Racist Black Judge Railroading Amber Guyger

[pknopp]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

She didn’t even have time to turn the lights on. Was this shooting racially motivated yes or no ?

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances? It was a mistake it should be manslaughter.. this will be appealed because of the racist judges actions, she will be released

Her training was to retreat and deescalate the situation. She said she didn't remember that training.

 

[Jitss617]

Good name. You truly are a jitbag.
A lying sack of shit as well.

She’s going to be freed soon this judge showed opened bias. Deal with it

 

[Grumblenuts]

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances?

I mean, damn skippy, if a cute little cop can't get away with it what are my chances?!

 

[Camp]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

She didn’t even have time to turn the lights on. Was this shooting racially motivated yes or no ?

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances? It was a mistake it should be manslaughter.. this will be appealed because of the racist judges actions, she will be released

She didn't turn on the lights because she knew immediately upon entering the apartment someone was in the apartment. Guyger, at that point, decided to use deadly force instead of following the official department policy of backing off and calling in a request for back up.

 

[Jitss617]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

She didn’t even have time to turn the lights on. Was this shooting racially motivated yes or no ?

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances? It was a mistake it should be manslaughter.. this will be appealed because of the racist judges actions, she will be released

Her training was to retreat and deescalate the situation. She said she didn't remember that training.

She didn’t have time to turn on the lights lol she did deescalate, the aggressor s dead, it was a mistake.

Why are you fabricating things that didn’t happen ??
It’s ok to say it was a mistake.. you can do it

 

[Jitss617]

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances?

I mean, damn skippy, if a cute little cop can't get away with it what are my chances?!

Huh, all your doing is promoting division in race.. you have had 300 killed in Baltimore alone, you don’t know a name except for this one, which was a mistake.. you are the racist

 

[Grumblenuts]

the aggressor s dead

Who's the racist?

 

[rightwinger]

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

You were in the house?

Neither was the jury

 

[pknopp]

Evidence suggests the victim had an opportunity to throw several scoops of ice cream at the armed police officer which could have blinded her or sullied her uniform.

She didn’t even have time to turn the lights on. Was this shooting racially motivated yes or no ?

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

how was this shooting not justified under the circumstances? It was a mistake it should be manslaughter.. this will be appealed because of the racist judges actions, she will be released

Her training was to retreat and deescalate the situation. She said she didn't remember that training.

She didn’t have time to turn on the lights lol she did deescalate, the aggressor s dead, it was a mistake.

Why are you fabricating things that didn’t happen ??
It’s ok to say it was a mistake.. you can do it

If you are texting and driving and hit and kill someone it's a mistake also but you are going to be held accountable.

We also have to consider that in that case there likely would be a plea bargain accepted. That was not going to happen here because the system was so sure she would never be convicted.

Things are slowly changing.

 

[Jitss617]

the aggressor s dead

Who's the racist?

You are. Why did t she have time to turn on the lights?

 

[rightwinger]

What is to make up?

A jury of her peers found her guilty of murder

Didn’t the judge mess with the jury?

No, she refused to declare a mistrial

So it was a mistrial? Huh

No, it wasn’t

The judge sequestered the jury instead of declaring a mistrial

What does sequestering the jury and mistrial have to do with each other?

You are trolling again

I’m not going to rehash the whole trial for you. Go back and read about the motion for mistrial

 

[Grumblenuts]

Why did t she have time to turn on the lights?

Your assertion, son. Deal with it.

 

[pknopp]

Another accidental shooting but again, the officer was convicted of murder. I imagine we will start to see plea bargains.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...r-fatal-shooting-australian-woman-who-called/

 

[rightwinger]

Guyger could have and should have backed off and called for assistance as soon as she entered the apartment and heard sounds indicating the apartment had someone in it. Even if a criminal was in the apartment and she thought it was her own, there was no immediate threat to her or anyone else. Even her own Department policy called for her to egress and take a defensive position until backup arrived. The murder victim would not have even known she was there if she had followed the official policy.

She did not even ascertain whether he was a criminal. He could have been from apartment maintenance and had a reason to be there

She could have backed off at any time, instead she chose lethal force and must pay a price for it

Why wouldn’t she use deadly force ? She thought she was in her home. Helloooooo mcfly

Deadly force on someone who is not threatening you?
Eating ice cream requires a lethal response?

You carry a gun you need to make responsible decisions. She did not make responsible decisions .....
An innocent man died because of it

This is the issue. We grant police officers the ability to legally kill others. We allow them to legally detain others. With this must come a responsibility to do this in a responsible way.

The idea that the police can kill and never be questioned or held accountable for their actions has to end.

We saw the same thing in Minneapolis with the black officer who shot a white woman who came up to the window of the patrol car.
He was scared, he felt threatened, he was so sorry for his mistake

The jury didn’t buy it there and didn’t buy it in Dallas

You pull the trigger, you assume responsibility for your decision

 

[Jitss617]

Didn’t the judge mess with the jury?

No, she refused to declare a mistrial

So it was a mistrial? Huh

No, it wasn’t

The judge sequestered the jury instead of declaring a mistrial

What does sequestering the jury and mistrial have to do with each other?

You are trolling again

I’m not going to rehash the whole trial for you. Go back and read about the motion for mistrial

It is a mistrial this judge mishandled the procedure .

 

[Grumblenuts]

Apparently had her phone in one hand, bag in the other. Had time to drop one, draw her gun, aim in the dark like a pro, shoot twice, but no time to turn on the lights. Go figure.

 

[Jitss617]

Apparently had her phone in one hand, bag in the other. Had time to drop one, draw her gun, aim in the dark like a pro, shoot twice, but no time to turn on the lights. Go figure.

Yes because of the aggressive environment the black man created

 

[rightwinger]

No, she refused to declare a mistrial

So it was a mistrial? Huh

No, it wasn’t

The judge sequestered the jury instead of declaring a mistrial

What does sequestering the jury and mistrial have to do with each other?

You are trolling again

I’m not going to rehash the whole trial for you. Go back and read about the motion for mistrial

It is a mistrial this judge mishandled the procedure .

Your opinion

 

[rightwinger]

Apparently had her phone in one hand, bag in the other. Had time to drop one, draw her gun, aim in the dark like a pro, shoot twice, but no time to turn on the lights. Go figure.

She is able to kill an innocent black man and text at the same time

 

[Grumblenuts]

Apparently had her phone in one hand, bag in the other. Had time to drop one, draw her gun, aim in the dark like a pro, shoot twice, but no time to turn on the lights. Go figure.

She is able to kill an innocent black man and text at the same time

Why can't we all?