Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What so you look down upon those who would rather deal with an real snake than an RINO snake in the grass that makes grifty deals (like Collins and Murkowski) for their votes?......After they are done with their "demands" you might get 15% of what you want even if the gop gets the leadership back and the taxpayer is always poorer for it.....No thanks.He's literally the only Republican who is capable of winning that seat. This is the problem with you guys. You'd rather have a Democrat who will give you nothing as opposed to a Republicans in a heavily blue state will give you 50 to 60% of what you want and this is why you lose over and over again and rarely see your agenda passed.
There isn’t a person in the world who is aware of the news who doesn’t see this as a political lynching.Just before the verdict in Donald Trump's hush-money trial came out, Larry Hogan released a statement defending the U.S. legal system and urging Americans to accept the result. Trump's campaign saw his plea — and did not like it.
Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to the former president, tweeted at Hogan, a former two-term governor who is running for Senate: "You just ended your campaign."
Hogan, a prominent Trump critic, is running for an open Senate seat in the blue state of Maryland against Democrat Angela Alsobrooks. Though he has said he will caucus with the GOP, he has shifted to the center since winning the Republican nomination.
“Regardless of the result, I urge all Americans to respect the verdict and the legal process,” he posted on X, formerly Twitter. “… We must reaffirm what has made this nation great: the rule of law.”
Exactly what about that statement would cause a Trump advisor to imply Hogan's campaign for a Senate seat is over? I suggest there is nothing other than a lack of fealty to the toxic message coming from Trumpworld that the legal system is corrupt by definition if Trump is found guilty.
There are reasonable positions one could take in questioning the propriety of the trial. The relative novelty of the charges being one. But those observations are absent in the repetitive, dogmatic way Don's congressional defenders have lined up to parrot the party line. Relentlessly bashing the justice system. A system that afforded Don opportunities to defend himself every step of the way, including testifying in his own defense. Because as Larry Hogan has discovered, you jeopardize your political career in this POT if your total fidelity to him is seen as wanting.
But then Lara Trump leads the RNC and has stated her primary support will go to paying her father in laws legal bills instead of supporting local races
?Interesting that the voices in your head sound like Lara Trump.
"But then Lara Trump leads the RNC and has stated her primary support will go to paying her father in laws legal bills instead of supporting local races"
Whoops, it's AR.
What so you look down upon those who would rather deal with an real snake than an RINO snake in the grass that makes grifty deals (like Collins and Murkowski) for their votes?......After they are done with their "demands" you might get 15% of what you want even if the gop gets the leadership back and the taxpayer is always poorer for it.....No thanks.
Which part did you not understand?There is no elected Republican in the House or Senate giving you only 15% of what you want.
Obviously, you have no actual retort to what I said because you know I'm right. Have a nice day and enjoy losing like always.
You must mean the "news" as reported by outlets like Faux, otherwise known as Trump TV. For the rest of us, the verdict was a natural consequence of an evidence based decision by the grand jury to indict, and an evidence based decision by the jury to convict.There isn’t a person in the world who is aware of the news who doesn’t see this as a political lynching.
Oh really? Half the government leaders in the world only get Fox News?You must mean the "news" as reported by outlets like Faux, otherwise known as Trump TV. For the rest of us, the verdict was a natural consequence of an evidence based decision by the grand jury to indict, and an evidence based decision by the jury to convict.
