Random Truths

[
The fact that Hillary Clinton's alleged law problems and that she is being investigated is proof that the rule of law is operating the way it was designed to operate.

The law is designed to operate with a elite who is not subject to it? Who knew? :dunno:

She is not above the law.

No more than water is wet.

If the rule of law did not apply to her the public would not have an input or be kept informed about the investigation.

The public was informed that she is above the law, too big to jail.

The one that is not adhering to the system is people like you who are willing to prejudge before the system is allowed to follow the legal procedure. It's that thing called innocent before being proved guilty.

The courts are to adjudicate a person innocent until proven guilty.

The public is not the court, and Hillary HAS been proven guilty, your lies notwithstanding.
 
Last edited:
There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

  1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…

So if someone on the left called Donald Trump a Marxist, a Tyrant, a terrorist sympathizer, a foreign born anti-Christ...

...that would be demonization, right?

10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

The progressive income tax applies equally to everyone. The taxable income you earn in each bracket is taxed the same as everyone else who earns money in that bracket.



".... progressive income tax applies equally...."

You have a facility with language....just not the English language.

To progressives, the concept of equality only applies when it involves benefiting. It doesn't when it involves contributing.
 
And numbers 7 & 8


7. Socialism encourages selfishness (e.g, 'entitlements') while capitalism does not.
The only way for a capitalist, an entrepreneur to be successful is to provide service to others, hence its similarity to Judeo-Christian traditions.
If you believe otherwise, amble over to the government's motor vehicle department.


8. Given the choice, people prefer being taken care of over taking care of themselves. The success of Liberalism is based on latching onto this concept.
The flaw in the concept is that government produces nothing, and must take from those who do to provide that which they give away.

This is what Jefferson said of the process:
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
http://www.founding.com/founders_library/pageID.2190/default.asp


Karl Marx fathered the view in force today.
 
Last edited:
And numbers 7 & 8


7. Socialism encourages selfishness (e.g, 'entitlements') while capitalism does not.
The only way for a capitalist, an entrepreneur to be successful is to provide service to others, hence its similarity to Judeo-Christian traditions.
If you believe otherwise, amble over to the government's motor vehicle department.


8. Give the choice, people prefer being taken care of over taking care of themselves. The success of Liberalism is based on latching onto this concept.
The flaw in the concept is that government produces nothing, and must take from those who do to provide that which they give away.

This is what Jefferson said of the process:
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
http://www.founding.com/founders_library/pageID.2190/default.asp


Karl Marx fathered the view in force today.


Good point. That racist pile of crap Andrew Jackson is the Father of the Democratic Party. BUT for today's progressive, it is actually Karl Marx who sets the agenda.
 
And numbers 7 & 8


7. Socialism encourages selfishness (e.g, 'entitlements') while capitalism does not.
The only way for a capitalist, an entrepreneur to be successful is to provide service to others, hence its similarity to Judeo-Christian traditions.
If you believe otherwise, amble over to the government's motor vehicle department.


8. Give the choice, people prefer being taken care of over taking care of themselves. The success of Liberalism is based on latching onto this concept.
The flaw in the concept is that government produces nothing, and must take from those who do to provide that which they give away.

This is what Jefferson said of the process:
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
http://www.founding.com/founders_library/pageID.2190/default.asp


Karl Marx fathered the view in force today.


Good point. That racist pile of crap Andrew Jackson is the Father of the Democratic Party. BUT for today's progressive, it is actually Karl Marx who sets the agenda.


Both sad, and true.

When the aims and endeavors of the modern Democrat Party are shown to be almost identical to that of the CPUSA (Communist Party of the USA), the brain-numbed government school grads shrug, or deny that which is right before their eyes.
 
And, to borrow from Edmond Rostand....

Hark, how the steel rings musical!
Mark how my point floats, light as the foam,
Ready to drive you back to the wall,
Then, as I end the refrain, thrust home!

The last two "Random Truths" of today's episode...



9. The operative term that forms the center of the conservative's worldview is EARN. Affirmative action is the antithesis.
As is socialism.


10. If 'diversity' is an important value, why is it never mentioned in connection with sports?
 
There are so many conservative commentators, and conversations, that have contributed to these truths....you may recognize some of your words, as well.....

  1. The Left survives on demonization of the Right…rather than debating ideas: they teach their drones that the Right is not wrong, but evil…

So if someone on the left called Donald Trump a Marxist, a Tyrant, a terrorist sympathizer, a foreign born anti-Christ...

...that would be demonization, right?

10. If the desire is for a ‘level playing field,’ how to explain progressive income tax?

The progressive income tax applies equally to everyone. The taxable income you earn in each bracket is taxed the same as everyone else who earns money in that bracket.



".... progressive income tax applies equally...."

You have a facility with language....just not the English language.

To progressives, the concept of equality only applies when it involves benefiting. It doesn't when it involves contributing.

You lie.
 
Alas...how time flies.

Here it is....time for another addition of "Random Truths," the sort of statements that, if followed,and/or believed, would lead to a successful, and informed life.

Hard to believe....some 120 gave already been posted....
Today, ten more lessons to live by.




1. It is a lie that men earn 21% more, for the same work, as women do. Equal pay has been the law in America since 1963.
That's a fact.
If you believe otherwise, you are simply one of the mushrooms raised by the Left...and you know how mushrooms are raised.


2. Many of the world's worst terrorists are/were neither poor nor uneducated.The point is clear: neither education nor wealth predict rectitude.....only the correct values do.
i don't know why posters bother with you ... you are so full of shit ... knothing but just plain right wing bull shit
 
Alas...how time flies.

Here it is....time for another addition of "Random Truths," the sort of statements that, if followed,and/or believed, would lead to a successful, and informed life.

Hard to believe....some 120 gave already been posted....
Today, ten more lessons to live by.




1. It is a lie that men earn 21% more, for the same work, as women do. Equal pay has been the law in America since 1963.
That's a fact.
If you believe otherwise, you are simply one of the mushrooms raised by the Left...and you know how mushrooms are raised.


2. Many of the world's worst terrorists are/were neither poor nor uneducated.The point is clear: neither education nor wealth predict rectitude.....only the correct values do.
i don't know why posters bother with you ... you are so full of shit ... knothing but just plain right wing bull shit



So sorry.

My posts where meant for folks with IQs having at least three digits.

Now, scuttle along back to your blanket fort, and continue coloring.
 
Alas...how time flies.

Here it is....time for another addition of "Random Truths," the sort of statements that, if followed,and/or believed, would lead to a successful, and informed life.

Hard to believe....some 120 gave already been posted....
Today, ten more lessons to live by.




1. It is a lie that men earn 21% more, for the same work, as women do. Equal pay has been the law in America since 1963.
That's a fact.
If you believe otherwise, you are simply one of the mushrooms raised by the Left...and you know how mushrooms are raised.


2. Many of the world's worst terrorists are/were neither poor nor uneducated.The point is clear: neither education nor wealth predict rectitude.....only the correct values do.
i don't know why posters bother with you ... you are so full of shit ... knothing but just plain right wing bull shit

I've never seen a person lose more arguments. And take comfort in the fact that underneath the foul mouthed arrogant insult-fest she puts out,

she knows she's losing these arguments.
 
And numbers 7 & 8


7. Socialism encourages selfishness (e.g, 'entitlements') while capitalism does not.
The only way for a capitalist, an entrepreneur to be successful is to provide service to others, hence its similarity to Judeo-Christian traditions.
If you believe otherwise, amble over to the government's motor vehicle department.


8. Given the choice, people prefer being taken care of over taking care of themselves. The success of Liberalism is based on latching onto this concept.
The flaw in the concept is that government produces nothing, and must take from those who do to provide that which they give away.

This is what Jefferson said of the process:
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
http://www.founding.com/founders_library/pageID.2190/default.asp


Karl Marx fathered the view in force today.

Bull$#!t
Apply your random no. 7 to these facts:

EpiPen Price Gouging Came As Mylan Pulled Off Tax Inversion | Fox Business
EpiPen’s 400 percent price hike tells us a lot about what’s wrong with American health care Mylan hikes price after other manufacturer discontinues production = monopoly
EpiPen Prices Rocket Along with Drugmaker Executive's Pay - NBC News

You really Should study the facts instead of contemplating the swill inside your tiny little skull.
 
Last edited:
upload_2016-8-24_8-56-5.png
 
And numbers 7 & 8


7. Socialism encourages selfishness (e.g, 'entitlements') while capitalism does not.
The only way for a capitalist, an entrepreneur to be successful is to provide service to others, hence its similarity to Judeo-Christian traditions.
If you believe otherwise, amble over to the government's motor vehicle department.


8. Given the choice, people prefer being taken care of over taking care of themselves. The success of Liberalism is based on latching onto this concept.
The flaw in the concept is that government produces nothing, and must take from those who do to provide that which they give away.

This is what Jefferson said of the process:
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
http://www.founding.com/founders_library/pageID.2190/default.asp


Karl Marx fathered the view in force today.

Bull$#!t
Apply your random no. 7 to these facts:

EpiPen Price Gouging Came As Mylan Pulled Off Tax Inversion | Fox Business
EpiPen’s 400 percent price hike tells us a lot about what’s wrong with American health care
EpiPen Prices Rocket Along with Drugmaker Executive's Pay - NBC News

You really Should study the facts instead of contemplating the swill inside your tiny little skull.


You're a government school grad, huh?

Perhaps this will erase some of your indoctrination:
The Nordic countries, particularly Sweden, are held up by socialists as their shining examples.

Except that Sweden has turned to capitalism, and eschewed socialism.
Get that?
Socialism has been proven to be a failure.

"The Economist: The Nordic countries are reinventing their model of capitalism, says Adrian Wooldridge
Feb 2nd 2013 |From the print edition

  1. THIRTY YEARS AGO Margaret Thatcher turned Britain into the world’s leading centre of “thinking the unthinkable”. Today that distinction has passed to Sweden….Sweden has reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP from 67% in 1993 to 49% today…. It has also cut the top marginal tax rate by 27 percentage points since 1983, to 57%, and scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance. This year it is cutting the corporate-tax rate from 26.3% to 22%.
  2. Sweden has also donned the golden straitjacket of fiscal orthodoxy with its pledge to produce a fiscal surplus over the economic cycle. Its public debt fell from 70% of GDP in 1993 to 37% in 2010, and its budget moved from an 11% deficit to a surplus of 0.3% over the same period.
  3. Most daringly, it has introduced a universal system of school vouchers and invited private schools to compete with public ones. Private companies also vie with each other to provide state-funded health services and care for the elderly….Sweden is pioneering “a new conservative model”…
  4. …Sweden’s quiet revolution has brought about a dramatic change in its economic performance. The two decades from 1970 were a period of decline: the country was demoted from being the world’s fourth-richest in 1970 to 14th-richest in 1993, …The two decades from 1990 were a period of recovery: GDP growth between 1993 and 2010 averaged 2.7% a year and productivity 2.1% a year, compared with 1.9% and 1% respectively for the main 15 EU countries.
  5. For most of the 20th century ....the government kept growing: public spending as a share of GDP nearly doubled from 1960 to 1980 and peaked at 67% in 1993.
    1. Taxes kept rising. The Social Democrats (who ruled Sweden for 44 uninterrupted years from 1932 to 1976 and for 21 out of the 24 years from 1982 to 2006) kept squeezing business. “The era of neo-capitalism is drawing to an end,” said Olof Palme, the party’s leader, in 1974. “It is some kind of socialism that is the key to the future.
  6. The other Nordic countries have been moving in the same direction,… Denmark has one of the most liberal labour markets in Europe. It also allows parents to send children to private schools at public expense and make up the difference in cost with their own money. Finland is harnessing the skills of venture capitalists and angel investors to promote innovation and entrepreneurship.
  7. But the new Nordic model begins with the individual rather than the state. It begins with fiscal responsibility rather than pump-priming: all four Nordic countries have AAA ratings and debt loads significantly below the euro-zone average. It begins with choice and competition rather than paternalism and planning.
    1. The leftward lurch has been reversed: rather than extending the state into the market, the Nordics are extending the market into the state.
  8. “The welfare state we have is excellent in most ways,” says Gunnar Viby Mogensen, a Danish historian. “We only have this little problem. We can’t afford it.”
  9. ….they have reached the future first. They are grappling with problems that other countries too will have to deal with in due course, such as what to do when you reach the limits of big government and how to organise society when almost all women work.
  10. … the new Nordic model is proving strikingly successful. The Nordics dominate indices of competitiveness as well as of well-being. Their high scores in both types of league table mark a big change since the 1980s when welfare took precedence over competitiveness.”
http://www.economist.com/news/speci...einventing-their-model-capitalism-says-adrian



Again, you dunce?

a. reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP
b. cut the top marginal tax rate
c. scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance.
d. cutting the corporate-tax rate
e. pledge to produce a fiscal surplus
f. public debt fell from 70% of GDP in 1993 to 37% in 2010
g. budget moved from an 11% deficit to a surplus of 0.3%
h. a universal system of school vouchers
i. invited private schools to compete with public ones.
j. Private companies also vie with each other to provide state-funded health services and care for the elderly



the new Nordic model begins with the individual rather than the state.
Sweden is pioneering “a new conservative model”…


Memorize these two rules:
Rule #1: PoliticalChic is never wrong.
Rule #2 See rule #1.
 
PeeCee,

1. When you are made to look the silly fool you are, why do you always ask "You're a government school grad.."?
2. Instead of dithering on for eight paragraphs about northern Europe, why don't you simply apply YOUR no. 7 "random truth" to the problem Americans have with the EpiPen FACTS?
3. "..PoliticlChic is never wrong." “Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it.” Voltaire
 
I wonder if PC is anti-abortion? How does that side with the fact that the EpiPen is now out of the affordability range for millions of people whose children's lives depend on it?

So like most right wing fringe crackheads, they will throw their lives down and be arrested to protect an embryo, but it's OK for children to die now that their parents can not pay the 400% increase in price, which our government allows in the name of capitalism.

PC needs to go away quietly and let her hypocrisy eat her alive in private.
 
Oh, and one more thing: Quality of life amongst the top industrialized countries:

Canada, Sweden and Denmark come in as the three top countries for quality of life. All evil, terrible socialist regimes.
U.S. comes in at 14th.

The 60 Best Countries for Quality of Life

You see, you silly old girl, one doesn't need to copy and paste reams of "random truths" when facts and data can be fairly short and sweet.
 
PeeCee,

1. When you are made to look the silly fool you are, why do you always ask "You're a government school grad.."?
2. Instead of dithering on for eight paragraphs about northern Europe, why don't you simply apply YOUR no. 7 "random truth" to the problem Americans have with the EpiPen FACTS?
3. "..PoliticlChic is never wrong." “Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it.” Voltaire



"why do you always ask "You're a government school grad.."?

Because an answer in the affirmative explains the indoctrination.


".PoliticlChic is never wrong." “Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it.” Voltaire

As you were unable to dispute my post re: socialism is admitted failure, your Voltaire quote certainly doesn't apply.

But...you have helped verify rules 1 and 2:
Rule #1: PoliticalChic is never wrong.
Rule #2 See rule #1.
 
I wonder if PC is anti-abortion? How does that side with the fact that the EpiPen is now out of the affordability range for millions of people whose children's lives depend on it?

So like most right wing fringe crackheads, they will throw their lives down and be arrested to protect an embryo, but it's OK for children to die now that their parents can not pay the 400% increase in price, which our government allows in the name of capitalism.

PC needs to go away quietly and let her hypocrisy eat her alive in private.


1. "I wonder if PC is anti-abortion?"

Wonder no more: I oppose killing innocent human beings.

And you?


2. "How does that side with the fact that the EpiPen is now out of the affordability range for millions of people whose children's lives depend on it?"
You worry about children???

Really?

Did you know that the greatest cause of death to children is auto accidents...and Barack Obama advanced a program that will result in more deaths of children?

1. "What would you say, though, if I told you that this “good thing” that the government is forcing on us in the name of “saving the environment” is responsible for no less than 2,000 deaths per year?

Back in 2002, the National Academy of Sciences did a study on the effects of CAFE. They found that over the three decades CAFE has been in effect, downsizing of cars and trucks for fuel economy has cost us about 2,000 lives per year.

Less steel framing and smaller size equals more miles per gallon. It also means you’re rolling down the road in a vehicle with much less crashworthiness, making you more vulnerable to every stationary object, to that semi behind you … and to the guy in the normal-sized car.

This death toll figure was arrived at long before President Obama recently upped the CAFE standards by 30% and more. The death toll going forward will be even higher."
"Pajamas Media » The Hidden Death Toll of Higher CAFE Standards

The Hidden Death Toll of Higher CAFE Standards


Isn't this fun...you tossing out fabrications and myths, and me shredding 'em?


Keep on!!!
 
Oh, and one more thing: Quality of life amongst the top industrialized countries:

Canada, Sweden and Denmark come in as the three top countries for quality of life. All evil, terrible socialist regimes.
U.S. comes in at 14th.

The 60 Best Countries for Quality of Life

You see, you silly old girl, one doesn't need to copy and paste reams of "random truths" when facts and data can be fairly short and sweet.


"Canada, Sweden and Denmark come in as the three top countries for quality of life. All evil, terrible socialist regimes.
U.S. comes in at 14th.


1. You don't learn quickly, do you.
I just proved that the Nordics have tossed out socialism.
Again?

The Economist: The Nordic countries are reinventing their model of capitalism, says Adrian Wooldridge
Feb 2nd 2013 |From the print edition

  1. THIRTY YEARS AGO Margaret Thatcher turned Britain into the world’s leading centre of “thinking the unthinkable”. Today that distinction has passed to Sweden….Sweden has reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP from 67% in 1993 to 49% today…. It has also cut the top marginal tax rate by 27 percentage points since 1983, to 57%, and scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance. This year it is cutting the corporate-tax rate from 26.3% to 22%.
  2. Sweden has also donned the golden straitjacket of fiscal orthodoxy with its pledge to produce a fiscal surplus over the economic cycle. Its public debt fell from 70% of GDP in 1993 to 37% in 2010, and its budget moved from an 11% deficit to a surplus of 0.3% over the same period.
  3. Most daringly, it has introduced a universal system of school vouchers and invited private schools to compete with public ones. Private companies also vie with each other to provide state-funded health services and care for the elderly….Sweden is pioneering “a new conservative model”…
  4. …Sweden’s quiet revolution has brought about a dramatic change in its economic performance. The two decades from 1970 were a period of decline: the country was demoted from being the world’s fourth-richest in 1970 to 14th-richest in 1993, …The two decades from 1990 were a period of recovery: GDP growth between 1993 and 2010 averaged 2.7% a year and productivity 2.1% a year, compared with 1.9% and 1% respectively for the main 15 EU countries.
  5. For most of the 20th century Sweden prided itself on offering what Marquis Childs called, in his 1936 book of that title, a “Middle Way” between capitalism and socialism…As the decades rolled by, the middle way veered left. The government kept growing: public spending as a share of GDP nearly doubled from 1960 to 1980 and peaked at 67% in 1993.
    1. Taxes kept rising. The Social Democrats (who ruled Sweden for 44 uninterrupted years from 1932 to 1976 and for 21 out of the 24 years from 1982 to 2006) kept squeezing business. “The era of neo-capitalism is drawing to an end,” said Olof Palme, the party’s leader, in 1974. “It is some kind of socialism that is the key to the future.”
  6. The other Nordic countries have been moving in the same direction,… Denmark has one of the most liberal labour markets in Europe. It also allows parents to send children to private schools at public expense and make up the difference in cost with their own money. Finland is harnessing the skills of venture capitalists and angel investors to promote innovation and entrepreneurship.
  7. But the new Nordic model begins with the individual rather than the state. It begins with fiscal responsibility rather than pump-priming: all four Nordic countries have AAA ratings and debt loads significantly below the euro-zone average. It begins with choice and competition rather than paternalism and planning.
    1. The leftward lurch has been reversed: rather than extending the state into the market, the Nordics are extending the market into the state.
  8. “The welfare state we have is excellent in most ways,” says Gunnar Viby Mogensen, a Danish historian. “We only have this little problem. We can’t afford it.”
  9. ….they have reached the future first. They are grappling with problems that other countries too will have to deal with in due course, such as what to do when you reach the limits of big government and how to organise society when almost all women work.
  10. … the new Nordic model is proving strikingly successful. The Nordics dominate indices of competitiveness as well as of well-being. Their high scores in both types of league table mark a big change since the 1980s when welfare took precedence over competitiveness.”
http://www.economist.com/news/speci...einventing-their-model-capitalism-says-adrian



a. reduced public spending as a proportion of GDP
b. cut the top marginal tax rate
c. scrapped a mare’s nest of taxes on property, gifts, wealth and inheritance.
d. cutting the corporate-tax rate
e. pledge to produce a fiscal surplus
f. public debt fell from 70% of GDP in 1993 to 37% in 2010
g. budget moved from an 11% deficit to a surplus of 0.3%
h. a universal system of school vouchers
i. invited private schools to compete with public ones.
j. Private companies also vie with each other to provide state-funded health services and care for the elderly


the new Nordic model begins with the individual rather than the state.
Sweden is pioneering “a new conservative model”…



You better take notes this time.


2."Canada, Sweden and Denmark come in as the three top countries for quality of life. All evil, terrible socialist regimes.
U.S. comes in at 14th."

Really?

Let's see if you actually believe that:


IF the US is 14th on the list.....when are you moving?
Drop a card when you get settled in.
 

Forum List

Back
Top