BluesLegend
Diamond Member
- Sep 7, 2014
- 77,781
- 55,936
right. it's me that sucks at thinking.this is profoundly moronic.Not if a child attends public school. You have no right morally to put my child at risk.from the OP, here is exactly what he said:
"
When asked by radio host Laura Ingraham Monday about his views on vaccination, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said that while he is not “anti-vaccine” at all, he does think they should be voluntary, later going on to say that vaccines can cause “mental disorders.”
Please note the words "can cause". He did not say "will cause" or "most cause". He said "can" cause.
If your child is vaccinated why would they be at risk? You libs really suck at thinking.
first, vaccines do not offer 100% immunity. they may not be effective in some people, and some people are not able to be vaccinated because of other health reasons or age.
second, sick people breed illnesses. a compromised immune system is susceptible to other diseases, and so while we may be immunized against your primary illness, your secondary disease may infect other people.
third, while treating your unimmunized dumbass for a completely preventable disease resources are consumed that would otherwise be used to treat diseases that aren't completely preventable.
As I said you libs suck at thinking. If the vaccine was not effective in your kid why are they in school posing a risk to others? lol
which do you think is more likely to happen, an outbreak of a disease where 100% of the people were immunized with a 90% effective vaccine or an outbreak where 90% of the people are immunized with the same vaccine?
Apparently you people also suck at math, your question is well stupid. Again this other clown foamed at the mouth that an un-vaccinated kid posed a risk to his vaccinated kid. That would only be true if the vaccine was not effective in his kid, in which case his kid poses the same risk to others as the un-vaccinated kid...right...libs its not rocket science.