Rats are jumping off SS Trump: Donald Trump Has a Big Problem in the Senate ... Lindsey Graham sinks

[cnm]

/----/ So when were the Articles of Impeachment voted on and passed?
Key Takeaways: Impeachment Process

• The process of impeachment is established by the U.S. Constitution.
• The impeachment process must be initiated in the House of Representatives with the passage of a resolution listing the charges or “Articles of Impeachment” against the official being impeached.
• If passed by the House, the Articles of Impeachment are considered by the Senate in a trial presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, with the 100 Senators serving as the jury.
• If the Senate votes in favor of conviction by a 2/3 supermajority vote (67 votes), the Senate will then vote to remove the official from office.
• The Method and History of the US Impeachment Process

Yeah, right.
As though gathering evidence to construct the Articles of Impeachment is not part of the process.

 

[The Purge]

Scumbag. Lying OP Just can't help himself with all his fake news!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that all but three GOP senators had signed onto his resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry.

GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have not yet signed onto the resolution, according to an updated list of co-sponsors shared by Graham the day after he introduced the measure.

A spokesperson for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether or not she would back the resolution, which formally opposes the impeachment inquiry and urges House Democrats to hold an official vote on it.

A spokeswoman for Romney noted that he said on Thursday that he would look at the resolution.

"I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to decide whether there is support for impeachment. I’d love to see a more open process," Romney said.

Murkowski also told reporters on Thursday that she hadn't yet read the resolution.

The resolution also says the House should give President Trump "due process" including "the ability to confront his accusers" and that House Republicans should be able to subpoena their own witnesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

 

[BULLDOG]

First you bunch of dumb asses on the left have to have a valid reason for impeaching Trump. Hell you have Dem's in your own party who don't want to touch this third rail. Come here snowflakes...

Technically, the House can impeach Trump just for being a buffoon, liar and wearing orange makeup on his face, having a hideous hairdo, and having a history of molesting young women.

That's why you lost the election you people are mentally ill.

You don't know much about how impeachments work, do you?

 

[Billy_Bob]

First you bunch of dumb asses on the left have to have a valid reason for impeaching Trump. Hell you have Dem's in your own party who don't want to touch this third rail. Come here snowflakes...

Technically, the House can impeach Trump just for being a buffoon, liar and wearing orange makeup on his face, having a hideous hairdo, and having a history of molesting young women.

That's why you lost the election you people are mentally ill.

You don't know much about how impeachments work, do you?

You democraps haven got a clue how it works...

All you do is cry like babies and throw tantrums when you dont get your way..

 

[cnm]

Of course he is fit to be President. How, specifically, is he not?

The list is far too long to type.

Give me your top 5.

The fragile mess that is Individual1 fails all these categories.

These Are the 6 Essential Traits a President Needs, Says Doris Kearns Goodwin

https://www.history.com/topics/doris-kearns-goodwin-on-presidential-leadership
Below are six videos in which Goodwin discusses how these crucial leadership traits were brought to bear in times of national challenge:


EMPATHY
The ability to identify with other points of view can be a breakthrough leadership trait for a president. Goodwin highlights how empathy impacted President Johnson’s role in shaping the Civil Rights Act and the Great Society.

RESILIENCE
Learning from difficult moments lies at the core of great leaders. Goodwin explores how resilience and the ability to persevere became essential leadership traits for Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt.

COMMUNICATION
A leader’s ability to communicate can mean the difference between the status quo and greatness. Goodwin looks at how Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan lead a nation with their words.

OPENNESS
Goodwin looks at how Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt grew as presidents from listening to people with views different than their own.

IMPULSE CONTROL
Sometimes knowing what not to say is as important as what a president says. Goodwin pinpoints moments in history when presidents bit their tongue—and were better for it.

RELAXATION
From Franklin Roosevelt to Abraham Lincoln, America’s most iconic presidents knew that getting away from the White House could help them become better leaders. Goodwin explores the key to this presidential leadership trait.
​

 

[BULLDOG]

First you bunch of dumb asses on the left have to have a valid reason for impeaching Trump. Hell you have Dem's in your own party who don't want to touch this third rail. Come here snowflakes...

Technically, the House can impeach Trump just for being a buffoon, liar and wearing orange makeup on his face, having a hideous hairdo, and having a history of molesting young women.

That's why you lost the election you people are mentally ill.

You don't know much about how impeachments work, do you?

You democraps haven got a clue how it works...

All you do is cry like babies and throw tantrums when you dont get your way..

Yet the impeachment investigation continues unimpeded.

 

[The Purge]

 

[Denizen]

Scumbag. Lying OP Just can't help himself with all his fake news!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that all but three GOP senators had signed onto his resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry.

GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have not yet signed onto the resolution, according to an updated list of co-sponsors shared by Graham the day after he introduced the measure.

A spokesperson for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether or not she would back the resolution, which formally opposes the impeachment inquiry and urges House Democrats to hold an official vote on it.

A spokeswoman for Romney noted that he said on Thursday that he would look at the resolution.

"I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to decide whether there is support for impeachment. I’d love to see a more open process," Romney said.

Murkowski also told reporters on Thursday that she hadn't yet read the resolution.

The resolution also says the House should give President Trump "due process" including "the ability to confront his accusers" and that House Republicans should be able to subpoena their own witnesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

Lindsay Graham is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved.

 

[The Purge]

Scumbag. Lying OP Just can't help himself with all his fake news!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Friday that all but three GOP senators had signed onto his resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry.

GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mitt Romney (Utah) have not yet signed onto the resolution, according to an updated list of co-sponsors shared by Graham the day after he introduced the measure.

A spokesperson for Collins didn't immediately respond to a request for comment about whether or not she would back the resolution, which formally opposes the impeachment inquiry and urges House Democrats to hold an official vote on it.

A spokeswoman for Romney noted that he said on Thursday that he would look at the resolution.

"I’d like to see a vote taken in the House to decide whether there is support for impeachment. I’d love to see a more open process," Romney said.

Murkowski also told reporters on Thursday that she hadn't yet read the resolution.

The resolution also says the House should give President Trump "due process" including "the ability to confront his accusers" and that House Republicans should be able to subpoena their own witnesses.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

Lindsay Graham is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved.

The OP is toxic and is a known liar. Should be approached with extreme caution and disbelieved!!!!!

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ So when were the Articles of Impeachment voted on and passed?
Key Takeaways: Impeachment Process

• The process of impeachment is established by the U.S. Constitution.
• The impeachment process must be initiated in the House of Representatives with the passage of a resolution listing the charges or “Articles of Impeachment” against the official being impeached.
• If passed by the House, the Articles of Impeachment are considered by the Senate in a trial presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, with the 100 Senators serving as the jury.
• If the Senate votes in favor of conviction by a 2/3 supermajority vote (67 votes), the Senate will then vote to remove the official from office.
• The Method and History of the US Impeachment Process

Yeah, right.
As though gathering evidence to construct the Articles of Impeachment is not part of the process.

/——/ Yeah right????? That’s your response? Gather all you want and if nothing is found you still have impeachment? You moron.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ "very early in the impeachment process "
There is no impeachment process until there is a vote in Congress.

Here, learn something (besides what Hannity tells you to know)

Is it constitutionally acceptable for the House speaker to initiate an impeachment “by means of nothing more than a press conference”?

YES.

The Constitution simply says that the House has the sole power of impeachment.

Must the House Vote to Authorize an Impeachment Inquiry?

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment- just trying to dig up dirt or make stuff up. BTW, I haven’t listened to Hannity in years. You need to stop worshipping Fredo Cuomo.

 

[cnm]

/——/ Yeah right????? That’s your response? Gather all you want and if nothing is found you still have impeachment? You moron.

In that case the impeachment process may be halted. It's not as if the process has not begun. Well, unless one is a Deplorable, true enough.

 

[cnm]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

 

[rightwinger]

Trump says they are all liars, losers and low life’s.

We can only trust what Trump tells us

 

[cnm]

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?

Where is that in the Constitution? The courts say the rules are whatever Congress says they are. Too, according to your interpretation, even if there had been/is such a vote there would still be no impeachment process in progress.

 

[Camp]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

 

[cnm]

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Until then there's just the process.

 

[Camp]

/——/ So you admit there is no impeachment

Won't an actual impeachment require a successful vote on the Articles of Impeachment? An impeachment inquiry voted on by the full house doesn't mean there is an impeachment process in progress according to your interpretation of the phrase. Perhaps you'll be able to semantic it into oblivion.

/———/ When was there an impeachment inquiry vote?
Trump Impeachment Inquiry: House Must Vote or It’s Just a Democratic Stunt | National Review

The House is not required to have a vote according to a recent federal court ruling. In any case, as long as information and evidence are gathered it makes no difference what the House investigation is called. The evidence will be used in an Impeachment.

/—-/ So you agree, there is no impeachment until congress votes on it. Thanks

Sure, of course, a vote must be taken for Impeachment in the House. No vote is needed for the current Impeachment Inquire. Why did you edit my post and leave off the word "inquire"?