Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you were a Taliban leader, would you trust a fuck like Bergdahl?I can understand why obama released bergdahl, he panicked. He was getting hit with the va scandal and a couple other things had popped up. So he quickly put in place this transfer to get bergdahl right around Memorial Day to at least get the military in the fold. So it would seem he was on the military's corner. The rose garden prancing around, sending rice out. He thought he was doing justice and I doubt he even looked at the previous report on bergdahl. I am pretty sure he said "just do it now." Nothing else makes sense and he had no idea it would back fire on him.
He did not think it through, he was reacting to the bad press he was getting, and rushed it right around Memorial Day. Nothing else makes sense. Obama saying that his health was deteriorating and he had to act was a good smoke screen but we all learned that was not true.
I am glad bergdahl came home. I don't wish anybody to be prisoners of those butchers. Now bergdahl will be charged and hopefully punished accordingly, I hope. I think he probably intended to join them.
Only by the wildest stretch of the imagination was he a POW.Isn't the idea supposed to be that we never leave behind a military member? Even if he is going to face criminal charges - it's done under our system.
Where do you get that idea from? Marvel or DC Comics?
We left behind hundreds of defectors and deserters in the Korean and Viet Nam Wars.
A deserter is, by definition, no longer part of the group
Do you leave behind prisoners of war? Isn't that what he was considered even though he eventually faces desertion charges?
And when there is a verdict there will be something to discuss. That certainly wouldn't be "dessert ion"!! Perhaps if the Obama-deeanged loons took a breath.
At least the Army then had the balls to shoot Slovik.Do you leave behind prisoners of war? Isn't that what he was considered even though he eventually faces desertion charges?
You're quibbling.... Everybody knew he deserted. The Liar in Chief gave away the store to get him back NOT because he wanted him back, but because he wants to empty Gitmo.
That would be like trading Erwin Rommel, Alfred Jodl, Heinrich Himmler and von Rundstedt for Eddie Slovik.
I can understand why obama released bergdahl, he panicked. He was getting hit with the va scandal and a couple other things had popped up. So he quickly put in place this transfer to get bergdahl right around Memorial Day to at least get the military in the fold. So it would seem he was on the military's corner. The rose garden prancing around, sending rice out. He thought he was doing justice and I doubt he even looked at the previous report on bergdahl. I am pretty sure he said "just do it now." Nothing else makes sense and he had no idea it would back fire on him.
He did not think it through, he was reacting to the bad press he was getting, and rushed it right around Memorial Day. Nothing else makes sense. Obama saying that his health was deteriorating and he had to act was a good smoke screen but we all learned that was not true.
I am glad bergdahl came home. I don't wish anybody to be prisoners of those butchers. Now bergdahl will be charged and hopefully punished accordingly, I hope. I think he probably intended to join them.
And they did not want his sorry ass.He didn't get caught. He found the group he intended to join.Good stuff. Pussy went AWOL and got caught by the enemy.Military to charge Bergdahl with desertion - CNN.com
Washington (CNN)Military officials are set to charge Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy for leaving his post in Afghanistan before being captured and held captive for five years, according to Bergdahl's attorney and a congressional source.
Hey, Obama - can we have our terrorists back?
Just reward!
He was never a POW.Do you leave behind prisoners of war?
Was he? No. He had already deserted his post and threw himself into the hands of the enemy.
Yes, if you call death "danger".And misbehavior with the enemy. Does that mean traitorous behavior leading to danger to our soldiers from what he gave the enemy?
Deserters are not POW's.You would have left him a prisoner?
He traded a traitorous, deserting collaborator, not a POW.So what else is new? The sad part is the President traded known terrorist POW's for his release substantively resulting in an open season on all non combatants as fodder for trade. So this is what we call hope and change?
Hopefully she takes a dirt nap.*yawn*
alleged to have deserted. that's what trials are for. so maybe we should leave it to people smarter than you are.
You need more sleep....there's overwhelming evidence he deserted and people much smarter than you have testified to that fact. Now go get that nap.
I hope some other Federal prisoner makes it a short life.One thing civilians are not aware of is that when the military brings a charge against someone it's because they have an open and shut case in most instances. During my career I was involved with about a dozen GCM and none of them were aquitted. This guy Bergdahl is going to be facing life if not the death penalty. Misbehavior in the face of the enemy is up there with cowardice in the face of the enemy. Those are death penalty offenses at worst. He'll probably get life.
How was he a POW?I wouldn't think so if he's convicted.No POWs I'm sure.I googled the same link
thank you. it certainly does appear we left them behind, but were any of those soldiers POW's?
wouldn't that make the bergdahl situation different?
i meant, that the other deserters were not POW's. had bergdahl not been a POW, we would not have gone back for him. don't misunderstand me, i find bergdahl's actions reprehensible, however, he was a POW. and if the examples of: well, we left people behind before...are not examples of POW's, then the example is false.
by that i mean, if bergdahl was leaving happy with his muslim wife or whatever, we would never have gone back for him. which is why we didn't go back for those in WWII. the issue with bergdahl is: he was a POW.
america doesn't leave POW's behind. as much as i think he should have been left behind (my opinion alone), america as a nation and as a military policy, does not do that.
If you were a Taliban leader, would you trust a fuck like Bergdahl?I can understand why obama released bergdahl, he panicked. He was getting hit with the va scandal and a couple other things had popped up. So he quickly put in place this transfer to get bergdahl right around Memorial Day to at least get the military in the fold. So it would seem he was on the military's corner. The rose garden prancing around, sending rice out. He thought he was doing justice and I doubt he even looked at the previous report on bergdahl. I am pretty sure he said "just do it now." Nothing else makes sense and he had no idea it would back fire on him.
He did not think it through, he was reacting to the bad press he was getting, and rushed it right around Memorial Day. Nothing else makes sense. Obama saying that his health was deteriorating and he had to act was a good smoke screen but we all learned that was not true.
I am glad bergdahl came home. I don't wish anybody to be prisoners of those butchers. Now bergdahl will be charged and hopefully punished accordingly, I hope. I think he probably intended to join them.
They were sick of his flaky ass, and that is why they traded him for the best deal they could get, a very good deal it turned out.
Otherwise, they would have killed his ass and saved us the trouble of feeding and housing him for the rest of his life.
