Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems the fireworks have started early....
Hillary Clinton backer paid $500G to fund women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct before Election Day, report says
"One of Hillary Clinton’s wealthy pals paid $500,000 in an unsuccessful effort to fund women willing to accuse President Trump of sexual misconduct before the 2016 election, The New York Times reported Sunday."
see - there you go. if ANYONE should DARE to disagree with you, you label them a trump ass kisser and that's that. you don't HAVE to give them credit or believe that maybe, JUST FUCKING MAYBE - *YOU* could be the one wrong.golfing boy is just impossibly intentionally stupid. There are names, dates, quotes and its proven true. You not liking it doesn't make it "fake".Short memories from the Trump lemmings. Do you all not remember him offering 5 million for proof Obama was not born in America?
Proof something exists is NOT making crap up and paying people to lie. Both are stupid yes but paying for proof isn't the same as paying people to lie.
Nobody paid anyone to lie, even the Foxnews article does not say that people were paid to lie. You are making that part up, but as a Trump ass kisser, that is always what you will do.
Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
IF true that their accusations are made up... then why hasn't Trump followed through with is threat to sue?
IF true that their accusations are made up... then why hasn't Trump followed through with is threat to sue?
Right, a President has time to go to court, drag all that security with him, closing down roads, costing taxpayers Lord knows how many millions of dollars, and the MSM and left would just sit back and watch.
OMG What a joke.
yea, it was much better how obama was going to give our wealth away to other countries under fixing GLOBAL WARMING!!!Not as bad as Republicans taking heathcare away from millions of Americans and the morally bankrupt decision to redistribute the wealth of the nation to the top 1%.It seems the fireworks have started early....
Hillary Clinton backer paid $500G to fund women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct before Election Day, report says
"One of Hillary Clinton’s wealthy pals paid $500,000 in an unsuccessful effort to fund women willing to accuse President Trump of sexual misconduct before the 2016 election, The New York Times reported Sunday."
Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
It's the Clintons. No one should be surprised by this. It is what it is.
democrats and liberals.Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
What other people are willing to do to destroy a candidate, or a politician, or anyone for that matter has absolutely nothing to do with the actual guilt or innocence of that person.
democrats and liberals.Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
What other people are willing to do to destroy a candidate, or a politician, or anyone for that matter has absolutely nothing to do with the actual guilt or innocence of that person.
Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
It's the Clintons. No one should be surprised by this. It is what it is.
George Soros put the money up, a felony.
"provided with funds" LMAOThe point is women were paid to make accusations, which in turn makes those accusations suspect.
Greetings fellow retired GySgt. According to the article they were not paid to make the accusations, they were provided with funds after they came forward. Legal bills are expensive and prior to entering the White House Trump had a long history of counter suing people.
The point is women were paid to make accusations, which in turn makes those accusations suspect.
Greetings fellow retired GySgt. According to the article they were not paid to make the accusations, they were provided with funds after they came forward. Legal bills are expensive and prior to entering the White House Trump had a long history of counter suing people.
Well except for the whole fact there were no legal costs cause no one was sued.The point is women were paid to make accusations, which in turn makes those accusations suspect.
Greetings fellow retired GySgt. According to the article they were not paid to make the accusations, they were provided with funds after they came forward. Legal bills are expensive and prior to entering the White House Trump had a long history of counter suing people.
It seems the fireworks have started early....
Hillary Clinton backer paid $500G to fund women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct before Election Day, report says
"One of Hillary Clinton’s wealthy pals paid $500,000 in an unsuccessful effort to fund women willing to accuse President Trump of sexual misconduct before the 2016 election, The New York Times reported Sunday."
Yep, bought them houses and cars to smear him.
This is the Stalinist democrats at work.
SO was the $500K reported as a CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION?
Soros engaged in a felony, does Session have THE BALLS to arrest him, or are only conservative filmmakers subject to campaign finance laws?
Bet MSNBC, Huffington, and CNN will never report it.Days before election mind you, this typical Democrat wanted to usurp the election.
Hillary Clinton backer paid $500G to fund women accusing Trump of sexual misconduct before Election Day, report says
Fake news post. Why do you lie all the time? Is it because your hero you use as an avatar lied all the time?
Just for the record, does anyone happen to know how many of the Trump accusers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to go public?
So no one can confirm that the Trump accusers were in fact PAID substantial amounts of money?
Does mean there's a second lie in the thread title?
As the OP points out some of them refused to come forward with the money. It's just the idea that there were people out there willing to pay others to try and destroy a presidential candidate.
What other people are willing to do to destroy a candidate, or a politician, or anyone for that matter has absolutely nothing to do with the actual guilt or innocence of that person.
