Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The central question is whether a baker has the right to refuse service to someone, based on any discriminatory factor, including race, religion, politics, or anything else. Does it matter if the customer is black, gay, jewish, pro-Trump, whatever? It's hard to believe the customer can't find somebody else to bake the cake or bake one him/herself. So where's the harm? What's the big deal? Go get your cake somewhere else, and eat it too.
The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.Since you don't think PA laws are appropriate, what have YOU been actively doing in your state to get those laws repealed?No social events of any kind are covered, that would include birthdays and weddings.
.
So you think that DJ's that do weddings have the right to only do wedding between white people?
Sure, I don't believe in forced association of any kind. If a company doesn't want to provide a good or service to me, I'll find someone who will. The market will decide if the they remain in business, I don't need a nanny government to run my life, no adult should.
.
I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.Since you don't think PA laws are appropriate, what have YOU been actively doing in your state to get those laws repealed?So you think that DJ's that do weddings have the right to only do wedding between white people?
Sure, I don't believe in forced association of any kind. If a company doesn't want to provide a good or service to me, I'll find someone who will. The market will decide if the they remain in business, I don't need a nanny government to run my life, no adult should.
.
I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
Show me in the Constitution where the feds are allowed to regulate a local bakery that doesn't ship their products interstate.
.
ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
Again, given the rest of us subsidize businesses through public services and utilities, no, they shouldn't.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.Since you don't think PA laws are appropriate, what have YOU been actively doing in your state to get those laws repealed?Sure, I don't believe in forced association of any kind. If a company doesn't want to provide a good or service to me, I'll find someone who will. The market will decide if the they remain in business, I don't need a nanny government to run my life, no adult should.
.
I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
Show me in the Constitution where the feds are allowed to regulate a local bakery that doesn't ship their products interstate.
.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.Since you don't think PA laws are appropriate, what have YOU been actively doing in your state to get those laws repealed?
I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
Show me in the Constitution where the feds are allowed to regulate a local bakery that doesn't ship their products interstate.
.
The supremacy clause only applies to enumerated powers, the feds have on enumerated power over intrastate business.
.
So.....you "chose" the opposite sex?Bakers refused to make pro-Trump birthday cake for 9-year-old boy: Report
Bakers refused to make pro-Trump birthday cake for 9-year-old boy: Report
and?
I'm pretty sure trump freaks aren't a protected class.
I'm pretty sure that faggots being a protected class make then 2nd class.
I'm sure that you are wrong about a lot of things. That one included.
Not in this case, faggot lover. If you don't have the good sense to choose the opposite sex, you deserve the classification.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
Show me in the Constitution where the feds are allowed to regulate a local bakery that doesn't ship their products interstate.
.
The supremacy clause only applies to enumerated powers, the feds have on enumerated power over intrastate business.
.
No. It applies to the entire Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority. Protected classes are defined by federal laws made pursuant to the constitution. You don't know what you are talking about.
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
Show me in the Constitution where the feds are allowed to regulate a local bakery that doesn't ship their products interstate.
.
The supremacy clause only applies to enumerated powers, the feds have on enumerated power over intrastate business.
.
No. It applies to the entire Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority. Protected classes are defined by federal laws made pursuant to the constitution. You don't know what you are talking about.
Why shouldn't they be?
The protected class concept was born of actual economic and political discrimination due to Jim Crow laws in Southern States after the Redeemers came to power. It was a sledgehammer solution to a specific problem.
What progressives did is take that solution and applied to to any group of people they think are disadvantaged, regardless of the actual economic and political harm being done to them. This is patently wrong and unfair.
Are you arguing that gays aren't subject to a long history of discrimination? Until fairly recently, the mere gay sex act was considered a crime.
Most reasonable people can tell what is a reasonable use of government power to resolve disputes.
The Supreme Court has ruled that your theory is ass backward. When the Supreme Court rules, its ruling become Constitutional. The protected class is being provided equal protection under the Supreme Court rulings. In addition, your theory of "forced servitude" in nonsense. No one is forcing the baker to be a baker. If the baker does not like or agree with federal and state laws that regulate that business, they have the option of not being in that business, or at least in that business to the degree that they make the controversial products, personalized cakes in this instance.Since you don't think PA laws are appropriate, what have YOU been actively doing in your state to get those laws repealed?No social events of any kind are covered, that would include birthdays and weddings.
.
So you think that DJ's that do weddings have the right to only do wedding between white people?
Sure, I don't believe in forced association of any kind. If a company doesn't want to provide a good or service to me, I'll find someone who will. The market will decide if the they remain in business, I don't need a nanny government to run my life, no adult should.
.
I've informed all my elected reps of my opinion. The 13th amendment supposedly abolished forced servitude. The 14th supposedly provide for equal protections under the law. Forcing people to serve any "protected class" violates both.
.
lol asshole."protected class" that terminology just screams discrimination.
I'm sorry, I didn't hear it say that. I heard it say "I'm the law"
I understand its the law. Sorry, im just not one for institutional discrimination. Maybe thats more your thing.
I'm sorry. Did you think I could change the law? I can't, so the law continues to say you are wrong. You lose.
The only thing I think you can do is kiss Obama's black ass. Pucker up.
Such a mature response for a right winger. Keep up the good work.
Don't get why trumpanzees are getting a bad "racist" rap.I would if it was low. I'm white, therefore, it's automatically higher than the average IQ of blacks.Not in this case, faggot lover. If you don't have the good sense to choose the opposite sex, you deserve the classification.
If you say so.
I know so. You should learn if you're capable, BOY.
you should probably worry about your own low IQ before you worry about other people's educations.
BOY.
WHORE
ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
As always. your thoughts have been noted and laughed at.Why shouldn't they be?
The protected class concept was born of actual economic and political discrimination due to Jim Crow laws in Southern States after the Redeemers came to power. It was a sledgehammer solution to a specific problem.
What progressives did is take that solution and applied to to any group of people they think are disadvantaged, regardless of the actual economic and political harm being done to them. This is patently wrong and unfair.
You are free to try to have the law changed. I doubt you can do that by sitting behind that keyboard.
As usual deflecting with the "do something" cop out when you don't have an actual point to argue.
Not sure what you expected. You complained that you feel the law is unfair. You can continue to whine about it, or try to have it changed. Whining hasn't worked for you on this so far.
I'm discussing a topic on a message board. You see fit to ignore that concept and spout "fuh fuh fuh, it's the law, fuh fuh fuh change it" because you are a gutless coward and refuse to discuss the reasoning behind the law and its application.
You're so cute when you try to act tough,ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
Why is it that Conservatives wouldn't have a problem being told by a faggot owned bakery t
As always. your thoughts have been noted and laughed at.You are free to try to have the law changed. I doubt you can do that by sitting behind that keyboard.
As usual deflecting with the "do something" cop out when you don't have an actual point to argue.
Not sure what you expected. You complained that you feel the law is unfair. You can continue to whine about it, or try to have it changed. Whining hasn't worked for you on this so far.
I'm discussing a topic on a message board. You see fit to ignore that concept and spout "fuh fuh fuh, it's the law, fuh fuh fuh change it" because you are a gutless coward and refuse to discuss the reasoning behind the law and its application.
As always, YOU have been laughed at, BOY.
You're so cute when you try to act tough,ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
Why is it that Conservatives wouldn't have a problem being told by a faggot owned bakery t
As always. your thoughts have been noted and laughed at.As usual deflecting with the "do something" cop out when you don't have an actual point to argue.
Not sure what you expected. You complained that you feel the law is unfair. You can continue to whine about it, or try to have it changed. Whining hasn't worked for you on this so far.
I'm discussing a topic on a message board. You see fit to ignore that concept and spout "fuh fuh fuh, it's the law, fuh fuh fuh change it" because you are a gutless coward and refuse to discuss the reasoning behind the law and its application.
As always, YOU have been laughed at, BOY.
Bakers refused to make pro-Trump birthday cake for 9-year-old boy: Report
Bakers refused to make pro-Trump birthday cake for 9-year-old boy: Report
You're so cute when you try to act tough,ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
Why is it that Conservatives wouldn't have a problem being told by a faggot owned bakery t
As always. your thoughts have been noted and laughed at.Not sure what you expected. You complained that you feel the law is unfair. You can continue to whine about it, or try to have it changed. Whining hasn't worked for you on this so far.
I'm discussing a topic on a message board. You see fit to ignore that concept and spout "fuh fuh fuh, it's the law, fuh fuh fuh change it" because you are a gutless coward and refuse to discuss the reasoning behind the law and its application.
As always, YOU have been laughed at, BOY.
Just laughing at you, porch monkey. Or do you prefer jiggaboo, alligator bait, spear chucker, blue gum, coon, or tar baby instead?
You're so cute when you try to act tough,ALL private businesses should have the right to refuse service for any reason.
Why is it that Conservatives wouldn't have a problem being told by a faggot owned bakery t
As always. your thoughts have been noted and laughed at.I'm discussing a topic on a message board. You see fit to ignore that concept and spout "fuh fuh fuh, it's the law, fuh fuh fuh change it" because you are a gutless coward and refuse to discuss the reasoning behind the law and its application.
As always, YOU have been laughed at, BOY.
Just laughing at you, porch monkey. Or do you prefer jiggaboo, alligator bait, spear chucker, blue gum, coon, or tar baby instead?
I'm guessing you think I'm black.
