Remember: There Was No ‘Insurrection’ on January 6, 2021

[Dante Reawakened]

The Dims keep pushing this meme, but only the terminally gullible are fooled.

Remember: There Was No ‘Insurrection’ on January 6, 2021

pjmedia.com

​

​

Old Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the rest of the Democrat establishment spent Friday commemorating what the Left would have us believe was a greater threat to “our democracy” than the Pearl Harbor attack or 9/11. In the face of this Big Lie that keeps getting bigger, it’s important to remember: There was actually no “insurrection.” There was no plan, no leader, no weapons, and no casualties except among those who entered the Capitol after the police opened the doors. President Trump, who was supposed to be the ringleader of the “insurrection,” told the demonstrators to proceed “peacefully,” and two years of relentless investigations have turned up no evidence, despite breathless media reports to the contrary, that he ever wanted anyone to overthrow the government and install him as some kind of president-for-life.​

​

In the face of a failed post-presidency impeachment attempt and a Jan. 6 committee that recommended that Trump be indicted despite the conspicuous lack of evidence that he did anything for which he should be indicted, the Leftist establishment is not backing off one bit. Instead, Old Joe and his henchmen are doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down, creating a mythology of what happened on Jan. 6, 2021, that resembles a hagiographical narrative more than a sober history.​

​

On Friday, Biden even canonized saints for this new religion, awarding the Presidential Citizens Medal to twelve (twelve, just like the apostles!) people who supposedly held the line against the vicious “insurrectionists.” These twelve, he declared, “embody the best before, during and after January the 6, 2021.” He claimed that “history will remember your names. They’ll remember your courage. They’ll remember your bravery. They’ll remember your extraordinary commitment to your fellow Americans.”​

MSN

www.msn.com

ok

 

[bripat9643]

MSN

www.msn.com

ok

Not going to happen.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Not going to happen.

you don't think so?
LOL

okay

 

[Dante Reawakened]

MSN

www.msn.com

ok

John Anthony Castro, an attorney from Texas and long-shot candidate for president in 2024, filed the lawsuit in federal court on Friday arguing that Trump was constitutionally ineligible to hold office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.


Known as the “Disqualification Clause,” the section prohibits anyone who engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States from holding “any office, civil or military, under the United States.” Castro is arguing that Trump’s involvement in the January 6th insurrection should disqualify him from holding public office again.


“The framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment intended the constitutional provision to be both self-executing and to provide a cause of action,” Castro, who’s representing himself, wrote in the complaint. “More specifically, the Union sought to punish the insurrectionary Confederacy by making their ability to hold public office unconstitutional.”

 

[bripat9643]

John Anthony Castro, an attorney from Texas and long-shot candidate for president in 2024, filed the lawsuit in federal court on Friday arguing that Trump was constitutionally ineligible to hold office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.


Known as the “Disqualification Clause,” the section prohibits anyone who engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States from holding “any office, civil or military, under the United States.” Castro is arguing that Trump’s involvement in the January 6th insurrection should disqualify him from holding public office again.


“The framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment intended the constitutional provision to be both self-executing and to provide a cause of action,” Castro, who’s representing himself, wrote in the complaint. “More specifically, the Union sought to punish the insurrectionary Confederacy by making their ability to hold public office unconstitutional.”

You'll have to convict him of insurrection first. He hasn't even been charged.

This lawsuit only shows how afraid of Trump the Dims are.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

You'll have to convict him of insurrection first. He hasn't even been charged.

This lawsuit only shows how afraid of Trump the Dims are.

wrong
and the suit is not from any Dems

Section 3 prohibits public office holders who have taken an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and then engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or who give aid or comfort to enemies of the United States, from serving in public office.

Trump gave aid and comfort to people convicted of seditious conspiracy - enemies. He's also accused of being part of an insurrection to steal the election. He goes to court, he opens up to discovery.

 

[lantern2814]

Well it was quite literally an insurrection. Don’t know where you’re getting the crying anf stomping part. If that’s what you need to inject in there to feel superior then go right ahead but you just sound over emotional… part of the avalanche

Pathetic attempt to deflect and make it about me rather than your continued tantrum and idiocy asshole. I need inject nothing to be superior to a proven liar like you. There was no insurrection dumbfuck. Nobody charged with that despite it being an actual law with penalties. Pathetic whining and more foot stamping coming from you in 3, 2.....

 

[Lesh]

Pathetic attempt to deflect and make it about me rather than your continued tantrum and idiocy asshole. I need inject nothing to be superior to a proven liar like you. There was no insurrection dumbfuck. Nobody charged with that despite it being an actual law with penalties. Pathetic whining and more foot stamping coming from you in 3, 2.....

Do you see much of a difference between sedition and Insurrection?

Just checking

 

[lantern2814]

I don’t need to. Just need to follow the definition of the word which you seem incapable of doing.

CHAZ in Seattle was an insurrection and I don’t believe involved guns

Oh really liar?

CHOP does have armed guards, but weapons are concealed

While there are armed guards in the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest, or CHOP, organizers say they are not there to intimidate. People may come and go freely.

mynorthwest.com

What are those things those thugs are holding?

 

[lantern2814]

Do you see much of a difference between sedition and Insurrection?

Just checking

They are not the same LUSH. Hence two separate charges carrying different penalties.

 

[Lesh]

They are not the same LUSH. Hence two separate charges carrying different penalties.

Non responsive. Do you see much of a difference between the two


ASSHOLE?

 

[lantern2814]

Non responsive. Do you see much of a difference between the two


ASSHOLE?

That was the correct response LUSH. Are you so stupid you can’t see they are different charges with different penalties?

 

[scruffy]

wrong
and the suit is not from any Dems



Trump gave aid and comfort to people convicted of seditious conspiracy - enemies. He's also accused of being part of an insurrection to steal the election. He goes to court, he opens up to discovery.

The only enemy around here is the pathetic shit for brains libtards who are trying to destroy our country.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

The only enemy around here is the pathetic shit for brains libtards who are trying to destroy our country.

it's their country, not yours

 

[Lesh]

That was the correct response LUSH. Are you so stupid you can’t see they are different charges with different penalties?

Q1: What is “sedition” and “insurrection”?

A1: Generally, sedition is conduct or speech that incites individuals to violently rebel against the authority of the government. Insurrection includes the actual acts of violence and rebellion.

 

[bripat9643]

wrong
and the suit is not from any Dems

Yeah, right.

Trump gave aid and comfort to people convicted of seditious conspiracy - enemies. He's also accused of being part of an insurrection to steal the election. He goes to court, he opens up to discovery.

Accused by imbecile progs doesn't mean jack shit. We all know the seditious conspiracy charge is a load of horseshit.

 

[j-mac]

So their goal was to stop the certification of votes and upend a presidential election?

Not stop, more like delay

 

[Lesh]

We all know the seditious conspiracy charge is a load of horseshit.

Tell it to the juries that convicted those scumbags

 

[Slade3200]

Ridiculous.
There is no way any crowd of unarmed demonstrators could even get near to the legislators, much less forcing it to do or not do anything

Well they quite literally got close to legislators and forced them to stop the certification of votes and evacuate. Hence the insurrection. What is with you illiterate idiots on this board? It’s a simple definition.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong.
CHAZ did have guns, and was NOT an insurrection.
It was a valid reaction against an obviously very racist and illegal, corrupt police force in Seattle.
Remember that police did not even exist to any degree before 1900 or so, and there is no legal basis for any police authority.
It is the police who have been conducting an insurrection over the last century.

Of course it was an insurrection they revolted against the police and inhibated their ability to operate out of that department. That fits the definition of insurrection