Raising A Society of Fascists

a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech :rolleyes: Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?
 
Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.
Many very serious people have characterized Nazis as leftwingers. These people are called economists, as opposed to the boobs who call Nazis rightwingers. Those people are called lying demogogues.

"many serious people"?

Well, most readers of your posts believe you're insane; challenged by reality, a kook of limited intelligence, and ignoramus, a fool, a liar, a parrot and ridiculous.

No, that's only what you and your retarded Komrads believe. Adults don't care what you think.
 
a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech :rolleyes: Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.
 
"Sorry but liberals are not fascist."

True.

But the OP is a liar.

Liberalism is indistinguishable from fascism. True fact.
At least you're consistent at being ignorant and ridiculous.

And speaking of ignorant and ridiculous, the OP and others on the right once again exhibit their ignorance of the law, where free speech applies solely to the relationship between government and those governed, not between or among private persons or private organizations.

That racism is denounced in the context of private society is not to deny racists their 'right' to free speech, nor does it constitute 'fascism.'

A public university is not a private organization, nimrod. Now whose exhibiting ignorance of the law?
 
a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech :rolleyes: Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.




For clarity.....which are you more of, a liar or a fool?

"Obama taps Kafka: turn in your friends and neighbors: send to [email protected]
Something Stinks in the Land of Oz-bama
From the White House website:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected]."

One wonders how many so-(Pelosi)-called Nazi/ swastikas folks have sent Obama “Fishy” rejoinders about free speech and the problem of lying to your constituents? Budget Neutral my ass, budget neutering more like it! A little TRUTH here please!
Facts Are Stubborn Things The White House
Obama taps Kafka turn in your friends and neighbors send to FLAG whitehouse.gov femisex.com
 
"Sorry but liberals are not fascist."

True.

But the OP is a liar.
I don't think its so much that PoliticalSpice is a liar as it is she drank the rw kool aid.



Another post having no relationship to the thread to which you are supposedly responding.....

It translates, as do all of your posts....to "I'm so upset that you reveal the truth....I wish I could dispute any of it!!!!"
 
Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.



At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.
 
Should Liberalsism/Progressivism continue in the ascendancy, American will be fascist, as it was when Progressive Woodrow Wilson was President.


Hyperbole?

Only to a slight degree....'fascism' in America looks different than the long black coated Gestapo of Nazi Germany because it has been altered by the history of America.


" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated [in America] by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

[The loss of liberty....as in free speech.]

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
"Liberal Fascism," Goldberg




Say anything out of sync with the milieu and the fascists of today call it 'fascistic' and claim the right to silence it.


For a limited, but salient, definition of 'fascist,' let's focus on the shutting down and punishing those who say things one doesn't agree with. In America today, fascism is known as 'political correctness',,,,and it is not merely a suggestion.
So saith the Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.






Seems the recent Oklahoma State kerfuffle had drawn a clear line between those who honor the Constitution, specifically the first amendment, and those who honor 'political correctness,' the contemporary fascists.



1. "....University of Oklahoma President David Boren chose to expel two students for singing a vile, racist ditty at a fraternity event. There is nothing funny about lyrics that make light of lynching and chant a racial slur.


2. .... Boren was wrong to act as he did. As UCLA law Professor Eugene Volokh wrote, “racist speech is constitutionally protected, just as is expression of other contemptible ideas; and universities may not discipline students based on their speech.” Courts have consistently ruled to that effect.
A free country doesn’t want the government to educate only people with approved viewpoints..... Boren’s move appears to be wildly popular in academia.'"


a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate



So the latest amendment to the 'living Constitution' of the LIberals is 'never offend.'

thanks
 
Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.



At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.



Did you miss post #165?
 
a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech :rolleyes: Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.

You and you ilk were a fringe element of society only about 30 years ago.
 
"Sorry but liberals are not fascist."

True.

But the OP is a liar.

Liberalism is indistinguishable from fascism. True fact.
At least you're consistent at being ignorant and ridiculous.

And speaking of ignorant and ridiculous, the OP and others on the right once again exhibit their ignorance of the law, where free speech applies solely to the relationship between government and those governed, not between or among private persons or private organizations.

That racism is denounced in the context of private society is not to deny racists their 'right' to free speech, nor does it constitute 'fascism.'

A public university is not a private organization, nimrod. Now whose exhibiting ignorance of the law?

It's almost like House Republicans explaining American law to the government of Iran.

lol
 
Look at this shit, all those posts for nothing. As if anyone actually has a hard time understanding the Nazi philosophy. No serious person would characterize Nazis as anything but right wing reactionaries.



At one time I was amazed at how stupid you Leftist acolytes are...

no longer.

Your capacity for being led is unlimited.


Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:



Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?



And, of course, they all are do.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.

There are no actual historians anywhere who would substantiate your bizarre claims. Not even a little bit.



Did you miss post #165?

Did you cite a historian in post 165?
 
a. "Boren wrote to the two frat boys that he was expelling them because of their “leadership role in leading a racist and exclusionary chant which has created a hostile educational environment for others.”
I pledge allegiance to the First Amendment - SFGate

Free speech is not the same as consequence-free speech :rolleyes: Worthless racists have to follow the same code of conduct as anyone else.

A code of conduct that controls what you can say is a violation of the First Amendment, moron.

You bootlicking fascist libturds just can't stand the First Amendment, can you?

We sure do support the First Amendment, the greatest argument against anarchists and other fringe members of society is to let them speak, thus you must be allowed to speak, write and emote.




For clarity.....which are you more of, a liar or a fool?

"Obama taps Kafka: turn in your friends and neighbors: send to [email protected]
Something Stinks in the Land of Oz-bama
From the White House website:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to [email protected]."

One wonders how many so-(Pelosi)-called Nazi/ swastikas folks have sent Obama “Fishy” rejoinders about free speech and the problem of lying to your constituents? Budget Neutral my ass, budget neutering more like it! A little TRUTH here please!
Facts Are Stubborn Things The White House
Obama taps Kafka turn in your friends and neighbors send to FLAG whitehouse.gov femisex.com

Seems like a good idea, there is no movement to restrain free speech, people like you and bripat live in the greatest country that exists or ever existed in terms of freedom for all, in terms of First Amendment Rights, I've never suggested you should be censored, no matter how weird you are.

In our culture and within our laws obsessive narcissists like you are welcome to broadcast your beliefs, no matter how paranoid they may seem to those of us capable of critical thought, and not in need of some form of psychological or psychiatric aid. You and bripat are not a threat to yourself or others, so I encourage you to continue on your quest to assassinate the character of everyone who fails to bow before you.

Why wouldn't the current administration seek to clarify and or refute those who oppose their policies? Really, those who profited from the prior system of health care (the Plutocrats most) and their water carriers like you scream that health care reform is Socialism, stirring hate and fear in the masses (well, only those masses Pres. Lincoln called out, "you can fool some of the people all of the time", you know, your fan base).
 
Should Liberalsism/Progressivism continue in the ascendancy, American will be fascist, as it was when Progressive Woodrow Wilson was President.


Hyperbole?'

Yes.

Hugely.


Too bad you didn't have the time to read the rest of that.....

Hyperbole?

Only to a slight degree....'fascism' in America looks different than the long black coated Gestapo of Nazi Germany because it has been altered by the history of America.


" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated [in America] by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

[The loss of liberty....as in free speech.]

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
"Liberal Fascism," Goldberg
 

Forum List

Back
Top