Raising A Society of Fascists

[PoliticalChic]

Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.

At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

 

[PoliticalChic]

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

For clarity.....which are you more of, a liar or a fool?

"Obama taps Kafka: turn in your friends and neighbors: send to [email protected]
Something Stinks in the Land of Oz-bama
From the White House website:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected]."

One wonders how many so-(Pelosi)-called Nazi/ swastikas folks have sent Obama “Fishy” rejoinders about free speech and the problem of lying to your constituents? Budget Neutral my ass, budget neutering more like it! A little TRUTH here please!
Facts Are Stubborn Things The White House
Obama taps Kafka turn in your friends and neighbors send to FLAG whitehouse.gov femisex.com

Seems like a good idea, there is no movement to restrain free speech, people like you and bripat live in the greatest country that exists or ever existed in terms of freedom for all, in terms of First Amendment Rights, I've never suggested you should be censored, no matter how weird you are.

In our culture and within our laws obsessive narcissists like you are welcome to broadcast your beliefs, no matter how paranoid they may seem to those of us capable of critical thought, and not in need of some form of psychological or psychiatric aid. You and bripat are not a threat to yourself or others, so I encourage you to continue on your quest to assassinate the character of everyone who fails to bow before you.

Why wouldn't the current administration seek to clarify and or refute those who oppose their policies? Really, those who profited from the prior system of health care (the Plutocrats most) and their water carriers like you scream that health care reform is Socialism, stirring hate and fear in the masses (well, only those masses Pres. Lincoln called out, "you can fool some of the people all of the time", you know, your fan base,

"Seems like a good idea, there is no movement to restrain free speech,..."

Oh....what an original way of answering the question of whether you are more a liar or a fool.

You're a liar.

Be aware, that niche is kinda full with others of your ilk.


So...you want to deny that reporting what you say to the commissar puts a chill on free speech?



Wait....you may be a fool, too.

 

[Liminal]

Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.

At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

 

[PoliticalChic]

At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

Feel free to think for yourself.

Ooops.
Too late for that.


Too gutless to answer post #165.


Here....let's rub it in:

"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010

 

[Dot Com]

At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah PoliticalSpice and don't source the Right's fav *cough* "historian" (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

 

[Liminal]

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

Feel free to think for yourself.

Ooops.
Too late for that.


Too gutless to answer post #165.


Here....let's rub it in:

"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010

I could use logic like yours to demonstrate that Republicans are monarchists, but that would be silly too.

 

[Wry Catcher]

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

You and you ilk were a fringe element of society only about 30 years ago.

30 years ago? In 1985 I was a supervisor in a county LE Agency, Married, the father of two sons, I was coaching Little League Baseball, and CYO Basketball, I served on one committee at the boys school; we had a cat, a 3 + 2 home on a court with a basketball hoop and my wife had a van and I had an old Ford PU. Fringe, I think not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah Politicalspice and not the Rights fav historian (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

This is actually an excellent post for this thread.

I know you're aren't smart enough to know what you've done....so let me explain it to you. Take notes.


You proved that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are fascists......D'Souza was charged because he criticized your lord and master.

Yup.

Just as you've learned to do from the fascist elites, the Obama administration works tirelessly to marginalize and silence critics.


The proof? Leftists don't get charged for the same things critics do.


"Supporters of D’Souza see a double standard, maintaining Eric Holder’s Justice Department typically ignores similar technical violations in contributions to Democratic Party campaigns.

In January, Geraled R. Molen, producer of D’Souza’s two films, told WND the charges were “the equivalent of prosecuting a political dissident in the Soviet Union for jaywalking.”
Obama nemesis Dinesh D Souza learns punishment

 

[PoliticalChic]

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

Feel free to think for yourself.

Ooops.
Too late for that.


Too gutless to answer post #165.


Here....let's rub it in:

"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010

I could use logic like yours to demonstrate that Republicans are monarchists, but that would be silly too.

That post fits like the kid who came to the sand-lot football game wearing white pants.

 

[Liminal]

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah PoliticalSpice and don't source the Right's fav *cough* "historian" (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

D'Souza, another weirdo with bizarre, completely unsubstantiated theories.

 

[PoliticalChic]

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

You and you ilk were a fringe element of society only about 30 years ago.

30 years ago? In 1985 I was a supervisor in a county LE Agency, Married, the father of two sons, I was coaching Little League Baseball, and CYO Basketball, I served on one committee at the boys school; we had a cat, a 3 + 2 home on a court with a basketball hoop and my wife had a van and I had an old Ford PU. Fringe, I think not.

You should have those last three words monogrammed on all of your wardrobe.

 

[Liminal]

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

Feel free to think for yourself.

Ooops.
Too late for that.


Too gutless to answer post #165.


Here....let's rub it in:

"Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right."
WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010

I could use logic like yours to demonstrate that Republicans are monarchists, but that would be silly too.

That post fits like the kid who came to the sand-lot football game wearing white pants.

I could use your logic to show beyond any doubt that the ocean is not wet.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

For clarity.....which are you more of, a liar or a fool?

"Obama taps Kafka: turn in your friends and neighbors: send to [email protected]
Something Stinks in the Land of Oz-bama
From the White House website:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected]."

One wonders how many so-(Pelosi)-called Nazi/ swastikas folks have sent Obama “Fishy” rejoinders about free speech and the problem of lying to your constituents? Budget Neutral my ass, budget neutering more like it! A little TRUTH here please!
Facts Are Stubborn Things The White House
Obama taps Kafka turn in your friends and neighbors send to FLAG whitehouse.gov femisex.com

Seems like a good idea, there is no movement to restrain free speech, people like you and bripat live in the greatest country that exists or ever existed in terms of freedom for all, in terms of First Amendment Rights, I've never suggested you should be censored, no matter how weird you are.

In our culture and within our laws obsessive narcissists like you are welcome to broadcast your beliefs, no matter how paranoid they may seem to those of us capable of critical thought, and not in need of some form of psychological or psychiatric aid. You and bripat are not a threat to yourself or others, so I encourage you to continue on your quest to assassinate the character of everyone who fails to bow before you.

Why wouldn't the current administration seek to clarify and or refute those who oppose their policies? Really, those who profited from the prior system of health care (the Plutocrats most) and their water carriers like you scream that health care reform is Socialism, stirring hate and fear in the masses (well, only those masses Pres. Lincoln called out, "you can fool some of the people all of the time", you know, your fan base,

"Seems like a good idea, there is no movement to restrain free speech,..."

Oh....what an original way of answering the question of whether you are more a liar or a fool.

You're a liar.

Be aware, that niche is kinda full with others of your ilk.


So...you want to deny that reporting what you say to the commissar puts a chill on free speech?



Wait....you may be a fool, too.

Your spin won't turn. But let's return to a post of mine above, wherein I characterized your shtick as thus: Troll, ad hominem, cut and run.

Isn't it time for the closing act, or do you want to continue to entertain us?

 

[bripat9643]

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

You and you ilk were a fringe element of society only about 30 years ago.

30 years ago? In 1985 I was a supervisor in a county LE Agency, Married, the father of two sons, I was coaching Little League Baseball, and CYO Basketball, I served on one committee at the boys school; we had a cat, a 3 + 2 home on a court with a basketball hoop and my wife had a van and I had an old Ford PU. Fringe, I think not.

How does any of that make you "not a fringe?"

 

[Dot Com]

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah PoliticalSpice and don't source the Right's fav *cough* "historian" (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

D'Souza, another weirdo with bizarre, completely unsubstantiated theories.

A hero of the OP, no doubt. He's basically a hack rw attack dog like gingrich used to be.

 

[Dot Com]

Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah Politicalspice and not the Rights fav historian (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

This is actually an excellent post for this thread.

I know you're aren't smart enough to know what you've done....so let me explain it to you. Take notes.


You proved that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are fascists......D'Souza was charged because he criticized your lord and master.

Yup.

Just as you've learned to do from the fascist elites, the Obama administration works tirelessly to marginalize and silence critics.


The proof? Leftists don't get charged for the same things critics do.


"Supporters of D’Souza see a double standard, maintaining Eric Holder’s Justice Department typically ignores similar technical violations in contributions to Democratic Party campaigns.

In January, Geraled R. Molen, producer of D’Souza’s two films, told WND the charges were “the equivalent of prosecuting a political dissident in the Soviet Union for jaywalking.”
Obama nemesis Dinesh D Souza learns punishment

WND? WND?

D'Nesh was found guilty of electioneering fraud PoliticalSpice. A very grave offense given this great nation's future depends upon keeping hacks like him, and his illegal practices, out of the political process.

 

[Liminal]

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah PoliticalSpice and don't source the Right's fav *cough* "historian" (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

D'Souza, another weirdo with bizarre, completely unsubstantiated theories.

A hero of the OP, no doubt. He's basically a hack rw attack dog like gingrich used to be.

Colonialism apparently being the burning issue on everyone's minds, which is funny since D'Souza is obviously a product of colonialism.

 

[bripat9643]

Did you cite a historian in post 165?

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah Politicalspice and not the Rights fav historian (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

It's far less grave than Hillary taking millions in donations from foreign countries. It's also less grave than using private email for official business.

This is actually an excellent post for this thread.

I know you're aren't smart enough to know what you've done....so let me explain it to you. Take notes.


You proved that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are fascists......D'Souza was charged because he criticized your lord and master.

Yup.

Just as you've learned to do from the fascist elites, the Obama administration works tirelessly to marginalize and silence critics.


The proof? Leftists don't get charged for the same things critics do.


"Supporters of D’Souza see a double standard, maintaining Eric Holder’s Justice Department typically ignores similar technical violations in contributions to Democratic Party campaigns.

In January, Geraled R. Molen, producer of D’Souza’s two films, told WND the charges were “the equivalent of prosecuting a political dissident in the Soviet Union for jaywalking.”
Obama nemesis Dinesh D Souza learns punishment

WND? WND?

D'Nesh was found guilty of electioneering fraud PoliticalSpice. A very grave offense given this great nation's future depends upon keeping hacks like him, and his illegal practices, out of the political process.

What D'Nesh did is far less serious than using a private email server to conduct official State Department business or receiving donations from foreign countries while serving as Secretary of State. In fact, most people would ever serve a day in jail for what D'Nesh did. Bill and Hillary never did.

 

[Dot Com]

Did you answer the questions.....or is it too early in the day, (in your life) to begin thinking for yourself?

Feel free to cite the historians who concur with your little questionnaire.

yeah PoliticalSpice and don't source the Right's fav *cough* "historian" (D'Souza- he's in prison) lol

D'Souza, another weirdo with bizarre, completely unsubstantiated theories.

A hero of the OP, no doubt. He's basically a hack rw attack dog like gingrich used to be.

Colonialism apparently being the burning issue on everyone's minds, which is funny since D'Souza is obviously a product of colonialism.

pretty ironic eh?

 

[Agit8r]

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

No one has argued for consequence-free speech.

The fact that you tried this bogus response is proof that you recognize that the Oregon case is anti-constitutional.

It's what Liberals do.

Another lesson from the sour-grapes school of constitutional law