Peach
Gold Member
- Jan 10, 2009
- 20,864
- 2,729
- 245
I have no idea the dog owners didnt just let her walk out of the restaraunt without confronting her. My guess is that they assumed they could do so with no consequences. Again thats just a guess on my part.Because that wasnt the issue. The issue was she thought the dog was nasty and got up to leave. The wife of the dog owner got offended and proceeded to confront her in order explain the law to her. Her knowledge of the law was irrelevant. She didnt like the dog near her. I used this analogy. It would be like confronting someone that decided to leave a gay bar once he found it that it was predominately gay. The law is not the issue.I have no issue with animals unless they are not trained or have some disease/fleas etc. However, it would have been a little rougher on the people if they insisted on convincing me that my opinion was not correct. Thats what the Black woman was mad about.I got the same impression...the article, like most mainstream media, was written in a biased manner to manipulate the readers response. I'm a veteran, and I totally agree with this woman. When I think "service dog", what i expect is a dog trained to perform a task, like a see & eye dog, or a dog that pulls a wheelchair and retrieves dropped items. "Emotional support" dogs are pets. Pets don't go to the grocery store, or the restaurant, or the mall.
Then I understand her anger better, thank you. Why not explain to the woman the man is mentally ill, needs the dog, though how he can stand a restaurant even WITH the dog remains a question.
Why wasn't she allowed to leave? And are you the so called "black supremacist"?
I didnt get what you mean by the last question?
ImpureTRASH called you one, I see -0- that indicates the woman in the video is, though Trash says that about her also.