Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also we are told to repent, yet there are a few who hide behind the walls, so they wont be punished for their sins...Yet another thought comes to mind as well...........we are told to give, period........what the receiver does with said gift will fall on their shoulders, not ours IF we gave in good faith
That seems to be the main Catholic approach for those who support the Vatican lines; for them the Church is serving a purpose and following the ordained path, and no individual can change its course, corrupt or no. My personal opinion is they shouldn't tolerate it if they know of it, given many of the actions of Jesus and the Apostles, but I leave it to them to run their internal affairs; if they don't mind, I don't.
Wait......what shouldn't they tolerate? I'm guessing you mean the abuses??
If so.......we are told to forgive sins and judgement is His, not ours.
Charity like forgiving others benefits the one doing the giving as much or maybe even more than it does the one who receives it.
The Catholic Church has billions of dollars locked behind the doors of the Vatican, the pope eats lobster and steak, yet he tells the rest of us we should do without. When man made religion, not God, it was mans way to control us and reap from us, while they sit back and enjoy comfortable living...
They were just going about their business
They were not saying....send me money because I am an atheist
Yes, the business of lying, extortion, murder, and seizing governments and their treasuries, and accumulating personal power.
Jesus was a Socialist
Rubbish.
Back when Moses finally got the Hebrews out of Egypt and on their way to the promised land, Moses, who had a speech impediment, made Aaron(his brother) as the first priest of the new Israelites. For every sacrifice to God, one must give a sacrifice to Aaron in a tithe. At that moment Aaron never had to work at hard labor ever again.
I give to the Salvation Army, Habitat for Humanity and the Fisher House. I find those charitable organizations have a better record of providing for the poor, than the Uber wealthy Catholic Church.
At least they aren't housing a child rapist behind the Vatican walls.
That isn't my argument. That is you misstating my argument.Charity like forgiving others benefits the one doing the giving as much or maybe even more than it does the one who receives it.
So God makes some people miserable so that other people can feel better about themselves by giving them money after a church takes its cut?
seriously, is this what you are arguing?
The Catholic Church has billions of dollars locked behind the doors of the Vatican, the pope eats lobster and steak, yet he tells the rest of us we should do without. When man made religion, not God, it was mans way to control us and reap from us, while they sit back and enjoy comfortable living...
Do you actually have evidence the Pope is eating Lobster? Or is this just more of your crazy talk?
That isn't my argument. That is you misstating my argument.
Oh good grief....you should be a pretzel maker....If you do it right....It is the road to richesNothings says pastors and ministers have to live out of dumpsters or take oaths of poverty, and neither do Christians. Did you ever see the pastor's tax returns?Most, the vast majority, are not employees, they're 'private contractors' and pay their own SS and payroll taxes as 'self-employed'.
From reading the annual salary surveys of pastors and ministers, it's immediately obvious being a preacher is most definitely not The Road To Riches, despite the mythology and propaganda constantly spread around. There is even a rough formula for church founders to follow when paying a pastor, which is an average of around $8 a year for the average weekly attendance over the year. So, a church with a steady weekly attendance of 200 would likely not be paying a pastor anything at all, or very little. For well established churches, around $40K or so a year for a full time pastor who also manages the church's business and the like seems to be the ballpark compensation, which is still less than a company exec would pull down for a private business of similar size.
Obviously the vast majority aren't 'doing it right', then, so obviously they must be sincere, completely unlike Democrats and their Party leaders, and the vast majority of 'atheists' who post here. And, the vast majority of the wealthy ones aren't getting rich from tithes, salaries, etc., either; they have other sources of income, and most don't take a dime from their churches, so why does this concern atheists at all?
Sorry.....No money in atheism
Of course there is. You're just not admitting it. Ask Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and Wall Street about the wealth to be had via mindless self-indulgence and greed. Which one of the propagandists who entirely influence you and the other Democrats said this:
Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.
They were just going about their business
They were not saying....send me money because I am an atheist
Jesus was a Socialist
That isn't my argument. That is you misstating my argument.
I think I hit the nail pretty much on the head.
God doesn't need the money, according to you. He's FUCKING GOD!!!
No, no, the reason why we have charity is so that rich people can feel better about themselves giving a pittance to poorer people, who are only poor because God has put their their lives in a bad place to start with.
Again, the problem with the Abrahamic God is that he often comes off like a Batman Villian! Let's create a bad situation and have people make horrible choices.
You must have confused my post with someone else's. I wrote, "Charity like forgiving others benefits the one doing the giving as much or maybe even more than it does the one who receives it."That isn't my argument. That is you misstating my argument.
I think I hit the nail pretty much on the head.
God doesn't need the money, according to you. He's FUCKING GOD!!!
No, no, the reason why we have charity is so that rich people can feel better about themselves giving a pittance to poorer people, who are only poor because God has put their their lives in a bad place to start with.
Again, the problem with the Abrahamic God is that he often comes off like a Batman Villian! Let's create a bad situation and have people make horrible choices.
I'll have to take your word on that.Pedophiles have expense too.God loves a cheerful giver....If God wants the money.......He can take it
He wants us to give because we are happy to
God loves a cheerful giver....If God wants the money.......He can take it
He wants us to give because we are happy to
Dangle outta your own mouth too...let us know when someone strips it and you have bowed down to praise Jehovah for letting you know his words given through the prophets were true.God loves a cheerful giver....If God wants the money.......He can take it
He wants us to give because we are happy to
God has my bank account number and password
If he needs the money he is cheerfully welcome to take it
Dangle outta your own mouth too...let us know when someone strips it and you have bowed down to praise Jehovah for letting you know his words given through the prophets were true.God loves a cheerful giver....If God wants the money.......He can take it
He wants us to give because we are happy to
God has my bank account number and password
If he needs the money he is cheerfully welcome to take it