Republicans: admit you are afraid of Bernie Sanders

[kaz]

he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

 

[Wry Catcher]

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

 

[kaz]

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

Making up quotes I didn't say, endlessly telling us how we feel, yes, you are a rhetorical genius

 

[Wry Catcher]

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

Making up quotes I didn't say, endlessly telling us how we feel, yes, you are a rhetorical genius

Are you suggesting I was quoting you ("ain't if awful" and "you too") and you once wrote these phrases? Are you really that dumb, or too biased to read and comprehend?

Read this s l o w l y, "I see (your) contributions are limited to".

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Sanders has grand plans but can't explain how he will pay for the grand plans.

 

[kaz]

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

Making up quotes I didn't say, endlessly telling us how we feel, yes, you are a rhetorical genius

Are you suggesting I was quoting you ("ain't if awful" and "you too") and you once wrote these phrases? Are you really that dumb, or too biased to read and comprehend?

Read this s l o w l y, "I see (your) contributions are limited to".

When you use quote marks, that means you are quoting my words. You don't use quote marks when you are paraphrasing what you think I say. You said and just repeated that you don't know that school grade subject of how to quote while you called me "that dumb." Classic. Note I used quote marks because they were your words, idiot

 

[Wry Catcher]

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

Making up quotes I didn't say, endlessly telling us how we feel, yes, you are a rhetorical genius

Are you suggesting I was quoting you ("ain't if awful" and "you too") and you once wrote these phrases? Are you really that dumb, or too biased to read and comprehend?

Read this s l o w l y, "I see (your) contributions are limited to".

When you use quote marks, that means you are quoting my words. You don't use quote marks when you are paraphrasing what you think I say. You said and just repeated that you don't know that school grade subject of how to quote while you called me "that dumb." Classic. Note I used quote marks because they were your words, idiot

I could have used italics, that's true. I have in the past and others have been as captious as you in pointing a minor grammatical error. Both phrases are generic, easily understood by most but single quotes were a better option.

To the point, prove you are not a curmudgeon and prove you do not regularly whine and claim in other words, 'ain't' (fill in the blank) 'awful', and liberally use the logical fallacy tu quoque.

 

[mgh80]

He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

Having the largest crowds show up early in the campaign =/= you're likely to win. If that were the case Ron Paul would have won the nomination for the GOP.

 

[Redfish]

He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

No one is afraid of Sanders except the DNC. He is bat shit crazy.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Fascism is left wing along with Socialism, Communism and Totalitarianism; they are all maximum government control and minimal individual liberty

 

[CrusaderFrank]

he wants to increase taxes on the wealthy, the people that create jobs.
he wants to use tax dollars to pay for more stuff

that answers both questions.

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

^ LOL @ the guy who calls everyone "Stupid" deriding someone for "Name calling"

We should charge admission

 

[SwimExpert]

I'm afraid of Bernie Sanders. Very afraid. What a catastrophe for President he would be.

 

[kaz]

You are obsessed with how people feel, aren't you, gay boy?

I'm not obsessed, people watching is part of the enjoyment of posting on this sight. I call 'em as I see 'em; in your case, I see a curmudgeon whose contributions are limited to "ain't it awful" and "you too". Not much of a resume, is it?

Making up quotes I didn't say, endlessly telling us how we feel, yes, you are a rhetorical genius

Are you suggesting I was quoting you ("ain't if awful" and "you too") and you once wrote these phrases? Are you really that dumb, or too biased to read and comprehend?

Read this s l o w l y, "I see (your) contributions are limited to".

When you use quote marks, that means you are quoting my words. You don't use quote marks when you are paraphrasing what you think I say. You said and just repeated that you don't know that school grade subject of how to quote while you called me "that dumb." Classic. Note I used quote marks because they were your words, idiot

I could have used italics, that's true. I have in the past and others have been as captious as you in pointing a minor grammatical error. Both phrases are generic, easily understood by most but single quotes were a better option.

To the point, prove you are not a curmudgeon and prove you do not regularly whine and claim in other words, 'ain't' (fill in the blank) 'awful', and liberally use the logical fallacy tu quoque.

Using quote marks claiming those were my exact words is a "minor grammatical error?" If you had paid attention in grade school, it's one you would not have made.

9/11 was a minor law enforcement incident to you too, wasn't it?

 

[BluesLegend]

You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?

Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

You're welcome to explain why I am wrong. This is a forum after all. We express opinions with facts here.

You mean like all the "facts" in your OP post, Holmes?

Yes, Kaz, those are facts. I know as a rightwinger you barely know what they look like but there they are.

Ouch, rightwinger. Quite the quip, you drew blood sir, nicely played. Wow, that one stung. Your intellectual repartee is stunning.

This word you keep using, "fact," I do not think it means what you think it means. LOL. Sure, Holmes, republicans are drama queens, just facts from you.

Well you could always dispute them if they aren't actually facts but you and I both know you can't.

Dispute nonsense? Seems kind of a waste of time it disputes itself.

 

[auditor0007]

He is drawing in more crowds than any candidate on both sides of the aisle. 29,000 in Portand is his highest number so far. That kind of rally support is unprecedented this early in campaign season. The reason why he hasn't surpassed Hillary in the polls is because he is not as well known as she is across the U.S. He lacks her name recognition. That will soon change of course. Oh, and unlike Trump, he didn't have to hire people to come to his early rallies. Let's also not forget that Sanders is proposing actual policy ideas unlike Trump. Apparently all a republican has to do to win in the polls is be a total drama queen.

Polls already show that most Americans favor a wide range of progressive issues. In fact, most of what Sanders is running on, most Americans already support. As this race goes on, don't you think he poses a huge threat to republicans?

Trump vs Bernie? I would vote third party, and I am almost completely against doing such a thing. If Americans got it that screwed up to nominate those two, then I give up on any hope for this country.

 

[SAYIT]

The usual leftist big-govt-fanatic delusion: If the government doesn't provide those things, nobody will provide those things. (The fanatics are so obsessed with government-uber-alles, they can't imagine anybody living without it. All things must come from government)..

They seem convinced that all good flows from gov't spending and all evil from the private sector. They know nothing of what it takes to build and maintain a company and turn a blind eye to gov't extravagance, incompetence and waste.

 

[SAYIT]

Dems realize that supporting a Socialist actually makes them a Socialist Party

Which is why a fiscal conservative like me not only doesn't fear Uncle Bernie but actually appreciates him. His candidacy has pulled America's socialists out of the woodwork and exposed the Dems rotted underbelly and it may force all Dem candidates to tack hard left to combat him. In all ways the Trump/Sanders circus will make this the most entertaining primary election pre-season in my lifetime.

 

[Wry Catcher]

That's not an answer, it's an echo of Limbaugh. Sen. Sanders is speaking to the Silent Majority, the vast number of American working men and women who see the inequity of crony capitalism.

The wealthy don't use their wealth to create jobs, for the most part new jobs are created by consumer demand or technological advances. Great wealth is created by using other peoples money, those people Jesus tossed out of the temple.

Sanders has brought OWS out of the street and into the debate. Banks and bankers are usurers, using our money and paying us interests rates less than 1%, and loaning our money at exorbitant rates of interest.

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

^ LOL @ the guy who calls everyone "Stupid" deriding someone for "Name calling"

We should charge admission

I reserve calling stupid only those, like you and Stephanie, stupid. It's apt, thought I know it's not nice. The truth hurts.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

you think bern will stop cronyism?



I'm sorry to tell you, but he won't b/c his party is chin deep in it.


and I don't listen to rush, I can see what happens and admit the truth, you're just an idiot that thinks socialism will work, this time, and will be shocked when it doesn't

Calling me an idiot is not a rebuttal; doing so is a common practice of those who lack the ability and intelligence to offer a credible counterpoint.

You may not listen to Limbaugh, but you are parroting right wing propaganda, and the meme that anyone who criticizes the financial services industry must be a closet commie.

I didn't call you a commie, I called you an idiot for thinking socialism will work.

considering how many socialist countries are hellholes or are falling apart, you have to be an idiot to want to try it here.

My option to idiot is you hate America.

take your pick and own it.

The evidence supplied by your posts suggests you're a very angry and ignorant person, likely one whose emotions have been riled by accepting the memes of media propagandists as absolute truths.

Name calling is your game, substance and evidence lacks in everything you post.

Your use of the term Socialism and Socialist is a dead giveaway; you have no background in economic theory or any understanding of reality. These words are great for stirring emotions, but in the pragmatic world emotional analysis - if one could so characterize it - leads not to understanding but to hysteria.

^ LOL @ the guy who calls everyone "Stupid" deriding someone for "Name calling"

We should charge admission

I reserve calling stupid only those, like you and Stephanie, stupid. It's apt, thought I know it's not nice. The truth hurts.

Sure, Freddy. Sure

 

[MarathonMike]

I think that a Trump-Sanders election would be awesome if for no other reason than to show that American politics isn't just about the Bush-Clinton power families.