🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Republicans: admit you are afraid of Bernie Sanders

He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

I would be terrified of him if he had even a remote chance of winning. As it stands it's stupid to even talk about him...that's how irrelevant he is.
29,000 people at a rally is not irrelevant. Not only that, bur in terms of direct donations, he has raised more in fundraising than any other republican candidate.


Hey...more power to him. Honestly.

btw... 29,000 people can fit into one of the men's rooms at Yankee Stadium.

.
Um yes it is true, but as I noted in the OP to get that many people this EARLY in a campaign is unprecedented. Either way, he is still drawing bigger crowds than Hillary or Trump.
 
He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

I would be terrified of him if he had even a remote chance of winning. As it stands it's stupid to even talk about him...that's how irrelevant he is.
29,000 people at a rally is not irrelevant. Not only that, bur in terms of direct donations, he has raised more in fundraising than any other republican candidate.

So what? Farrakhan has a lot of people attending his speeches too. And he has the same chance as Bernie of being POTUS.
Um yeah but the crowds he is drawing are higher than ANY other candidate.

Maybe we should get him a trophy. Now, do you think that he has even a iceberg's chance in hell of winning the democratic nomination? If your answer is yes you are either delusional or you're just playing games right now.
 
"Republicans: admit you are afraid of Bernie Sanders"

They need to first admit they're afraid of most everything else: change, diversity, inclusion, dissent, and expressions of individual liberty – to name just a few.
 
He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

I would be terrified of him if he had even a remote chance of winning. As it stands it's stupid to even talk about him...that's how irrelevant he is.
29,000 people at a rally is not irrelevant. Not only that, bur in terms of direct donations, he has raised more in fundraising than any other republican candidate.

So what? Farrakhan has a lot of people attending his speeches too. And he has the same chance as Bernie of being POTUS.
Um yeah but the crowds he is drawing are higher than ANY other candidate.
Maybe we should get him a trophy. Now, do you think that he has even a iceberg's chance in hell of winning the democratic nomination? If your answer is yes you are either delusional or you're just playing games right now.
Yes, I think he does. Am I convinced he will? No not at all, but he sure as hell isn't irrelevant.
 
"Republicans: admit you are afraid of Bernie Sanders"

They need to first admit they're afraid of most everything else: change, diversity, inclusion, dissent, and expressions of individual liberty – to name just a few.
I think just like Greeks who are demanding the rich start paying their fair share Americans will like to hear what Bernie has to say.

The establishment will throw biden gore and hillary at him.
 
"Republicans: admit you are afraid of Bernie Sanders"

They need to first admit they're afraid of most everything else: change, diversity, inclusion, dissent, and expressions of individual liberty – to name just a few.

While we are on this subject. The left plays this game of coercing people into inclusiveness in the same way a cult does. They are not content with letting people be as inclusive as they want. Call it freedom of choice but Perhaps people don't want to be diverse as much as you think they should. This is a huge problem for you which means you have to use whatever means of coercion you have at your disposal to get people to conform to your standard. Welcome to the birth of government programs to make us more inclusive. A constant stream of political advertisement stressing diversity on college campuses. The list goes on.

The Left seems to be echoing the ideals of individual expression but while they are doing that they are purging the confederate flag wherever they see it. There seems to be a contradiction.
 
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.
 
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.
Well you could always dispute them if they aren't actually facts but you and I both know you can't.
 
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.
Well you could always dispute them if they aren't actually facts but you and I both know you can't.

That's classic. So you call me a right winger, then say I can't dispute the right wingers suck, which of course I can't because I'm not a right winger. Yes Holmes, they suck. And you can't even keep your own insults straight, moron.

So do the Democrats, that's why I'm laughing at you. You say that stuff about the right wingers, and you are blind to the flagrant hypocrisy.
 
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.
You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.
Well you could always dispute them if they aren't actually facts but you and I both know you can't.

That's classic. So you call me a right winger, then say I can't dispute the right wingers suck, which of course I can't because I'm not a right winger. Yes Holmes, they suck. And you can't even keep your own insults straight, moron.

So do the Democrats, that's why I'm laughing at you. You say that stuff about the right wingers, and you are blind to the flagrant hypocrisy.
Huh? Did you even read this before posting it?
 
he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

The United States is the wealthiest country in the world, with more billionaires people per capita than any other nation in the WORLD. If they were truly the ones who create good jobs, America would not look like THIS, with more than 4 out of 10 people living in poverty. That's as bad as communist China and Putin's post-communist Russia!



worldpoverty-png.48050


Enough is enough!

-- Paravani
so b/c we have rich people, you want to tax, just them, b/c you think that idea will work, this time.
 
anyone not a full leftist with any love for America should fear bern.

his hate for freedom and capitalism and just plain ol' being an America is very clear.

He wants to use the same policies that have led to the ruin of every leftist country that tries them. The only countries still holding on are in the EU, but it's only a matter of time before Germany gets tired of being the Bank of Greece, or can't do it anymore, and the eu falls.

but hey, it'll work in America, this time for realz
Nothing Sanders supports has anything to do with ending capitalism. Maybe you should try reading up on his actual policies.
He is a socialist you fucking idiot that is the opposite of capitalism.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
not always, look at the oil rich countries. people forget the broad spectrum of definition for that word...

presente moi... Socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
good lord...

Yes, as long as you don't run out of other peoples money, socialism works.

small, oil rich countries can stick it to the oil companies and still function, when the wells dry up, they are totally fucked.


Can you point out a single first world nation that doesn't pave their own roads with tax dollars, have science institutions and think education is important? Also, I am sure the oil-companies enjoy the police, roads and stability our government grants them.
what does the same stewpud shit you spam in every single fucking thread, have to do with what I posted?

What part of $18Trillion is debt is to much more you?
 
he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

The United States is the wealthiest country in the world, with more billionaires people per capita than any other nation in the WORLD. If they were truly the ones who create good jobs, America would not look like THIS, with more than 4 out of 10 people living in poverty. That's as bad as communist China and Putin's post-communist Russia!



worldpoverty-png.48050


Enough is enough!

-- Paravani


Yet, they have the fucking nerve to outsource and bring in hundreds of thousands of h1b's. Look at Europe with its 30,000-80,000 per capita/year for its population. Europe has better roads, has top rated science institutions and has better educational systems. It works very well...

I am not saying that America isn't respectable but we could do a hell of a lot better.

The rich have sold America down the river for foreign workers and this is why our middle class has died.
nafta was signed by clintong, but you know this, so plz stop lying about it.
did you know there's a Fed rule that forces states to take the lowest bid on roads? probably not
did you know states are not allowed to demand a guarantee of the work?
our education system started slipping when government took over.
 
I said he hates capitalism

and his policies will destroy America just like it's destroyed every other country.

but you will vote for him anyway, b/c like the sheep you are, you think the bad shit that happens everyfuckinggoddamntime wont happen here.

it's ignorant people like you that have taken us down this road.
Why would you think he hates capitalism? His policies and speeches do not reflect such a thing. What policies exactly do you think would destroy America? Be specific.
he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.
you think bern will stop cronyism?

:lmao:

I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.
I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.
 
Why would you think he hates capitalism? His policies and speeches do not reflect such a thing. What policies exactly do you think would destroy America? Be specific.
he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.
you think bern will stop cronyism?

:lmao:

I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.
These people lack the critical thinking skills to see any nuance in political issues. You are either a communist or a rightwing nut job - there is no middle ground in their eyes.
you can't understand history and still support an overt socialist.

so yea, you are a socialist
 
You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.
You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?
Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.
Well you could always dispute them if they aren't actually facts but you and I both know you can't.

That's classic. So you call me a right winger, then say I can't dispute the right wingers suck, which of course I can't because I'm not a right winger. Yes Holmes, they suck. And you can't even keep your own insults straight, moron.

So do the Democrats, that's why I'm laughing at you. You say that stuff about the right wingers, and you are blind to the flagrant hypocrisy.
Huh? Did you even read this before posting it?

Self awareness is just not part of your world
 
So has Fascism.

Right. Another ultra left wing government in charge failure
LOL, you really are ignorant of politics.

Wait. You think Fascism is about limited government, individual liberties and rights?

LOL
fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/
noun
  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
    synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy;More

    fascism definition - Google Search
    • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
Facism coined from the Latin meavinf bundle of sticks used by SOCIALIST Benito Mussolini . That is the real meaning of the socialist offshoot. As normal history proves you wrong and once again shows that most dictionaries are now ideologically driven

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

About | Oxford English Dictionary

A good read by the way is The Professor and the Madman, A tale of Murder, Insanity and the making of the Oxford English Dictionary, by Simon Winchester.
 
Why would you think he hates capitalism? His policies and speeches do not reflect such a thing. What policies exactly do you think would destroy America? Be specific.
he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.
you think bern will stop cronyism?

:lmao:

I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.
I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.
 

Forum List

Back
Top