Republican Senators send a letter to Iran. Wow. Damn!

It's a terrible deal which involves lifting sanctions on Iran and allowing them to enrich Uranium. Horrible!
 
I suggest you look up the word taqiyya and what it's usage is in Shia.

Shia is now a "language"?......See folks, we need antie to teach us such things

Lol. Good catch!

Taqqyia is a real term, in Arabic.

It is a very weird principle in Islam, outlined both in the Kuran and in at least 2 volumes of the Hadith, where muslims are allowed to lie in order to acheive their goals, for instance, Jihad.

So, I give Antie credit for at least recognizing a word, in spite of him/her/it not knowing that shia is NOT a language.


:lol:

Never said it was a language, the question stands.....WHAT is the driving religious Beliefs of the Iranian Mullahs?
See if you can keep up, it seems to elude Nat.
 
...Our laws are not made by the United Nations, and any agreement with THEM or IRAN is Not LEGALLY BInding here

I just said the same thing - what is your problem.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:
 
...Our laws are not made by the United Nations, and any agreement with THEM or IRAN is Not LEGALLY BInding here

I just said the same thing - what is your problem.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
 
I just said the same thing - what is your problem.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?
 
Last edited:
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?

"



    • The agreement sees signatories promise to protect Ukraine's borders



    • It was signed by Bill Clinton, John Major, Boris Yeltsin and Leonid Kuchma in 1994



    • Ukrainian parliament has now reached out directly to all the countries who signed the treaty



    • Putin currently has 150,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and it is reported some have crossed into the country



    • President Obama says he is 'deeply concerned' by the news



    • The US and Britain have both made 'crisis calls' to President Putin to warn him to respect territorial boundaries

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570335/Former-British-Ambassador-Moscow-warns-Russia-invaded-Ukraine-difficult-avoid-going-war.html#ixzz3UeyGPU92
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

Always glad to help with your education, now this is an Executive Action...let's see you dance around the fact that Obammy broke this one and expects us to honor the one he is doing ;)


 
Last edited:
...Our laws are not made by the United Nations, and any agreement with THEM or IRAN is Not LEGALLY BInding here

I just said the same thing - what is your problem.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:

Withdrawing from a treaty is not breaking the treaty you incredibly stupid propagandist wannabe.

And the 47 Senators said NOTHING about the US not keeping its word. What they CORRECTLY noted, you lying sack of stupid, is that a future President could undo what Obumbler might do unilaterally, and they also correctly noted that Congress could also undo it.

Good. The shitbirds in Iran might as well know that in advance.

That you lie so loudly and persistently says lots about how desperate you are.
 
Last edited:
At least they are showing that they CARE more about the country than party politics. What do WE get out of a nuclear Iran??? What is the benefit/risk ratio?
They CARE about the leading israel lobby backlash & defense contractor , campaign $$$ oh naive one. :eusa_doh: ChrisL
 
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?

"



    • The agreement sees signatories promise to protect Ukraine's borders



    • It was signed by Bill Clinton, John Major, Boris Yeltsin and Leonid Kuchma in 1994



    • Ukrainian parliament has now reached out directly to all the countries who signed the treaty



    • Putin currently has 150,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and it is reported some have crossed into the country



    • President Obama says he is 'deeply concerned' by the news



    • The US and Britain have both made 'crisis calls' to President Putin to warn him to respect territorial boundaries

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570335/Former-British-Ambassador-Moscow-warns-Russia-invaded-Ukraine-difficult-avoid-going-war.html#ixzz3UeyGPU92
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

Always glad to help with your education, now this is an Executive Action...let's see you dance around the fact that Obammy broke this one and expects us to honor the one he is doing ;)
This is why I don't take lessons from idiots like you. The treaty you mentioned was never approved by the senate. Bush broke a treaty which was.
 
Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?

"



    • The agreement sees signatories promise to protect Ukraine's borders



    • It was signed by Bill Clinton, John Major, Boris Yeltsin and Leonid Kuchma in 1994



    • Ukrainian parliament has now reached out directly to all the countries who signed the treaty



    • Putin currently has 150,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and it is reported some have crossed into the country



    • President Obama says he is 'deeply concerned' by the news



    • The US and Britain have both made 'crisis calls' to President Putin to warn him to respect territorial boundaries

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570335/Former-British-Ambassador-Moscow-warns-Russia-invaded-Ukraine-difficult-avoid-going-war.html#ixzz3UeyGPU92
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

Always glad to help with your education, now this is an Executive Action...let's see you dance around the fact that Obammy broke this one and expects us to honor the one he is doing ;)
This is why I don't take lessons from idiots like you. The treaty you mentioned was never approved by the senate. Bush broke a treaty which was.

The lesson here kid is that Obama is breaking the same type of agreement that he trying to NOW say we must obey....you just aren't up to this kid.
 
I just said the same thing - what is your problem.
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:

Withdrawing from a treaty is not breaking the treaty you incredibly stupid propagandist wannabe.

And the 47 Senators said NOTHING about the US not keeping its word. What they CORRECTLY noted, you lying sack of stupid, si that a future President could undo what Obumbler might do unilaterally, and they also correctly noted that Congress could also undo it.

Good. The shitbirds in Iran might as well know that in advance.

That you lie so loudly and persistently says lots about how desperate you are.
It's not my fault you're a moron who doesn't comprehend the subtle distinction between "abrogate" and "withdraw."

The United States withdrew from the landmark 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty on June 13. Little pageantry or protest marked the U.S. move abrogating the treaty and its prohibition against nationwide missile defenses, despite often fierce debate on the accord within Washington and around the world.
 
You were claiming they are the law...................International laws.............but even in the United Nations if they are not ratified BY OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT, aka THE SENATE, then our country has NEVER OFFICIALLY AGREED TO THESE LAWS......................So WE DON'T HAVE TO HONOR THEM whether the UN likes it our not.

To your other post.............Yes we are part of the UN..........and we have bases all over the world.................and we pay the Lion's Share of their funding..............and we are THEIR POLICE FORCE.....................But we don't have to OBEY THEM as we are still a INDEPENDENT country with individual LAWS and RULES...........and under the Constitution it requires BOTH THE SENATE and THE EXECUTIVE to agree....................

Under the UN and action against Iraq...............We got agreement from Turkey to use their territory to attack from the North.................Their Parlament DISAGREED and we were not allowed to use their land to attack.............Even though their was a POLITICAL AGREEMENT between the Leaders.

Under Clinton.............in Bosnia............we went in under NATO Command...........as we refused to go in under UN Command.................

If an agreement is reached..........without the Senate..........it's NON BINDING.
Technically, we don't have to honor any agreements, even those confirmed by the Senate.

Abiding by one's word has never been a requirement to you lolberals.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:

Withdrawing from a treaty is not breaking the treaty you incredibly stupid propagandist wannabe.

And the 47 Senators said NOTHING about the US not keeping its word. What they CORRECTLY noted, you lying sack of stupid, si that a future President could undo what Obumbler might do unilaterally, and they also correctly noted that Congress could also undo it.

Good. The shitbirds in Iran might as well know that in advance.

That you lie so loudly and persistently says lots about how desperate you are.
It's not my fault you're a moron who doesn't comprehend the subtle distinction between "abrogate" and "withdraw."

The United States withdrew from the landmark 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty on June 13. Little pageantry or protest marked the U.S. move abrogating the treaty and its prohibition against nationwide missile defenses, despite often fierce debate on the accord within Washington and around the world.

You are far too stupid to breath, fauny.

One cannot abrogate a treaty to which one is no longer a party. And one is no longer a party to a treaty after one has withdrawn from it.

Damn, I can't spend all my time trying to educate the educable- mentally retarded asshole shit sucking willful tools like you.
 
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? It's us Liberals, is it? Or is it that you're demented? I say it's the latter since the last president to break a treaty was Bush...

U.S. Withdraws From ABM Treaty

Need more evidence you're nuts? 47 Republican Senators just informed the world that the U.S. doesn't keep it's word.

Damn, you suck at this. :lol:


Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?

"



    • The agreement sees signatories promise to protect Ukraine's borders



    • It was signed by Bill Clinton, John Major, Boris Yeltsin and Leonid Kuchma in 1994



    • Ukrainian parliament has now reached out directly to all the countries who signed the treaty



    • Putin currently has 150,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and it is reported some have crossed into the country



    • President Obama says he is 'deeply concerned' by the news



    • The US and Britain have both made 'crisis calls' to President Putin to warn him to respect territorial boundaries

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570335/Former-British-Ambassador-Moscow-warns-Russia-invaded-Ukraine-difficult-avoid-going-war.html#ixzz3UeyGPU92
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

Always glad to help with your education, now this is an Executive Action...let's see you dance around the fact that Obammy broke this one and expects us to honor the one he is doing ;)
This is why I don't take lessons from idiots like you. The treaty you mentioned was never approved by the senate. Bush broke a treaty which was.

The lesson here kid is that Obama is breaking the same type of agreement that he trying to NOW say we must obey....you just aren't up to this kid.
You're too fucking stupid for words. I point out that any deal can be broken, even treaties approved by the Senate. I then point to Bush as the last example of just such an action ... and you idiotically respond with a non sequitur about an executive deal NOT approved by the Senate.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Sorry, your Boi King broke the treaty we signed with the Ukraine, they gave up weapons when we said we'd protect them.
Oh? What Senate confirmed treaty was that?

"



    • The agreement sees signatories promise to protect Ukraine's borders



    • It was signed by Bill Clinton, John Major, Boris Yeltsin and Leonid Kuchma in 1994



    • Ukrainian parliament has now reached out directly to all the countries who signed the treaty



    • Putin currently has 150,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and it is reported some have crossed into the country



    • President Obama says he is 'deeply concerned' by the news



    • The US and Britain have both made 'crisis calls' to President Putin to warn him to respect territorial boundaries

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570335/Former-British-Ambassador-Moscow-warns-Russia-invaded-Ukraine-difficult-avoid-going-war.html#ixzz3UeyGPU92
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

Always glad to help with your education, now this is an Executive Action...let's see you dance around the fact that Obammy broke this one and expects us to honor the one he is doing ;)
This is why I don't take lessons from idiots like you. The treaty you mentioned was never approved by the senate. Bush broke a treaty which was.

The lesson here kid is that Obama is breaking the same type of agreement that he trying to NOW say we must obey....you just aren't up to this kid.
You're too fucking stupid for words. I point out that any deal can be broken, even treaties approved by the Senate. I then point to Bush as the last example of just such an action ... and you idiotically respond with a non sequitur about an executive deal NOT approved by the Senate.

Typically shallow of you. Utterly unpersuasive claptrap.

Tsk tsk.

The point you attempted to evade was that Obumbler contends that we are somehow obligated to comply with a non treaty executive agreement.

Antares nailed your ass and you are too dishonest to admit or or too fucking tragically stupid to even know it.
 
the Constitution provides an exit from a treaty with Senate majority approval.

Executive agreements bear no such details.

Responsibility of proof ... Treaty of Executive Agreement?

End of conflict.
 
the Constitution provides an exit from a treaty with Senate majority approval.

Executive agreements bear no such details.

Responsibility of proof ... Treaty of Executive Agreement?

End of conflict.

I don't believe that the Constitution addresses the topic of "exiting" from treaties. So, are you making things up or are you just confused again?
 
the Constitution provides an exit from a treaty with Senate majority approval.

Executive agreements bear no such details.

Responsibility of proof ... Treaty of Executive Agreement?

End of conflict.

I don't believe that the Constitution addresses the topic of "exiting" from treaties. So, are you making things up or are you just confused again?
the Constitution provides an exit from a treaty with Senate majority approval.

Executive agreements bear no such details.

Responsibility of proof ... Treaty of Executive Agreement?

End of conflict.

I don't believe that the Constitution addresses the topic of "exiting" from treaties. So, are you making things up or are you just confused again?


then you should exit the thread on grounds of ignorance.
 

Forum List

Back
Top