Remember folks when you read this ...THERE WERE NEVER NEVER any WMDs!!!

[BlindBoo]

most of the world believed the bad intel about WMDs.

In 2008 MSNBC reports the US removed 550 metric tons of yellowcake(Used to make nuclear weapons) from Iraq. This is the same yellowcake Joe Wilson, husband of Valerie Plame said Saddam never tried to get.

I hope George W. Bush is not waiting for an apology from the democrats who called him a liar.

THAT'S A LIE!!!

The 550 tons of yellowcake WAS NOT yellowcake from Africa, that Saddam was ACTIVELY SEEKING to EXPAND his nuclear program....as President Bush and his administration were telling us about.

GOT IT YET?

INFORM YOURSELF!!!!

The 550 tons of yellowcake was from DECADES AGO, for a program Saddam had in place in 1981, but the Israeli came in and bombed the crap out of his Nuclear Plant, and destroyed the facility. The USA and the UN and the whole world was aware of this OLD Yellowcake.... we also were aware of it in 1991 too, when we bombed a second nuclear plant of Saddam's during the Persian Gulf War/operation dessert storm....taking it out like a light.

Wilson WAS PROVEN RIGHT.... Saddam WAS NOT actively seeking to acquire yellowcake from Niger, as was told by President Bush in the State of the Union to us, and told to the UN....

AGAIN

YOU GOT THAT?

STOP regurgitating the lies you have bought in to....STOP IT NOW! For the sake of our Country, Only TRUTH will set us free....

And before you complain that this is Snopes.com ......there are PLENTY OF LINKS in the article supporting it.

snopes.com Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq

And then there is this from NBCNEWS U.S. removes yellowcake from Iraq - World news - Mideast N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq NBC News

Accusations that Saddam had tried to purchase more yellowcake from the African nation of Niger — and an article by a former U.S. ambassador refuting the claims — led to a wide-ranging probe into Washington leaks that reached high into the Bush administration.

Tuwaitha and an adjacent research facility were well known for decades as the centerpiece of Saddam's nuclear efforts.

Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War.

There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.

Saddam was NOT actively seeking to purchase yellowcake from Niger Africa, and the CIA knew this in 2002, after they had sent Wilson there....and the administration tried to discredit Wilson and Wilson's wife because they were upset with him for REVEALING THE TRUTH. Wake up!!!! It happened right before your very eyes. Seriously, it did....we were conned.

And then there is this as well...

U.S. and Iraqi forces have guarded the 23,000-acre site — surrounded by huge sand berms — following a wave of looting after Saddam's fall that included villagers toting away yellowcake storage barrels for use as drinking water cisterns.

It does NOT state that they emptied barrels of yellowcake to use these storage barrels as water containers as Vigilante stated earlier!!!

It said they used barrels (that were meant) for storage of yellowcake as water barrels...it DID not STATE the barrels were full of yellowcake and emptied by these looters....????

I love it when someone as uninformed as you bumps up against someone like me that actually worked in the nerve center of the Pentagon.

As I argued for months about the Iraq Status of Forces of Agreement that every liberal denied until Panetta, Gates, Ambassadors Crocker and Hill, and several generals came out and confirmed.....so it will be with what I said about both chemical and nuclear WMD.

I didn't expect the NY Times to one of the first though. LMAO

So then you agree with the Times article then?

First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/.../us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

 

[EconChick]

most of the world believed the bad intel about WMDs.

In 2008 MSNBC reports the US removed 550 metric tons of yellowcake(Used to make nuclear weapons) from Iraq. This is the same yellowcake Joe Wilson, husband of Valerie Plame said Saddam never tried to get.

I hope George W. Bush is not waiting for an apology from the democrats who called him a liar.

THAT'S A LIE!!!

The 550 tons of yellowcake WAS NOT yellowcake from Africa, that Saddam was ACTIVELY SEEKING to EXPAND his nuclear program....as President Bush and his administration were telling us about.

GOT IT YET?

INFORM YOURSELF!!!!

The 550 tons of yellowcake was from DECADES AGO, for a program Saddam had in place in 1981, but the Israeli came in and bombed the crap out of his Nuclear Plant, and destroyed the facility. The USA and the UN and the whole world was aware of this OLD Yellowcake.... we also were aware of it in 1991 too, when we bombed a second nuclear plant of Saddam's during the Persian Gulf War/operation dessert storm....taking it out like a light.

Wilson WAS PROVEN RIGHT.... Saddam WAS NOT actively seeking to acquire yellowcake from Niger, as was told by President Bush in the State of the Union to us, and told to the UN....

AGAIN

YOU GOT THAT?

STOP regurgitating the lies you have bought in to....STOP IT NOW! For the sake of our Country, Only TRUTH will set us free....

And before you complain that this is Snopes.com ......there are PLENTY OF LINKS in the article supporting it.

snopes.com Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq

And then there is this from NBCNEWS U.S. removes yellowcake from Iraq - World news - Mideast N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq NBC News

Accusations that Saddam had tried to purchase more yellowcake from the African nation of Niger — and an article by a former U.S. ambassador refuting the claims — led to a wide-ranging probe into Washington leaks that reached high into the Bush administration.

Tuwaitha and an adjacent research facility were well known for decades as the centerpiece of Saddam's nuclear efforts.

Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War.

There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.

Saddam was NOT actively seeking to purchase yellowcake from Niger Africa, and the CIA knew this in 2002, after they had sent Wilson there....and the administration tried to discredit Wilson and Wilson's wife because they were upset with him for REVEALING THE TRUTH. Wake up!!!! It happened right before your very eyes. Seriously, it did....we were conned.

And then there is this as well...

U.S. and Iraqi forces have guarded the 23,000-acre site — surrounded by huge sand berms — following a wave of looting after Saddam's fall that included villagers toting away yellowcake storage barrels for use as drinking water cisterns.

It does NOT state that they emptied barrels of yellowcake to use these storage barrels as water containers as Vigilante stated earlier!!!

It said they used barrels (that were meant) for storage of yellowcake as water barrels...it DID not STATE the barrels were full of yellowcake and emptied by these looters....????

I love it when someone as uninformed as you bumps up against someone like me that actually worked in the nerve center of the Pentagon.

As I argued for months about the Iraq Status of Forces of Agreement that every liberal denied until Panetta, Gates, Ambassadors Crocker and Hill, and several generals came out and confirmed.....so it will be with what I said about both chemical and nuclear WMD.

I didn't expect the NY Times to one of the first though. LMAO

So then you agree with the Times article then?

First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0[/QUOTE]

I haven't read most of the article other than the title....but as far as things being screwed up in Iraq.....of course many things got screwed up especially early on....and I was one of those firing off messages back to DC about things not right.......but after the surge the situation got turned around.

But that's more of a micro issue compared to the valid reasons Bush gave for going to Iraq that Dems AGREED WITH but have been conveniently denying after voting for those same reasons.


In other words, I'm pointing out yet one more reason why leaders in the Dem party are so bankrupt.

 

[BlindBoo]

Just more fall out from the Bush inspired Iraq Civil War. As confirmed by your Huffington Post piece.

Actually, Huffing Glue confirms these are Sadam era WMD's - which the USA has known about the entire time. You know this, but chose to lie about it because you have no honor or integrity.

{The analysis from The Times draws on interviews with American soldiers and previously unreleased government documents to show that the U.S. government has been aware that chemical weapons, intact or partially damaged and then repurposed, have been circulating in Iraq -- and harming soldiers -- since 2003. The newspaper confirmed U.S. soldiers had come across mustard shells at Muthanna in 2008, and said three Times journalists saw old chemical stocks there in 2013.}

So again, Obama has known that Iraq had WMD's his entire term, and has lied continuously for partisan reasons.

More precisely, Raygun era WMD. Fact is the old stockpiles, lost, abandoned or hidden on purpose were not the WMD the Bush Administration was claiming Saddam was actively producing. No amount of lying or calling people childish names will ever change that.

Boo, I told ya you're one of the few libs I enjoy debating with because you always keep it respectful.

So let me point out the contradiction in your own statement. You say "well yeah this is WMD but not the WMD Bush...."

You just admitted there was WMD there regardless of who said what.

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them. The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

 

[Uncensored2008]

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them.

So when you said there were no WMD's - you were just lying through your fucking teeth for partisan gain?

The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

The claims by the Bush administration that Saddam had large stockpiles of weapons not disclosed to inspectors is true - irrefutable. Obama has known about it since at least 2008, meaning he has constantly and repeatedly lied about this to the American people, for partisan gain.

 

[BlindBoo]

More precisely, Raygun era WMD.

Reagan left office in 1989, not 2003.

Fact is the old stockpiles, lost, abandoned or hidden on purpose were not the WMD the Bush Administration was claiming Saddam was actively producing. No amount of lying or calling people childish names will ever change that.

Of course you lie, you hold party above all and have not a hint of integrity. These ware 2003 era and have been used against U.S. Soldiers.

{The analysis from The Times draws on interviews with American soldiers and previously unreleased government documents to show that the U.S. government has been aware that chemical weapons, intact or partially damaged and then repurposed, have been circulating in Iraq -- and harming soldiers -- since 2003. The newspaper confirmed U.S. soldiers had come across mustard shells at Muthanna in 2008, and said three Times journalists saw old chemical stocks there in 2013.}

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...p-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

You don't give a fuck though, you only care about your party. That Bush was correct and Saddam had an active WMD program is only meaningful to you in that you want to lie and distort to cover it up, in order to protect your party. That U.S. soldiers died from these isn't worth a pile of dogshit to you - you only care about what the exposure of facts mean to the power of your party.

That Obama and the press have lied for a decade is nothing to you - you only wish that you could continue the lie, lest facts harm your party in the midterms.

Better a Saran attack in the New York Subways than the GOP taking the Senate - you have priorities - party above all - always.

So he left in 1989. No WMD produced after 1991 were found in Iraq.

Such a foul mouthed drama queen. Repurposed into IED's without realizing the shells they used contained and chmeical. There were reports of these during the occupation.

Really? You should get some new writers for your scripts, they're getting stale.

 

[Discombobulated]

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

1. MAY 2004 Two soldiers exposed to sarin from a shell near Baghdad’s Yarmouk neighborhood.
2. SUMMER 2006 Over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets found at this former Republican Guard compound.
3. JULY 2008 Six Marines exposed to mustard agent from an artillery shell at an abandoned bunker.
4. AUGUST 2008 Five American soldiers exposed to mustard agent while destroying a weapons cache.
5. 2010 OR EARLY 2011 Hundreds of mustard rounds discovered in a container at this Iraqi security compound.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

Before we went to war in Iraq we heard a lot about a nuclear weapons program. That turned out to be complete fucking bullshit.

 

[GreenBean]

Just more fall out from the Bush inspired Iraq Civil War. As confirmed by your Huffington Post piece.

Actually, Huffing Glue confirms these are Sadam era WMD's - which the USA has known about the entire time. You know this, but chose to lie about it because you have no honor or integrity.

{The analysis from The Times draws on interviews with American soldiers and previously unreleased government documents to show that the U.S. government has been aware that chemical weapons, intact or partially damaged and then repurposed, have been circulating in Iraq -- and harming soldiers -- since 2003. The newspaper confirmed U.S. soldiers had come across mustard shells at Muthanna in 2008, and said three Times journalists saw old chemical stocks there in 2013.}

So again, Obama has known that Iraq had WMD's his entire term, and has lied continuously for partisan reasons.

More precisely, Raygun era WMD. Fact is the old stockpiles, lost, abandoned or hidden on purpose were not the WMD the Bush Administration was claiming Saddam was actively producing. No amount of lying or calling people childish names will ever change that.

Boo, I told ya you're one of the few libs I enjoy debating with because you always keep it respectful.

So let me point out the contradiction in your own statement. You say "well yeah this is WMD but not the WMD Bush...."

You just admitted there was WMD there regardless of who said what.

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them. The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

Wow , you truly are Blind , as well deaf and definitely about as dumb as they come , most of the garbage you've been posted doesn't even warrant a reply and it is very apparent that you will never ever ever let the Truth interfere with your half baked opinions.

I came here for serious debate , not to watch some bongo playing thumbsucker - the village called and they don't want their idiot back - we don't want you either.

 

[GreenBean]

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

1. MAY 2004 Two soldiers exposed to sarin from a shell near Baghdad’s Yarmouk neighborhood.
2. SUMMER 2006 Over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets found at this former Republican Guard compound.
3. JULY 2008 Six Marines exposed to mustard agent from an artillery shell at an abandoned bunker.
4. AUGUST 2008 Five American soldiers exposed to mustard agent while destroying a weapons cache.
5. 2010 OR EARLY 2011 Hundreds of mustard rounds discovered in a container at this Iraqi security compound.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

Before we went to war in Iraq we heard a lot about a nuclear weapons program. That turned out to be complete fucking bullshit.

It remains UNPROVEN ... "bullshit" implies that it was false . It was based on intel which both Democrats and Republicans alike read and agreed with .

 

[EconChick]

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

1. MAY 2004 Two soldiers exposed to sarin from a shell near Baghdad’s Yarmouk neighborhood.
2. SUMMER 2006 Over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets found at this former Republican Guard compound.
3. JULY 2008 Six Marines exposed to mustard agent from an artillery shell at an abandoned bunker.
4. AUGUST 2008 Five American soldiers exposed to mustard agent while destroying a weapons cache.
5. 2010 OR EARLY 2011 Hundreds of mustard rounds discovered in a container at this Iraqi security compound.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

Before we went to war in Iraq we heard a lot about a nuclear weapons program. That turned out to be complete fucking bullshit.

Righttttttttttttt, dumbass. Obama knows those were moved too. Just like he knew chem WMD was there..................that now the NYTimes is forced to admit after protecting the big WMD lie for all these years.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So he left in 1989. No WMD produced after 1991 were found in Iraq.

Such a foul mouthed drama queen. Repurposed into IED's without realizing the shells they used contained and chmeical. There were reports of these during the occupation.

Really? You should get some new writers for your scripts, they're getting stale.

First off, you are pulling the 1991 date out of your ass.

Secondly, even if that were true, it would alter nothing. Obama has known since at least 2008 that Saddam indeed had stockpiles of WMD's in 2003, just as Bush claimed. Obama and the party/press knew this, but continued to lie - for partisan effect.

 

[EconChick]

Just more fall out from the Bush inspired Iraq Civil War. As confirmed by your Huffington Post piece.

Actually, Huffing Glue confirms these are Sadam era WMD's - which the USA has known about the entire time. You know this, but chose to lie about it because you have no honor or integrity.

{The analysis from The Times draws on interviews with American soldiers and previously unreleased government documents to show that the U.S. government has been aware that chemical weapons, intact or partially damaged and then repurposed, have been circulating in Iraq -- and harming soldiers -- since 2003. The newspaper confirmed U.S. soldiers had come across mustard shells at Muthanna in 2008, and said three Times journalists saw old chemical stocks there in 2013.}

So again, Obama has known that Iraq had WMD's his entire term, and has lied continuously for partisan reasons.

More precisely, Raygun era WMD. Fact is the old stockpiles, lost, abandoned or hidden on purpose were not the WMD the Bush Administration was claiming Saddam was actively producing. No amount of lying or calling people childish names will ever change that.

Boo, I told ya you're one of the few libs I enjoy debating with because you always keep it respectful.

So let me point out the contradiction in your own statement. You say "well yeah this is WMD but not the WMD Bush...."

You just admitted there was WMD there regardless of who said what.

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them. The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

Blindboo's quote: "We always knew he had WMD because..."


Which is why I've been pissed for years watching the fucking lying lib politicians (Hillary Clinton most of all) who knew the truth say NO WMD

NO WMD



NO WMD




NO WMD



Fucking lying, incompetent, useless POS Democrats.

 

[BlindBoo]

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them.

So when you said there were no WMD's - you were just lying through your fucking teeth for partisan gain?

The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

The claims by the Bush administration that Saddam had large stockpiles of weapons not disclosed to inspectors is true - irrefutable. Obama has known about it since at least 2008, meaning he has constantly and repeatedly lied about this to the American people, for partisan gain.

Please provide the quote where I said Iraq never had any WMD! .

 

[BlindBoo]

So he left in 1989. No WMD produced after 1991 were found in Iraq.

Such a foul mouthed drama queen. Repurposed into IED's without realizing the shells they used contained and chmeical. There were reports of these during the occupation.

Really? You should get some new writers for your scripts, they're getting stale.

First off, you are pulling the 1991 date out of your ass.

Secondly, even if that were true, it would alter nothing. Obama has known since at least 2008 that Saddam indeed had stockpiles of WMD's in 2003, just as Bush claimed. Obama and the party/press knew this, but continued to lie - for partisan effect.

This is from the NYT article. Furthermore within the article is the reason why the US government had a stake in keeping these old ordinance(sp) they found on the QT. Care to venture a guess on what that reason is?

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

 

[Uncensored2008]

Please provide the quote where I said Iraq never had any WMD! .

You're kidding, right?

How about this pile of shit from the lying leftists at Mother Jones?

Lie by Lie A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq Mother Jones

Or how about the Communists at Salon?

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - Salon.com

I can do a thousand more.

The radical left and the corrupt press has insisted for over a decade that there were no WMD's - now you claim you knew they were there all along.

So why did you lie about it?

Well we know, party above all - always.

 

[BlindBoo]

Just more fall out from the Bush inspired Iraq Civil War. As confirmed by your Huffington Post piece.

Actually, Huffing Glue confirms these are Sadam era WMD's - which the USA has known about the entire time. You know this, but chose to lie about it because you have no honor or integrity.

{The analysis from The Times draws on interviews with American soldiers and previously unreleased government documents to show that the U.S. government has been aware that chemical weapons, intact or partially damaged and then repurposed, have been circulating in Iraq -- and harming soldiers -- since 2003. The newspaper confirmed U.S. soldiers had come across mustard shells at Muthanna in 2008, and said three Times journalists saw old chemical stocks there in 2013.}

So again, Obama has known that Iraq had WMD's his entire term, and has lied continuously for partisan reasons.

More precisely, Raygun era WMD. Fact is the old stockpiles, lost, abandoned or hidden on purpose were not the WMD the Bush Administration was claiming Saddam was actively producing. No amount of lying or calling people childish names will ever change that.

Boo, I told ya you're one of the few libs I enjoy debating with because you always keep it respectful.

So let me point out the contradiction in your own statement. You say "well yeah this is WMD but not the WMD Bush...."

You just admitted there was WMD there regardless of who said what.

We always knew he had WMD because we helped him acquire them. The fact remains that the claims the Bush administration made were that Iraq was actively producing and stockpile large quantities of new weapons. They weren't, and the NYT article says no different.

Blindboo's quote: "We always knew he had WMD because..."


Which is why I've been pissed for years watching the fucking lying lib politicians (Hillary Clinton most of all) who knew the truth say NO WMD

NO WMD



NO WMD




NO WMD



Fucking lying, incompetent, useless POS Democrats.

It's funny that you're mad about that, but not at all mad that no WMD that President Bush claimed Iraq was actively producing was ever found.

 

[Discombobulated]

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

1. MAY 2004 Two soldiers exposed to sarin from a shell near Baghdad’s Yarmouk neighborhood.
2. SUMMER 2006 Over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets found at this former Republican Guard compound.
3. JULY 2008 Six Marines exposed to mustard agent from an artillery shell at an abandoned bunker.
4. AUGUST 2008 Five American soldiers exposed to mustard agent while destroying a weapons cache.
5. 2010 OR EARLY 2011 Hundreds of mustard rounds discovered in a container at this Iraqi security compound.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

Before we went to war in Iraq we heard a lot about a nuclear weapons program. That turned out to be complete fucking bullshit.

Righttttttttttttt, dumbass. Obama knows those were moved too. Just like he knew chem WMD was there..................that now the NYTimes is forced to admit after protecting the big WMD lie for all these years.

This just gets better and better. So now your theory is that the infrastructure of a nuclear weapons program was moved somewhere......is that right?

 

[Uncensored2008]

This just gets better and better. So now your theory is that the infrastructure of a nuclear weapons program was moved somewhere......is that right?

Yeah, it's going to do wonders for you in the mid-terms Comrade.

Count on it.

 

[Discombobulated]

This just gets better and better. So now your theory is that the infrastructure of a nuclear weapons program was moved somewhere......is that right?

Yeah, it's going to do wonders for you in the mid-terms Comrade.

Count on it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Please provide the quote where I said Iraq never had any WMD! .

You're kidding, right?

How about this pile of shit from the lying leftists at Mother Jones?

Lie by Lie A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq Mother Jones

Or how about the Communists at Salon?

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - Salon.com

I can do a thousand more.

The radical left and the corrupt press has insisted for over a decade that there were no WMD's - now you claim you knew they were there all along.

So why did you lie about it?

Well we know, party above all - always.

Sure sure pretend the left never claimed Raygun supplied Saddam with the ability to make advanced C\chemical and biological weapons.

Who Armed Iraq CounterPunch Tells the Facts Names the Names

Rumsfeld himself who, as President Reagan’s Middle East Envoy, had traveled to the Region to meet with Saddam Hussein in December 1983 to normalize, particularly, security relations.

At the time of the visit , Iraq had already been removed from the State Department’s list of terrorist countries in 1982; and in the previous month, November, President Reagan had approved National Security Decision Directive 114, on expansion of U.S.-Iraq relations generally. But it was Donald Rumsfeld’s trip to Baghdad which opened of the floodgates during 1985-90 for lucrative U.S. weapons exports–some $1.5 billion worth– including chemical/biological and nuclear weapons equipment and technology, along with critical components for missile delivery systems for all of the above. According to a 1994 GAO Letter Report (GAO/NSIAD-94-98) some 771 weapons export licenses for Iraq were approved during this six year period….not by our European allies, but by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

 

[BlindBoo]

the UN was LIED TO... or did you forget Colin Powell standing there with pretend yellowcake?

The UN was lied to by your filthy party. Powell laid out facts - as is now revealed. Iraq had and still has chemical and biological weapons.

You and the corrupt press have lied to the American people for a decade.

you might also want to use the google and look up the final report of hans blix, the UN inspector.

thanks.

You might want to use Gooogle and look up "caught red handed in a lie."

Because you have been - right before the midterms.

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0[/QUOTE]

.

That's not the latest information. It can be found RIGHT OUT IN OPEN SOURCE that ISIS - whose had control of that area for sometime - has been able to use some of that older stuff in Syria. Not all of it could be used (those that were from Iran/Iraq war) but some of it could.

So much for saying all of it's too old.

I can't deny the possibility, however I believe that was mustard gas which could have come from a variety of places.