria agreed to destroy its chemical weapons due to pressure from Putin, not obama. Whether they actually did is questionable.

Obama is a joke to the international community. He has zero respect from both our friends and our enemies. The world is in turmoil when the USA has a weak and indecisive president.
 
President Obama's been doing a fine job as leader. And by all metrics? He seems a good family man, moral, patient, with a high degree of intelligence.

His leadership has helped America's economy rebound, saw real live terrorists killed and eliminated and got the US out of Iraq, which was a terrible mess.

Putin on the other hand, is presiding over a failing economy, world wide scorn and is turning his nation into a Pariah.

You might admire that?

The rest of the world, does not.

OMG, you are totally disconnected from reality. Must be that defective liberal gene.

obama's leadership is an oxymoron. How many national budgets has his "leadership" produced in the last 5 years? How about his leadership on the border? leadership in Syria? Obama is a national joke and an international embarrassment.

You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

on the national budget. When congress cannot come to an agreement it is the JOB of the president to get the sides together and MEDIATE a compromise. It is his JOB and obama either does not understand that or does not want to do it.
 
OMG, you are totally disconnected from reality. Must be that defective liberal gene.

obama's leadership is an oxymoron. How many national budgets has his "leadership" produced in the last 5 years? How about his leadership on the border? leadership in Syria? Obama is a national joke and an international embarrassment.

You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

There can be no consensus on the border until obama enforces it, and he has refused to do that. Why does he want the USA to have open borders? What is the real agenda?

Syria agreed to destroy its chemical weapons due to pressure from Putin, not obama. Whether they actually did is questionable.

Obama is a joke to the international community. He has zero respect from both our friends and our enemies. The world is in turmoil when the USA has a weak and indecisive president.


not ONE POTUS has ever took a hard stand on our borders NOT ONE .. so its only fair you blame it all on Obama :eusa_whistle:
 
You are displaying your normal partisan idiocy. Acknowledging that Putin has more leadership qualities than obozo does not mean that anyone agrees with his policies and actions. Hitler was a leader, so were Chavez, Castro, Mao, Idi Amin, and Pol Pot.

Recognizing the leadership abilities of despots and dictators does not equate to agreeing with their policies.

But you left wing fools acknowledge obama's lack of leadership but still worship him----liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

You've just named dictators and thugs, as "leaders". And there are many leadership styles.

There are "administrative" type leaders, who generally are there as "tie breakers" when consensus fails. There are "executive" type leaders, who make decisions based on the best information they can get from expert. And there are dictators, who lead top down. My way or the highway.

Obama is a blend of administrative/executive.

Putin is a dictator.

And you seem to prefer the latter.

You just refuse to get it. Obama has not shown leadership. A leader would bring the two sides together to find the middle ground and move the country forward.

His only significant piece of legislation (obamacare) was passed by dems only in the most corrupt way possible. There was no attempt at finding a compromise, he rammed it through like a DICTATOR.

Where are the budget bills? The house has passed one or more every year, Reid has not let a single one hit the floor of the senate. Obama has not attempted to work a compromise. ZERO leadership.

Deal with the reality that you elected. You libs own this mess.

First off, sometimes that is not possible. President Lincoln is recognized by most in this country as a great President, yet, he was unable to get consensus in congress on many big issues. Which is why we had a civil war.

Secondly? That's patently untrue. President Obama ran on single payer or Medicare for all. The Republicans objected to that and instead wanted the Heritage foundation plan used by Mitt Romney. To their surprise? Obama agreed and THEN they changed that AGAIN. They put the bill into committee and were trying to kill it with additions. That's basically when Obama took the reigns and moved it out of committee. He wasn't going to let it die there. That's leadership by the way.

Third? We have 2 houses of congress, and an executive branch. The minority party should not be the one driving policy. The Ryan Budgets that congress sent to the Senate, effectively killed ObamaCare and were trying to kill SSI and Medicare. That, was patently unacceptable.

The GOP of late has been using the congress to create chaos in the government. They are trying to deconstruct decades of progress.

And that will not fly.
 
You really have a fixation on the man.

No, Republican do. he is their HERO.....SWOON.....

When Tea Party Putin isn't killing Journalists, Lawyers, Opponents, beating up Girl Bands and shooting down Malaysian planes while trying to reconstitute the Soviet Union..

He's wowing the Conservatives in America with his Pasty pecs and horse riding skillz..son!

:D

:lol::lol:

Thats really all it takes. They dont know shit about Putin other than he swims with his shirt off and rides horses...oh and shoots down a commercial plane full of innocent people...you know, like a MAN does. Real men always hit what cant hit back! ...or something
 
If a thread about the Ukraine/Russia conflict gets derailed onto Obama and his responsibilities about the budget ...

then it appears some folks are just totally fixated and unable to discuss anything else ....
 
President Obama's been doing a fine job as leader. And by all metrics? He seems a good family man, moral, patient, with a high degree of intelligence.

His leadership has helped America's economy rebound, saw real live terrorists killed and eliminated and got the US out of Iraq, which was a terrible mess.

Putin on the other hand, is presiding over a failing economy, world wide scorn and is turning his nation into a Pariah.

You might admire that?

The rest of the world, does not.

OMG, you are totally disconnected from reality. Must be that defective liberal gene.

obama's leadership is an oxymoron. How many national budgets has his "leadership" produced in the last 5 years? How about his leadership on the border? leadership in Syria? Obama is a national joke and an international embarrassment.

You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

Putin got Syria to destroy their chemical weapons and did it to rescue obama from being strangled by his own red line. There isn't a country in the world, nor any national leader that respects obama. By default the leadership of the free world has fallen to Angela Merkle and she just closed the American CIA office and threw our personnel out.

If it were true that obama commanded respect, that his word had any weight, Europe would not be ignoring him and turning their positive attentions to Russia looking to Vladimir Putin for some leadership instead. Surely Obama could have gotten ONE other country to go along with sanctions on Russia. Just one, instead of being told to take a hike. American ambassadors have been told to leave Ecuador, Venezuela, Russia, Egypt. Our friends no longer trust us and our enemies no longer respect us.
 
You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

There can be no consensus on the border until obama enforces it, and he has refused to do that. Why does he want the USA to have open borders? What is the real agenda?

Syria agreed to destroy its chemical weapons due to pressure from Putin, not obama. Whether they actually did is questionable.

Obama is a joke to the international community. He has zero respect from both our friends and our enemies. The world is in turmoil when the USA has a weak and indecisive president.


not ONE POTUS has ever took a hard stand on our borders NOT ONE .. so its only fair you blame it all on Obama :eusa_whistle:

I don't recall saying that obama was the only one to ignore the border, but he is the current president.

But once again, since you dodged my question, why does obama favor open borders for the USA?
 
There can be no consensus on the border until obama enforces it, and he has refused to do that. Why does he want the USA to have open borders? What is the real agenda?

Syria agreed to destroy its chemical weapons due to pressure from Putin, not obama. Whether they actually did is questionable.

Obama is a joke to the international community. He has zero respect from both our friends and our enemies. The world is in turmoil when the USA has a weak and indecisive president.


not ONE POTUS has ever took a hard stand on our borders NOT ONE .. so its only fair you blame it all on Obama :eusa_whistle:

I don't recall saying that obama was the only one to ignore the border, but he is the current president.

But once again, since you dodged my question, why does obama favor open borders for the USA?

Wow, so Obama should do what no other POTUS has done and since he cannot he's terrible but everyone else is cool?

Thats a severe case of Obama Derangement Syndrome. Fucking Obama...cant even do what no one else can. :eusa_boohoo:
 
You fail to recognize the type of government we have.

And that's why you wrong use the term "oxymoron".

The budgets are a task of congress. They have to come to consensus.

The "border" is part of the same problem. Congress failed to come to consensus under Bush or Obama.

Syria? Seriously?

President Obama got the Syrians to destroy their chemical weapons. That's a success. It's Putin that was embarrassed on the world stage.

President Obama has world wide respect. And it's basically the Tea Party here that thinks hes an "embarrassment". These are the very same folks that admire Putin.

So I don't give their opinion much credence.

There can be no consensus on the border until obama enforces it, and he has refused to do that. Why does he want the USA to have open borders? What is the real agenda?

Syria agreed to destroy its chemical weapons due to pressure from Putin, not obama. Whether they actually did is questionable.

Obama is a joke to the international community. He has zero respect from both our friends and our enemies. The world is in turmoil when the USA has a weak and indecisive president.


not ONE POTUS has ever took a hard stand on our borders NOT ONE .. so its only fair you blame it all on Obama :eusa_whistle:

Operation Wetback under Eisenhower.

We have never had an invasion like this under any other president in our history. We never had a president that wanted an invasion like this and actively worked to facilitate it.
 
You've just named dictators and thugs, as "leaders". And there are many leadership styles.

There are "administrative" type leaders, who generally are there as "tie breakers" when consensus fails. There are "executive" type leaders, who make decisions based on the best information they can get from expert. And there are dictators, who lead top down. My way or the highway.

Obama is a blend of administrative/executive.

Putin is a dictator.

And you seem to prefer the latter.

You just refuse to get it. Obama has not shown leadership. A leader would bring the two sides together to find the middle ground and move the country forward.

His only significant piece of legislation (obamacare) was passed by dems only in the most corrupt way possible. There was no attempt at finding a compromise, he rammed it through like a DICTATOR.

Where are the budget bills? The house has passed one or more every year, Reid has not let a single one hit the floor of the senate. Obama has not attempted to work a compromise. ZERO leadership.

Deal with the reality that you elected. You libs own this mess.

First off, sometimes that is not possible. President Lincoln is recognized by most in this country as a great President, yet, he was unable to get consensus in congress on many big issues. Which is why we had a civil war.

Secondly? That's patently untrue. President Obama ran on single payer or Medicare for all. The Republicans objected to that and instead wanted the Heritage foundation plan used by Mitt Romney. To their surprise? Obama agreed and THEN they changed that AGAIN. They put the bill into committee and were trying to kill it with additions. That's basically when Obama took the reigns and moved it out of committee. He wasn't going to let it die there. That's leadership by the way.

Third? We have 2 houses of congress, and an executive branch. The minority party should not be the one driving policy. The Ryan Budgets that congress sent to the Senate, effectively killed ObamaCare and were trying to kill SSI and Medicare. That, was patently unacceptable.

The GOP of late has been using the congress to create chaos in the government. They are trying to deconstruct decades of progress.

And that will not fly.

Bullshit, there were no GOP votes for obamacare, ZERO. So your bullshit position that obama, reid, and pelosi changed it to please the GOP is a massive LIE.

Trying to return the USA to the constitution and sane fiscal policy is not creating chaos. It is doing what needs to be done. Its the dems in the senate and the whitehouse that are creating chaos and doing nothing.
 
Putin is discovering that being a leader on an international stage is different than it was in the USSR

All actions have consequences and he is finding out first hand the impact that the western nations can have on a fragile economy.

Bullies did well in the USSR, but on the international stage there are significant consequences

Tough man Putin may poll well in Russia today but as economic sanctions affect the quality of life in Russia, he will feel the impact from the voters. More significantly, Putin will feel the pressure from the capitalists within Russia as they see their global markets drying up
 
so NOW the Russia/Ukraine conflict thread is "about" Obama and border security .....
and Obamacare
and the budget

seriously guys - you mean you haven't been able to find a thread to discuss those issues.

It is so tiresome that every time people try to have ANY discussion, a few folks have to DEMAND that EVERY discussion be about THEIR axes they want to grind.
 
Last edited:
not ONE POTUS has ever took a hard stand on our borders NOT ONE .. so its only fair you blame it all on Obama :eusa_whistle:

I don't recall saying that obama was the only one to ignore the border, but he is the current president.

But once again, since you dodged my question, why does obama favor open borders for the USA?

Wow, so Obama should do what no other POTUS has done and since he cannot he's terrible but everyone else is cool?

Thats a severe case of Obama Derangement Syndrome. Fucking Obama...cant even do what no one else can. :eusa_boohoo:


rather than be repetitive, see post #54, he covered it.
 
Putin is discovering that being a leader on an international stage is different than it was in the USSR

All actions have consequences and he is finding out first hand the impact that the western nations can have on a fragile economy.

Bullies did well in the USSR, but on the international stage there are significant consequences

Tough man Putin may poll well in Russia today but as economic sanctions affect the quality of life in Russia, he will feel the impact from the voters. More significantly, Putin will feel the pressure from the capitalists within Russia as they see their global markets drying up

Time will tell if Putin succeeds or fails. But obama's failure has already been established.

While Putin is trying to reconstitute the USSR, Obama is trying to destroy the USA.
 
Putin has the Russian economy doing just fine.

He is strengthening trading ties with China, India, and several other regional countries.

Plus starting to make inroads into Africa and South America. .. :cool:
 

Forum List

Back
Top