Racist Black Judge Railroading Amber Guyger

[Grumblenuts]

I mean, damn, if a cute little cop can't get away with it what are my chances?!

 

[Jitss617]

This verdict clearly comes as a shock to those thinking they should be allowed to just shoot black people and get away with it by claiming "Oops!"

How did she know he was black it was dark inside the house.. why do you fabricate what happened ?

 

[rightwinger]

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

 

[Grumblenuts]

How did she know he was black

Are you speculating that she didn't know? Here's an idea, try sticking to the known facts! The guy was black. We know that.

 

[rightwinger]

I don’t think I read one comment here from a Democrat that has not fabricated what really happened in the story.
Why can’t you and Adam shit stop making up stories?
Win the argument with facts if not shut up

What is to make up?

A jury of her peers found her guilty of murder

Didn’t the judge mess with the jury?

No, she refused to declare a mistrial

So it was a mistrial? Huh

No, it wasn’t

The judge sequestered the jury instead of declaring a mistrial

 

[Jitss617]

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

You were in the house?

 

[Grumblenuts]

This verdict clearly comes as a shock to those thinking they should be allowed to just shoot black people and get away with it by claiming "Oops!"

How did she know he was black it was dark inside the house.. why do you fabricate what happened ?

Not a "house." Not a "mistrial.".. why do you fabricate what happened ?

 

[Jitss617]

How did she know he was black

Are you speculating that she didn't know? Here's an idea, try sticking to the known facts! The guy was black. We know that.

At the time of the shooting why did race matter, to her she was in her house, someone was In it. Do you know what his actions were?

 

[Jitss617]

This verdict clearly comes as a shock to those thinking they should be allowed to just shoot black people and get away with it by claiming "Oops!"

How did she know he was black it was dark inside the house.. why do you fabricate what happened ?

Not a "house." Not a "mistrial.".. why do you fabricate what happened ?

Re read the context .. you can do it

 

[Grumblenuts]

Why?

 

[Jitss617]

I don’t think I read one comment here from a Democrat that has not fabricated what really happened in the story.
Why can’t you and Adam shit stop making up stories?
Win the argument with facts if not shut up

What is to make up?

A jury of her peers found her guilty of murder

Didn’t the judge mess with the jury?

No, she refused to declare a mistrial

So it was a mistrial? Huh

No, it wasn’t

The judge sequestered the jury instead of declaring a mistrial

What does sequestering the jury and mistrial have to do with each other?

 

[Jitss617]

This verdict clearly comes as a shock to those thinking they should be allowed to just shoot black people and get away with it by claiming "Oops!"

How did she know he was black it was dark inside the house.. why do you fabricate what happened ?

Not a "house." Not a "mistrial.".. why do you fabricate what happened ?

If you can’t answer the question it’s means you are wrong... why do you want her in jail if it was a mistake?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Thanks for proving my point!

 

[Camp]

This reminds me of how cop defenders tried to defend those two monster cops who blasted away at the little boy restrained in his car seat. They had to use multiple bullets on the toddler. Fortunately, they were sent away on long prison terms.

 

[Jitss617]

Why?

Because you’re fabricating the main facts of this Incident
She went in the wrong apartment by accident. NOT intentionally. FACT

FACT she thought she was in her apartment with an intruder,

Not sure what you would have done if you had a gun and someone was verbally aggressive in the dark

 

[Jitss617]

Thanks for proving my point!

Lol you can’t stick to the facts. She didn’t have time to turn on the lights never mind recognize her apartment or not...
why do you hate so much?

 

[Camp]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

 

[pknopp]

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

 

[Jitss617]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

She didn’t even have time to turn the lights on. Was this shooting racially motivated yes or no ?

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances? It was a mistake it should be manslaughter.. this will be appealed because of the racist judges actions, she will be released

 

[Grumblenuts]

Good name. You truly are a jitbag.
A lying sack of shit as well.