Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
We have the most guns by far, but not the lowest crime rates.
and other countries have extreme gun control and higher gun murder rates.....culture, not guns.
Then why do you keep insisting gun ownership effects crime rates?
because armed people do lower the crime rate...but it doesn't make it zero...and other factors can overcome an armed citizenship...like chicago...where the gangs control their aldermen....and keep the police levels low, prevent arrest and help keep gang members out of jail...
And only so many people are carrying guns, that leaves a lot of people not carrying guns...and criminals run away from someone who pulls a gun.....walk down a block and attack someone who doesn't have a gun.......
but...the person with the pistol stopped their criminal attack......
The leading way to reduce gun crime....arrest criminals who use guns and keep them locked up.....and yet you see over and over that prosecutors and judges do not do this......
Well I agree with your last statement. Would be nice if we actually reformed criminals.
Well....I'll settle for keeping them locked up....
here we go a list, side by side of the papers and what they show...
Of course, the single paper that Shermer cites was mentioned and discussed at length in the review of the literature that Lott provided in More Guns, Less Crime (click on screen shots to make them larger). Unfortunately, Scientific American wasn’t willing to allow a link to this list of papers.
![]()
Reforming seems more optimal as then you don't have to pay to jail them forever. But locked up is better than out committing more crimes.