9/11 was just an excuse to invade whoever, as proven by Iraq. It didn't matter who actually flew the planes into the towers. The PNAC had an agenda and Bush helped them achieve it.
![eusa_boohoo :eusa_boohoo: :eusa_boohoo:](/styles/smilies/eusa_boohoo.gif)
You'll say anything for that welfare check, won't you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
9/11 was just an excuse to invade whoever, as proven by Iraq. It didn't matter who actually flew the planes into the towers. The PNAC had an agenda and Bush helped them achieve it.
Still butthurt that a Democrat got him? Tissue?
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
The military got him because Obama approved the mission to get him. Obama is the CiC. It was his call and he made it. He deserves all of the credit in the world for making that call.
Still butthurt that a Democrat got him? Tissue?
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
The military got him because Obama approved the mission to get him. Obama is the CiC. It was his call and he made it. He deserves all of the credit in the world for making that call.
You never heard anyone say Bush freed Iraq?
Either you're lying or you live in a cave with wifi....which means you're the first option
Have to hand it to liberals. They blame Bush for starting two wars AND brag about Obama killing Bin Laden for starting one of them.
Believe it or not, some how that makes sense to them.
Can you see their double talk. They are so fucking hypocritical and annoying.
He DID start two wars. Afghanistan was warranted; Iraq was not. That is the problem.
Keep painting with that broad brush.
W started the war? He invaded Afghanistan before 9/11? History says you are wrong. Your posts say you're stupid.
"What difference does it make?" Where have I heard that before?
Hillary said it for herself to escape blame for her actions. I said it to prevent the Taliban escaping blame for their actions. The context is the reverse. That you don't grasp the difference shows what an empty headed little shill you are.
Same with Obama
Actually..you are completely wrong there.
In the debates, Obama said if Bin Laden was in Pakistan? He'd take him out no matter what the consequences were. McCain said that was juvenile and foolish.
Well?
Obama activated a Covert Ops to find and kill Bin Laden.
That was all his doing.
And he was stupid to share credit with Bush..or anyone else, except the people involved.
The military got Bin Laden, not any politician. They looked for him under Bush and under Obama. That they found him under Obama was coincidence.
You never heard anyone say Bush freed Iraq?
Either you're lying or you live in a cave with wifi....which means you're the first option
Of course I did, what the fuck is wrong with you? .
What difference does that make? The Taliban assisted Al Qaeda. I really thought I couldn't think any less of you big guy. I stand corrected.
Bush started Iraq, no doubt about it. But Afghanistan? You're really a slug of a human being.
Bush failed to examine or propose other options in Afghanistan
Nation building was not his only option. He could have just invaded and swept out the terrorists
As it is, Bush botched the option that he chose. If we invaded Afghanistan to get at AlQaeda, why did we allow them to escape so easily? Why did we not pursue them into Pakistan? Why did we pull our forces who were supposedly fighting terrorists to invade Iraq ?
Liar. That isn't what you said, I would have agreed with that. What you said was that he started an "unwarranted" war.
So I'm curious. Are you too stupid to remember what the Democrats did to W while he was President and the troops were in Iraq and Afghanistan, or do you just think we are? If it's the latter, you're wrong.
The majority of elected Democrats supported everything Bush did..up until:
A. It was established that Iraq had nothing to do with Al Qaeda..and the Bush administration said it did.
B. It was established that Iraq had no weapons capable of threatening the US homeland or even interests in the region.
C. It was established that Iraq had no nuclear program.
D. It was established that Bush himself had knowingly and falsely represented the Iraq threat in multiple speeches. As well as many of the top officials in the Bush administration.
Yes, Democrats did support him until they decided for pure political purposes they would betray their own country and shirk responsibilities for their own actions for whatever political points they could get from it.
But that once again misses the point, he said that it's tradition to support the President in war. Obama has lied and mislead the country, if that's justification to turn on him, you just supported the right to turn on him.
Then deny they are truthers? Real simple questions really. I mean how many times do we see them blame Bush for starting TWO wars?
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
The military got him because Obama approved the mission to get him. Obama is the CiC. It was his call and he made it. He deserves all of the credit in the world for making that call.
He is cic now. You holding him responsible for the Iraq debacle?
Thought not.
Double talk everyone.
Btw there is more than enough official testimony that water boarding (our own soldiera are water boarded so it is not torture) led to his location.
Why do you think it has taken Obama so long to close Gitmo? This ought to be good.
Then deny they are truthers? Real simple questions really. I mean how many times do we see them blame Bush for starting TWO wars?
I don't understand the question. Is there some disagreement about who was President when we went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Still butthurt that a Democrat got him? Tissue?
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
Really? You never heard anyone say Bush freed Iraq?
Either you're lying or you live in a cave with wifi....which means you're the first option
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
Really? You never heard anyone say Bush freed Iraq?
Either you're lying or you live in a cave with wifi....which means you're the first option
Bush fucking took a trophy from Hussien.
He got his pistol.
Amazing..how much they forget.
Additionally, they were showing degrading photos of Saddam in his underwear all over the news.
The Bush administration also had a habit of releasing gruesome pictures of dead terrorists as well as Saddam's sons after they were killed.
So I'm curious. Are you too stupid to remember what the Democrats did to W while he was President and the troops were in Iraq and Afghanistan, or do you just think we are? If it's the latter, you're wrong.
The majority of elected Democrats supported everything Bush did..up until:
A. It was established that Iraq had nothing to do with Al Qaeda..and the Bush administration said it did.
B. It was established that Iraq had no weapons capable of threatening the US homeland or even interests in the region.
C. It was established that Iraq had no nuclear program.
D. It was established that Bush himself had knowingly and falsely represented the Iraq threat in multiple speeches. As well as many of the top officials in the Bush administration.
Yes, Democrats did support him until they decided for pure political purposes they would betray their own country and shirk responsibilities for their own actions for whatever political points they could get from it.
But that once again misses the point, he said that it's tradition to support the President in war. Obama has lied and mislead the country, if that's justification to turn on him, you just supported the right to turn on him.
Then deny they are truthers? Real simple questions really. I mean how many times do we see them blame Bush for starting TWO wars?
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
The military got him because Obama approved the mission to get him. Obama is the CiC. It was his call and he made it. He deserves all of the credit in the world for making that call.
Yes, he OK'd it, but that isn't personally getting him. The military did that. They found him, they got him. He just said OK, get him.
Sorry I made you cry, man. Man up, here's a hanky. I'm not a Republican, dumb ass. I would say the same to anyone giving credit to a politician.
I haven't heard Republican say W got Hussein, even in reply to your two year old Democratic credit whoring.
Really? You never heard anyone say Bush freed Iraq?
Either you're lying or you live in a cave with wifi....which means you're the first option
Bush fucking took a trophy from Hussien.
He got his pistol.
Amazing..how much they forget.
Additionally, they were showing degrading photos of Saddam in his underwear all over the news.
The Bush administration also had a habit of releasing gruesome pictures of dead terrorists as well as Saddam's sons after they were killed.