Raygun made over 250 recess appointments

[Avorysuds]

Interesting, this was before teleprompters and it looks like he couldn't even tell a fucking joke without reading from notes.

Bahahahaha....Thanks for the reminder that his Alzheimer's was early onset.

Thought I'd let you know, you're a worthless poster here. You voted for Obama, twice... Obama, the guy whose incompetence and ability to divide everyone, even his own base managed to in just 6 years make a country almost fully forget G.W.Bush was once the countries idiot President.

I wonder if Obama will claim the SC is wrong after he puts on his "constitutional scholars hat." Arrogant worthless chitbag.

So you know how I voted? And you're saying I have no cred? Bahahaha.... Now that must be where the SUDS comes into your screen name.

I wasn't even in this country in 2012, I was working abroad and did not do an absentee. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2008. But like Donald Rumsfeld said, we go to war with the army we have.

Sorry you are so threatened by my comments. Man up.

You voted for Obama twice... And I'm not threatened by you in any way other than you support your demi-god Obama on his clear goal of becoming the US's first King.

 

[regent]

Republicans have worked out a number of methods to prevent the Obama-government from functioning. The best one, was the simple shut-the-government-down method. Their latest one, of closing down Congress, but leave an out-to-lunch sign has some merit, but some see through the ploy, particularly when the Supreme Court gets involved.

 

[ogibillm]

The Court ruling was against the President, not Congress like you are trying to do.

no i understand the court ruling. the president overreached. the president overreached because the republicans in congress were throwing a tantrum and using a technicality to be obstructionists.

it's kind of a legally right, morally wrong thing. or morally right, legally wrong thing, depending on who you're talking about.

The President overreached because he refused to compromise and nominate another person who the majority could agree on.
This isn't the first time this has ever happened.
The same kind of things happened under Wilson and FDR because they refused to compromise and tried to force their ideology.
Whenever any of our Presidents try to force ideology over what is best for the country things like this happens and this is why we have the Supreme Court.

it had nothing to do with who the nominations were. it had everything to do with republicans not wanting the board to exist. the republicans were unwilling to compromise at all and resorted to technicalities to throw their tantrums

 

[Ibentoken]

Well, the USSC was unanimous. Perhaps the liberal judges turned racist. Is that possible?

 

[Kosh]

You have to understand this is the new far left talking point for the day.

It is to distract from the fact that Obama broke the law and violated the Constitution by appointing people while the senate was still in session.

I am happy the this was a unanimous decision and it should of have regardless of the letter behind the president who did it.

 

[Jarhead]

no i understand the court ruling. the president overreached. the president overreached because the republicans in congress were throwing a tantrum and using a technicality to be obstructionists.

it's kind of a legally right, morally wrong thing. or morally right, legally wrong thing, depending on who you're talking about.

The President overreached because he refused to compromise and nominate another person who the majority could agree on.
This isn't the first time this has ever happened.
The same kind of things happened under Wilson and FDR because they refused to compromise and tried to force their ideology.
Whenever any of our Presidents try to force ideology over what is best for the country things like this happens and this is why we have the Supreme Court.

it had nothing to do with who the nominations were. it had everything to do with republicans not wanting the board to exist. the republicans were unwilling to compromise at all and resorted to technicalities to throw their tantrums

Sort of what Obama does?

You know, resorting to technicalities to get his way?

Sorry bro...but it is the job of the GOP to represent their constituents.

 

[Jarhead]

Republicans have worked out a number of methods to prevent the Obama-government from functioning. The best one, was the simple shut-the-government-down method. Their latest one, of closing down Congress, but leave an out-to-lunch sign has some merit, but some see through the ploy, particularly when the Supreme Court gets involved.

Seems Obama and his staff of "some of the brightest minds in the country" didn't see through it.

 

[Jarhead]

Are you talking about Regan's?

Other Presidents' recess appointments
""Among recent presidents, Ronald Reagan made 240 recess appointments, George H. W. Bush made 77, Bill Clinton made 139, George W. Bush made 171, and Obama has made 32 so far."""
Justices rule for Congress in recess appointments fight - CNN.com

Missing the point? Obama's "recess" appointments were not recess appointments at all. They were illegal appointments. The full Supreme Court just said so.

And the SCOTUS also said it was legal for strangers to accost women in front of health care centers if they THOUGHT they might be going in to get an abortion, and struck down the 35' rule.

Wake up, you dumbass. They also ruled that corporations are people in 2010 and now your fucking vote doesn't count anymore, either. But just keep believin'....Big money counts on dolts like you.

That was your take on the ruling?

Man....you watch WAY TOO MANY liberal commentators.

 

[Jarhead]

it's called using a technicality to throw a tantrum. luckily it shouldn't be a problem anymore.

The Court ruling was against the President, not Congress like you are trying to do.

no i understand the court ruling. the president overreached. the president overreached because the republicans in congress were throwing a tantrum and using a technicality to be obstructionists.

it's kind of a legally right, morally wrong thing. or morally right, legally wrong thing, depending on who you're talking about.

You mean the GOP was doing what they believe their constituents want them to do?

And you criticize it?

Now I am starting to understand why you post the spin and the rhetoric you post. You believe it.

 

[Jarhead]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK3Eo9cScEQ

Interesting, this was before teleprompters and it looks like he couldn't even tell a fucking joke without reading from notes.

Bahahahaha....Thanks for the reminder that his Alzheimer's was early onset.

what are you....like......three?

Grow up and debate like an adult.

 

[Kosh]

no i understand the court ruling. the president overreached. the president overreached because the republicans in congress were throwing a tantrum and using a technicality to be obstructionists.

it's kind of a legally right, morally wrong thing. or morally right, legally wrong thing, depending on who you're talking about.

The President overreached because he refused to compromise and nominate another person who the majority could agree on.
This isn't the first time this has ever happened.
The same kind of things happened under Wilson and FDR because they refused to compromise and tried to force their ideology.
Whenever any of our Presidents try to force ideology over what is best for the country things like this happens and this is why we have the Supreme Court.

it had nothing to do with who the nominations were. it had everything to do with republicans not wanting the board to exist. the republicans were unwilling to compromise at all and resorted to technicalities to throw their tantrums

Interesting coming from a far left Obama drone that supports Obamacrae with hesitation or question.

 

[peach174]

no i understand the court ruling. the president overreached. the president overreached because the republicans in congress were throwing a tantrum and using a technicality to be obstructionists.

it's kind of a legally right, morally wrong thing. or morally right, legally wrong thing, depending on who you're talking about.

The President overreached because he refused to compromise and nominate another person who the majority could agree on.
This isn't the first time this has ever happened.
The same kind of things happened under Wilson and FDR because they refused to compromise and tried to force their ideology.
Whenever any of our Presidents try to force ideology over what is best for the country things like this happens and this is why we have the Supreme Court.

it had nothing to do with who the nominations were. it had everything to do with republicans not wanting the board to exist. the republicans were unwilling to compromise at all and resorted to technicalities to throw their tantrums

It had everything to do with ideology that would harm our businesses.

The board has withstood sharp political attacks in recent years, with Republicans and the business lobby accusing Obama-era board members of being overly friendly to labor unions at the expense of business owners.
This is about Obama rewarding the backers of the Democrat Party. The Unions.
It is about ideology over what is good for the country.

 

[The Rabbi]

Missing the point? Obama's "recess" appointments were not recess appointments at all. They were illegal appointments. The full Supreme Court just said so.

And the SCOTUS also said it was legal for strangers to accost women in front of health care centers if they THOUGHT they might be going in to get an abortion, and struck down the 35' rule.

Wake up, you dumbass. They also ruled that corporations are people in 2010 and now your fucking vote doesn't count anymore, either. But just keep believin'....Big money counts on dolts like you.

That was your take on the ruling?

Man....you watch WAY TOO MANY liberal commentators.

I heard the COurt declared open season on women and any woman within 20 feet of an aboriton clinic can be shot on sight by people with carry permits.

 

[FJO]

Comparing the number of Ronald Reagan's executive orders to those of Barack Obama's is like comparing 300 traffic tickets to 10 murders.

 

[Ibentoken]

If a single cell creature was found on Mars the world would be celebrating the discovery of "Life" on Mars, yet a human embro isn't a living human being.

 

[regent]

Republicans have worked out a number of methods to prevent the Obama-government from functioning. The best one, was the simple shut-the-government-down method. Their latest one, of closing down Congress, but leave an out-to-lunch sign has some merit, but some see through the ploy, particularly when the Supreme Court gets involved.

Seems Obama and his staff of "some of the brightest minds in the country" didn't see through it.

Perhaps it was an attempt to publicize the Republican tactics on recess, and the controversy on what is a recess? The unfortunate thing is that most people will see the whole Court case as winner and loser and not the games being played in DC.

 

[The Rabbi]

Republicans have worked out a number of methods to prevent the Obama-government from functioning. The best one, was the simple shut-the-government-down method. Their latest one, of closing down Congress, but leave an out-to-lunch sign has some merit, but some see through the ploy, particularly when the Supreme Court gets involved.

Seems Obama and his staff of "some of the brightest minds in the country" didn't see through it.

Perhaps it was an attempt to publicize the Republican tactics on recess, and the controversy on what is a recess? The unfortunate thing is that most people will see the whole Court case as winner and loser and not the games being played in DC.

The Constitution won. Obama lost.
Just like it should be. It was a big smack down on Obama. Even his own appointees couldnt go along with him.

 

[Camp]

250!!!! That's almost the same number of Marines he ordered to carry unloaded weapons in Lebanon that got blown up in the barracks by terrorist.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Thought I'd let you know, you're a worthless poster here. You voted for Obama, twice... Obama, the guy whose incompetence and ability to divide everyone, even his own base managed to in just 6 years make a country almost fully forget G.W.Bush was once the countries idiot President.

I wonder if Obama will claim the SC is wrong after he puts on his "constitutional scholars hat." Arrogant worthless chitbag.

So you know how I voted? And you're saying I have no cred? Bahahaha.... Now that must be where the SUDS comes into your screen name.

I wasn't even in this country in 2012, I was working abroad and did not do an absentee. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2008. But like Donald Rumsfeld said, we go to war with the army we have.

Sorry you are so threatened by my comments. Man up.

You voted for Obama twice... And I'm not threatened by you in any way other than you support your demi-god Obama on his clear goal of becoming the US's first King.

And you've got child pornography charges pending and have filed for bankruptcy.
See how easy that is?

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Seems Obama and his staff of "some of the brightest minds in the country" didn't see through it.

Perhaps it was an attempt to publicize the Republican tactics on recess, and the controversy on what is a recess? The unfortunate thing is that most people will see the whole Court case as winner and loser and not the games being played in DC.

The Constitution won. Obama lost.
Just like it should be. It was a big smack down on Obama. Even his own appointees couldnt go along with him.

Oh for christ's sake. Guess he's not the tyrannical dictator that you all SAY he is, now is he? Hahahaha....

Since when has the SCOTUS used the Constitution? Since Citizens United blew out the one man-one vote right?

Since they've now reversed the right to access our own airways in favor of Comcast and Verizon? THAT Constitution?

YOu are too stupid to breathe and type at the same time.