Reid Changing Filibuster Rules

[Geaux4it]

how about adding 3 judges to a court that doesn't need them as stipulated, I already said they were not overloaded and their cases have fallen in fact ( see below). http://news.yahoo.com/filibuster-reaction-harry-reid-nuclear-hypocrisy-184412234.html

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

 

[Trajan]

how about adding 3 judges to a court that doesn't need them as stipulated, I already said they were not overloaded and their cases have fallen in fact ( see below). http://news.yahoo.com/filibuster-reaction-harry-reid-nuclear-hypocrisy-184412234.html

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

well look who's checking in? released so soon? did the treatment go well?


why did you cherry pick my post?

 

[Trajan]

how about adding 3 judges to a court that doesn't need them as stipulated, I already said they were not overloaded and their cases have fallen in fact ( see below). http://news.yahoo.com/filibuster-reaction-harry-reid-nuclear-hypocrisy-184412234.html

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Pwned...

 

[TemplarKormac]

You really think that a supermajority for routine judicial and administrative appointments is a good idea?

What is wrong with you, exactly?

Once again, you had a supermajority that forced that travesty of a healthcare law down America's throat. So did you really think a supermajority was needed for a legislative process instead of bipartisan support? Obviously, it's only good for you when you have one and nobody else.

How hypocritical are you, exactly?

Why don't you tell him and the rest of us, what is wrong with you, exactly?

Perhaps you should be quiet Sarah. Each time you speak we know what's wrong with you. Stop making people's case each time you post.

 

[Trajan]

You really think that a supermajority for routine judicial and administrative appointments is a good idea?

What is wrong with you, exactly?

Once again, you had a supermajority that forced that travesty of a healthcare law down America's throat. So did you really think a supermajority was needed for a legislative process instead of bipartisan support? Obviously, it's only good for you when you have one and nobody else.

How hypocritical are you, exactly?

Why don't you tell him and the rest of us, what is wrong with you, exactly?

you're getting pwned here too you know

.....what he said is dead on. bi-partisanship in your book appears to be;" we win you lose, you don't need to vote".

 

[Sarah G]

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Pwned...

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

 

[Sarah G]

Once again, you had a supermajority that forced that travesty of a healthcare law down America's throat. So did you really think a supermajority was needed for a legislative process instead of bipartisan support? Obviously, it's only good for you when you have one and nobody else.

How hypocritical are you, exactly?

Why don't you tell him and the rest of us, what is wrong with you, exactly?

you're getting pwned here too you know

.....what he said is dead on. bi-partisanship in your book appears to be;" we win you lose, you don't need to vote".

Uh oh, I guess I'm pwned again ...

 

[Geaux4it]

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Pwned...

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

So is the term 'forward' which Obama used as his campaign slogan. You know, seeing as it has long standing ties to socialism.

-Geaux

 

[Sarah G]

Pwned...

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

So is the term 'forward' which Obama used as his campaign slogan. You know, seeing as it has long standing ties to socialism.

-Geaux

Really? I did not know that.

 

[Geaux4it]

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

So is the term 'forward' which Obama used as his campaign slogan. You know, seeing as it has long standing ties to socialism.

-Geaux

Really? I did not know that.

Really

-Geaux

 

[Sarah G]

So is the term 'forward' which Obama used as his campaign slogan. You know, seeing as it has long standing ties to socialism.

-Geaux

Really? I did not know that.

Really

-Geaux

There you have it, he must be a socialist. You should call Homeland Security or something.

 

[Geaux4it]

Really? I did not know that.

Really

-Geaux

There you have it, he must be a socialist. You should call Homeland Security or something.

HS? Please

Would not want to bother them on a coincidence

-Geaux

 

[Sarah G]

Really

-Geaux

There you have it, he must be a socialist. You should call Homeland Security or something.

HS? Please

Would not want to bother them on a coincidence

-Geaux

well you were making it seem like such a conspiracy ...

 

[TemplarKormac]

Sarah's having one of her liberal meltdowns again. Must be all that pwnage. Could be an acute case of butthurt too.

 

[Geaux4it]

There you have it, he must be a socialist. You should call Homeland Security or something.

HS? Please

Would not want to bother them on a coincidence

-Geaux

well you were making it seem like such a conspiracy ...

So, its just a coincidence that he used that word? Maybe he wanted to change the context? Transformation and all?

I don't know

-Geaux

 

[Trajan]

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Pwned...

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

well, I like it, old counter strike term....and well, its better than being as vaporous as ones avatar...

 

[TemplarKormac]

how about adding 3 judges to a court that doesn't need them as stipulated, I already said they were not overloaded and their cases have fallen in fact ( see below). http://news.yahoo.com/filibuster-reaction-harry-reid-nuclear-hypocrisy-184412234.html

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

Actually, the nuclear option on it's merit is unconstitutional.

Article IV of the US Constitution says:

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

So, in effect Democrats have denied these Senators and their respective constituents a republican form of government. Please don't make me embarrass you.

 

[Synthaholic]

how about adding 3 judges to a court that doesn't need them as stipulated, I already said they were not overloaded and their cases have fallen in fact ( see below).

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Then, if you want him to pass a budget, you must also want him to fill these Constitutionally-mandated seats.

So you've already gotten half of what you wanted!

 

[BDBoop]

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Pwned...

What is all this pwned bullshit? It's an archaic term even for moronic Republicans.

I usually only hear it from pre-pubescent boys in WoW, waving their e-peens around.

Hmm.

 

[Geaux4it]

Ridiculous argument. It's the president's Constitutional responsibility to fill empty seats.

Why do conservatives only want to follow the Constitution when it agrees with them?

And he's also required to pass a budget

Just sayin

-Geaux

Then, if you want him to pass a budget, you must also want him to fill these Constitutionally-mandated seats.

So you've already gotten half of what you wanted!

Yes, he just needs to do what previous Presidents have done, select someone who will pass scrutiny

-Geaux