Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, the law for Congress is more transparent than the one for most of Corporate America./—-/ Congress makes the law to protect themselves. Too bad for Trump who watched Bragg distort the law to prosecute him.
NOT true if they were legit claims they wouldn't be secret you retard.Because their employees filed claims against their employer that needed to be adjudicated.
Why not? Victims may want to maintain their privacy.NOT true if they were legit claims they wouldn't be secret you retard.
/——/ You’re not getting, or even worse, ignoring the hypocrisy.Actually, the law for Congress is more transparent than the one for most of Corporate America.
And understandably so. If you have an accusation of sexual harassment, most companies DON'T broadcast it. Even if they decide to fire people or do settlements, it's not something they make public.
No hypocrisy at all./——/ You’re not getting, or even worse, ignoring the hypocrisy.
No it isnt if someone was sexually harassed by a member of Congress that is news.No hypocrisy at all.
This is a personnel/employee action, which BY LAW have to be treated with confidentiality.
People aren't being paid "Hush Money", they are having workplace disputes (some of which are sexual harassment claims, most are not) resolved by an arbitrator, with monetary damages being awarded if appropriate.
This is quite different than someone paying hush money to influence an election, and then falsifying documents to hide the payments.
If that is the case, the person has the option of going public.No it isnt if someone was sexually harassed by a member of Congress that is news.
/——-/ Wanna bet some Senator or Congressman banging an intern in the cloakroom doesn’t want his constituents to know about it?No hypocrisy at all.
This is a personnel/employee action, which BY LAW have to be treated with confidentiality.
People aren't being paid "Hush Money", they are having workplace disputes (some of which are sexual harassment claims, most are not) resolved by an arbitrator, with monetary damages being awarded if appropriate.
This is quite different than someone paying hush money to influence an election, and then falsifying documents to hide the payments.
I'm sure they didn't./——-/ Wanna bet some Senator or Congressman banging an intern in the cloakroom doesn’t want his constituents to know about it?
Are you that naive?
/——/ Oh you mean the misdemeanor bookkeeping error that past the statute of limitations?I'm sure they didn't.
And if they come forward, I'll be the first one to support them, no matter which party the offender belonged to.
None of this excuses what Trump did.
..and Al Franken.Hey remember when John Edwards used campaign funds to hide an extra-marital affair with Reille Hunter?
Republicans were fine with prosecuting him for it.
John Edwards extramarital affair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges. He faced a maximum sentence of thirty years in prison and a $1.5 million fine, or a USD250,000 fine and/or five years imprisonment per charge.[108] The indictment came after the failure of intensive negotiations for a plea bargain. The agreement would have meant that Edwards would have been required to plead guilty to three misdemeanor campaign finance law violations, in addition to a six-month prison sentence, but would have allowed Edwards to keep his law license.[109]
After delays, due to Edwards' medical condition, jury selection for the trial began on April 12, 2012. Opening statements began on April 23.[110] A verdict (not guilty on one count and a mistrial on the remaining five) to the trial was reached on May 31, 2012.[111]
So were most Democrats, actually.
It seems to me that if hiding an affair from your cancer-stricken wife is bad, so is hiding an affair from your pregnant wife.
/——/ What tax fraud? What election interference? When was Trump convicted of those?No, I mean the 34 felonies done in pursuit of tax fraud and election interference.
Keep defending your sex criminals in Congress, Simp.If that is the case, the person has the option of going public.
But again, standard practice is to go through HR to resolve the problem.
Sexual Harassment can cover a wide array of stuff.
From the kinds of things Trump bragged about on the Access Hollywood tape as something as innocuous as commenting on an employee's dress or telling an off-color joke in the office.
How did it interfere with an election when the entry was done after the election, Moron?No, I mean the 34 felonies done in pursuit of tax fraud and election interference.
John Kerry had his MEGA yacht delivered to another state and didn't pay taxes in Massachusetts.Sounds pretty straightfoward to me, and they've sent thousands of people to jail for the same crime.
Survey of Past New York Felony Prosecutions for Falsifying Business Records
A survey of years of New York criminal cases, which shows that the prosecution of falsifying business records in first degree is common.www.justsecurity.org
- The People of the State of New York v. Josue Aguilar Dubon, AKA Saady Dubon, AKA Alejandro Ortiz (October 2022) — Bronx business owner indicted for failing to report over $1 million in income, avoiding paying $60,000 in taxes.
- The People of the State of New York v. Scott Kirtland (February 2022) — Insurance broker indicted for allegedly creating/filing fraudulent certificates of liability insurance to further scheme to defraud.
- The People of the State of New York v. James Garner (November 2021) — Mental health therapy aide indicted for allegedly defrauding over $35,000 in workers’ compensation benefits.
- The People of the State of New York v. Jose Palmer (November 2016) — Pleaded guilty to petit larceny for unemployment benefits fraud of over $3,000, having initially been indicted for grand larceny and falsifying business records in the first degree.
- The People of the State of New York v. Jason Holley (November 2016) — Convicted by jury of falsifying business records in the first degree but acquitted of the predicate crime, insurance fraud.
- The People of the State of New York v. Christina Murray (May 2015) & People v. Terrel Murray (May 2014) — Married couple convicted of house fire insurance claim, attempting to recover the cash value of various items of property that were ostensibly lost in the fire.
- The People of the State of New York v. Barbara A. Freeland (June 2013) — Convicted for falsely claiming on a food stamps application that a young adult lived with her.
- The People of the State of New York v. Maria F. Ramirez (August 2010) — Convicted for returning unpurchased items to a store in exchange for store credit, thus causing a false entry in a business record of an enterprise, and using the store credit to purchase additional items one day.
/——/ And inspite of us “been over this” you still haven’t answered my question. When was Trump convicted of tax fraud and election interference?Oh, we've been over this. Your guy lost. Deal with it.
