Rats are jumping off SS Trump: Donald Trump Has a Big Problem in the Senate ... Lindsey Graham sinks

[rightwinger]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

Republicans

Let’s have a vote to see if we should have a vote

 

[Denizen]

Scumbag. Lying OP Just can't help himself with all his fake news!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that all but three GOP senators had signed onto his resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry.

GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have not yet signed onto the resolution, according to an updated list of co-sponsors shared by Graham the day after he introduced the measure.

A spokesperson for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether or not she would back the resolution, which formally opposes the impeachment inquiry and urges House Democrats to hold an official vote on it.

A spokeswoman for Romney noted that he said on Thursday that he would look at the resolution.

"I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to decide whether there is support for impeachment. I’d love to see a more open process," Romney said.

Murkowski also told reporters on Thursday that she hadn't yet read the resolution.

The resolution also says the House should give President Trump "due process" including "the ability to confront his accusers" and that House Republicans should be able to subpoena their own witnesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

Lindsay Graham is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved.

The OP is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved!!!!!

Your confession is noted.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

Republicans

Let’s have a vote to see if we should have a vote

/——-/ Without a vote, this inquiry is just a clown show. That’s why you like it.

 

[Camp]

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

Republicans

Let’s have a vote to see if we should have a vote

/——-/ Without a vote, this inquiry is just a clown show. That’s why you like it.

A hell of a lot of serious evidence for impeachment is coming out of what you echo Trump's talking phrase "clown show".

 

[Cellblock2429]

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

Republicans

Let’s have a vote to see if we should have a vote

/——-/ Without a vote, this inquiry is just a clown show. That’s why you like it.

A hell of a lot of serious evidence for impeachment is coming out of what you echo Trump's talking phrase "clown show".

/—-/ Yeah. Lots of second hand testimony with no evidence to back it up. If Adam Shytface had anything solid, he’d have leaked it already and Piglosi would be banging the gavel for an impeachment vote.

 

[The Purge]

Scumbag. Lying OP Just can't help himself with all his fake news!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that all but three GOP senators had signed onto his resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry.

GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have not yet signed onto the resolution, according to an updated list of co-sponsors shared by Graham the day after he introduced the measure.

A spokesperson for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether or not she would back the resolution, which formally opposes the impeachment inquiry and urges House Democrats to hold an official vote on it.

A spokeswoman for Romney noted that he said on Thursday that he would look at the resolution.

"I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to decide whether there is support for impeachment. I’d love to see a more open process," Romney said.

Murkowski also told reporters on Thursday that she hadn't yet read the resolution.

The resolution also says the House should give President Trump "due process" including "the ability to confront his accusers" and that House Republicans should be able to subpoena their own witnesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

Lindsay Graham is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved.

The OP is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved!!!!!

Your confession is noted.

As is you anti-American propaganda!

 

[Billy_Bob]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

So you throw out 245 years of Jurist prudence for your fantasy to become legitimate.. The ends justify the means, any means that will net you what you want...

Fuck you communist pieces of shit!

 

[The Purge]

Trump says they are all liars, losers and low life’s.

We can only trust what Trump tells us

Nailed you!

 

[Billy_Bob]

/----/ So when were the Articles of Impeachment voted on and passed?
Key Takeaways: Impeachment Process

• The process of impeachment is established by the U.S. Constitution.
• The impeachment process must be initiated in the House of Representatives with the passage of a resolution listing the charges or “Articles of Impeachment” against the official being impeached.
• If passed by the House, the Articles of Impeachment are considered by the Senate in a trial presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, with the 100 Senators serving as the jury.
• If the Senate votes in favor of conviction by a 2/3 supermajority vote (67 votes), the Senate will then vote to remove the official from office.
• The Method and History of the US Impeachment Process

Yeah, right.
As though gathering evidence to construct the Articles of Impeachment is not part of the process.

Tell me retard, what due process was Clinton given? Do you know?

1. Clinton or his attorney was given:
* The right to question/cross examine witnesses
* The right to be present during all depositions
* The right to all transcripts, evidence, and information obtained
* The right to call witnesses

2. Clinton was given these due process rights during the house investigation.
3. Clinton was given open hearings in the Judiciary committee as afforded by HOR rules.
4. Clinton was afforded a roll call VOTE IN THE HOUSE to fund and proceed with the investigation..

These are all the things you are DENYING TRUMP!

ALL preceding investigations for impeachment were under these rules but somehow, today, Trump is not allowed these basic due process rights. Tell me when he lost his rights? What legal preceding took them?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

Republicans

Let’s have a vote to see if we should have a vote

Without a vote to begin there is no impeachment proceeding... And the one in July killed this process dead..

 

[Camp]

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

So you throw out 245 years of Jurist prudence for your fantasy to become legitimate.. The ends justify the means, any means that will net you what you want...

Fuck you communist pieces of shit!

No, you lying weasel. You edited my post to exclude my comment about an impeachment inquiry to make it appear I was agreeing with your comment about a vote not being needed for an actual impeachment. What kind of shallow little weak man dishonors himself like that over random postings on a message board? What a sad life you must have to publicly dishonor yourself over such a small irrelevant matter.

 

[Billy_Bob]

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?

So you throw out 245 years of Jurist prudence for your fantasy to become legitimate.. The ends justify the means, any means that will net you what you want...

Fuck you communist pieces of shit!

No, you lying weasel. You edited my post to exclude my comment about an impeachment inquiry to make it appear I was agreeing with your comment about a vote not being needed for an actual impeachment. What kind of shallow little weak man dishonors himself like that over random postings on a message board? What a sad life you must have to publicly dishonor yourself over such a small irrelevant matter.

Your post was untouched... those are YOUR comments.. quit lying!