- Mar 11, 2015
- 83,665
- 50,531
- 2,645
View attachment 173490
But seriously, folks:
After reviewing many studies on the topic, Dr. Lilienfeld argues in his paper “Microaggressions: Strong Claims, Inadequate Evidence” that microaggressions lack scientific proof, and therefore should not be included in workplace or campus diversity training.
Moreover, he said he believes that the term microaggression is misleading, as it implies conscious intent to harm, and thus should be abandoned.....
“Because they are totally in the eye of the beholder — anything you say could be labeled as a microaggression,” Lilienfeld said. “In the current literature, if someone is offended by something, it is a microaggression. You simply cannot progress scientifically in this way or expect to resolve racial tensions on a college campus.”
Moreover, Lilienfeld argues that research on microaggressions does not draw upon key domains of psychological science, including: psychometrics, social cognition, cognitive-behavioral therapy, behavior genetics, and personality, health and industrial-organizational psychology.
Ultimately, he recommends entirely eliminating the term microaggression from use....
BINGO!
Scott Lilenfeld
Of course microaggressions lack proof according to a white person until anything they imagine is a microaggression are done to whites, Then we have all the scientific proof on earth that it's real. Just like reverse racism for example. There is no evidence of that but sure as hell whites state this likes it's the gospel.