Republicans in Panic?

[The Rabbi]

who cares what the "establishment" is "worried" about?
american patriots are tired of the same old okey doke career politicians. The country will survive just fine if either or both parties collapse..in fact it would be an improvement.

well, the "establishment" IS the party. the teatards are the interlopers who should probably start their own party instead of being a minority that is hijacking what used to be a great party.

the only thing that is going to collapse are GOP chances to win national elections.

so keep it up.

Remind me how you supported the candidates of that great party, McCain, Bush, and Romney.
Total poseur fool.

 

[Correll]

Seriously

There is no way anyone with a degree of intelligence could support Trump
There is also no way anyone who rejects bigotry could support Trumps antics

Trump's supporters are less educated than the average Republican voter.

http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/10/10-02-2015-2016-release1.pdf

But ...

He's speaking to the anxieties of the white, working middle-class. He's speaking to the Reagan Democrats. He's speaking to social conservatives who have not seen an economic advancement for the past two generations. And it's resonating.

True, and have NOT been brainwashed in the college indoctrination process.

 

[MisterBeale]

Maybe you're not embarrassed; Trump and Carson leading in the polls for the Nomination for POTUS should embarrass all Americans, for such polling data reflects poorly on all of us.

Another denizen of the LWNJ echo chamber chimes in with inane talking points.....

you know, dear... i'm a lot of things. but a nutjob isn't one of them. in my view, you're wrong on almost every issue. and until the GOP dumps its loons on the right, no one like me (who DID vote for republican mayors and governors in the past) is going to ever vote for one of your candidates.

Sorry Jillian, but when you call everyone who supports Trump an uneducated bigot- you are a nut job.

I was wrong about Obama, but I was right about the Senate, the House and all of the state houses that Obama has handed the GOP. He has been a blessing in that regard.

There is no other explanation for supporting Trump other than being an uneducated bigot. Trump depends on both

Why are you being such a partisan jerk?

Did you know? I read this thread the whole way through, and Jillian was asked with two, three, or four times, I lost track b/c it was quite a few, to just point out HOW Trump is a bigot.

She never responded to that. Seriously. I was kind of waiting for that.



Personally, I'm NOT a Trump supporter. But then again, I don't support any other candidate either. I don't see that any other candidate is any better.

All of these Trump detractors level all sorts of criticism against him, but rarely back them up. It puzzles me, it really does.

Things like he is not qualified to be president, or he is amateur, or etc.


HOW? EXAMPLES?

 

[Ravi]

You can't get the SC to rule a constitutional amendment void. You'd have to amend the constitution.

Why? the SC created the right to abortion and gay marriage out of thin fucking air, what's to stop them from saying RKBA isn't really what the 2nd amendment was about?

You idiots opened this pandora's box where the SC basically has free reign to fuck with people, get ready to eat it.

Fucktard.

Are you taking idiot pills or something? The SC did NOT create gay marriage or the right to abortion. Those are inherent rights. THE USA cannot take away and inherent right without a compelling reason. There is NO compelling reason to say two same sex people can't get married, nor is there a compelling reason to say the government has the right over a woman's body.

The 2nd is an enumerated right. The only way to overturn it is a constitutional amendment.

Baby.

Right. . . . right. Those we all know now that the SC didn't invent those right, they were always in the constitution.

They were just written in the special invisible ink that you can only read with those special supreme court glasses they give you when you are sworn in. But yeah, we know those rights are inherent and have always been in the constitution. Of course. Absolutely, cut and dried, no interpretation.

(You just need those special glasses to read that invisible ink. But it's there, I sweat it. It has always been there, from the start.)

Another person that can't comprehend what he reads.

I guess I am just one of millions. Since the founding of the nation, homosexuality has been illegal, hasn't it? So has murder, right?

So how on earth could any one read into the constitution such a right? Obviously you have no idea what the founders intent was.

YOU are the one that can't comprehend what he reads. derp derp derp. . . .

There have been laws since the beginning of the US outlawing homosexuality. But none of them were constitutional.

 

[Correll]

Another denizen of the LWNJ echo chamber chimes in with inane talking points.....

you know, dear... i'm a lot of things. but a nutjob isn't one of them. in my view, you're wrong on almost every issue. and until the GOP dumps its loons on the right, no one like me (who DID vote for republican mayors and governors in the past) is going to ever vote for one of your candidates.

Sorry Jillian, but when you call everyone who supports Trump an uneducated bigot- you are a nut job.

I was wrong about Obama, but I was right about the Senate, the House and all of the state houses that Obama has handed the GOP. He has been a blessing in that regard.

There is no other explanation for supporting Trump other than being an uneducated bigot. Trump depends on both

Why are you being such a partisan jerk?

Did you know? I read this thread the whole way through, and Jillian was asked with two, three, or four times, I lost track b/c it was quite a few, to just point out HOW Trump is a bigot.

She never responded to that. Seriously. I was kind of waiting for that.



Personally, I'm NOT a Trump supporter. But then again, I don't support any other candidate either. I don't see that any other candidate is any better.

All of these Trump detractors level all sorts of criticism against him, but rarely back them up. It puzzles me, it really does.

Things like he is not qualified to be president, or he is amateur, or etc.


HOW? EXAMPLES?

I know.

IF I slam some lib leader like Obama or Hillary and you ask me for examples, I'd be happy to trot them out.

I mean, discussing what is wrong with my partisan enemies, who doesn't like doing that?

But these libs, it's like they just want to fill the bandwith with negative filler and create the illusion that their claims are true by repetition.

It's a form of propaganda.

Extremely dishonest and poisonous, but, hey, that doesn't seem to be an issue for libs.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

When is Obama going to take your guns?????????????????? It's almost been 8 years and it hasn't happened.

we aren't talking about taking anyone's guns, though...Why are you trying to change the subject again?

I was commenting on little Marty's post claiming Hillary is going to take your guns. Same shit you all whined about with Obama. Get some new material or continue to flail.

If Hillary appoints a SC judge that reduces the 2nd amendment, you don't think several States will jump to ban weapons outright?

and here's a hint twat, saying I can't get a certain firearm, but allowing "grandfathered" weapons in, is the same as taking the gun out of my hands.

Asshole.

My goodness you are touchy. Continue your whining, it's tasty.

Anger in the face of tyranny is never wrong, and tyranny is what you idiots support.

There is no tyranny. You have butthurt. Big difference.

 

[MisterBeale]

Why? the SC created the right to abortion and gay marriage out of thin fucking air, what's to stop them from saying RKBA isn't really what the 2nd amendment was about?

You idiots opened this pandora's box where the SC basically has free reign to fuck with people, get ready to eat it.

Fucktard.

Are you taking idiot pills or something? The SC did NOT create gay marriage or the right to abortion. Those are inherent rights. THE USA cannot take away and inherent right without a compelling reason. There is NO compelling reason to say two same sex people can't get married, nor is there a compelling reason to say the government has the right over a woman's body.

The 2nd is an enumerated right. The only way to overturn it is a constitutional amendment.

Baby.

Right. . . . right. Those we all know now that the SC didn't invent those right, they were always in the constitution.

They were just written in the special invisible ink that you can only read with those special supreme court glasses they give you when you are sworn in. But yeah, we know those rights are inherent and have always been in the constitution. Of course. Absolutely, cut and dried, no interpretation.

(You just need those special glasses to read that invisible ink. But it's there, I sweat it. It has always been there, from the start.)

Another person that can't comprehend what he reads.

I guess I am just one of millions. Since the founding of the nation, homosexuality has been illegal, hasn't it? So has murder, right?

So how on earth could any one read into the constitution such a right? Obviously you have no idea what the founders intent was.

YOU are the one that can't comprehend what he reads. derp derp derp. . . .

There have been laws since the beginning of the US outlawing homosexuality. But none of them were constitutional.

. . . and next you're going to tell us that slavery was unconstitutional since the very beginning to. . . .

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe you're not embarrassed; Trump and Carson leading in the polls for the Nomination for POTUS should embarrass all Americans, for such polling data reflects poorly on all of us.

Another denizen of the LWNJ echo chamber chimes in with inane talking points.....

you know, dear... i'm a lot of things. but a nutjob isn't one of them. in my view, you're wrong on almost every issue. and until the GOP dumps its loons on the right, no one like me (who DID vote for republican mayors and governors in the past) is going to ever vote for one of your candidates.

Sorry Jillian, but when you call everyone who supports Trump an uneducated bigot- you are a nut job.

I was wrong about Obama, but I was right about the Senate, the House and all of the state houses that Obama has handed the GOP. He has been a blessing in that regard.

There is no other explanation for supporting Trump other than being an uneducated bigot. Trump depends on both

Why are you being such a partisan jerk?

No partisanship in identifying a bigotted demagogue capable of manipulating the hatreds and insecurity of low information republican voters

 

[NLT]

seems the party is concerned that the "base" is taking over the asylum

Time for GOP panic? Establishment worried Carson or Trump might win.

The washington Post?

 

[Ravi]

Are you taking idiot pills or something? The SC did NOT create gay marriage or the right to abortion. Those are inherent rights. THE USA cannot take away and inherent right without a compelling reason. There is NO compelling reason to say two same sex people can't get married, nor is there a compelling reason to say the government has the right over a woman's body.

The 2nd is an enumerated right. The only way to overturn it is a constitutional amendment.

Baby.

Right. . . . right. Those we all know now that the SC didn't invent those right, they were always in the constitution.

They were just written in the special invisible ink that you can only read with those special supreme court glasses they give you when you are sworn in. But yeah, we know those rights are inherent and have always been in the constitution. Of course. Absolutely, cut and dried, no interpretation.

(You just need those special glasses to read that invisible ink. But it's there, I sweat it. It has always been there, from the start.)

Another person that can't comprehend what he reads.

I guess I am just one of millions. Since the founding of the nation, homosexuality has been illegal, hasn't it? So has murder, right?

So how on earth could any one read into the constitution such a right? Obviously you have no idea what the founders intent was.

YOU are the one that can't comprehend what he reads. derp derp derp. . . .

There have been laws since the beginning of the US outlawing homosexuality. But none of them were constitutional.

. . . and next you're going to tell us that slavery was unconstitutional since the very beginning to. . . .

It was.

 

[Correll]

Another denizen of the LWNJ echo chamber chimes in with inane talking points.....

you know, dear... i'm a lot of things. but a nutjob isn't one of them. in my view, you're wrong on almost every issue. and until the GOP dumps its loons on the right, no one like me (who DID vote for republican mayors and governors in the past) is going to ever vote for one of your candidates.

Sorry Jillian, but when you call everyone who supports Trump an uneducated bigot- you are a nut job.

I was wrong about Obama, but I was right about the Senate, the House and all of the state houses that Obama has handed the GOP. He has been a blessing in that regard.

There is no other explanation for supporting Trump other than being an uneducated bigot. Trump depends on both

Why are you being such a partisan jerk?

No partisanship in identifying a bigotted demagogue capable of manipulating the hatreds and insecurity of low information republican voters

Pointing out that our current Trade and Immigration policies are not in the best interests of American voters is not appealing to their prejudices but to their valid interests.

You know that our Trade and Immigration polices are not in the best interests of the American voters, that is why you are running away from my question on how you think Whites will react to being permanently disenfranchised.

You are personally attacking Trump because you don't want a serious and honest discussion of these issues.

 

[Valerie]

in what way will whites supposedly be permanently disenfranchised exactly..???

my question on how you think Whites will react to being permanently disenfranchised

^

 

[Hutch Starskey]

you know, dear... i'm a lot of things. but a nutjob isn't one of them. in my view, you're wrong on almost every issue. and until the GOP dumps its loons on the right, no one like me (who DID vote for republican mayors and governors in the past) is going to ever vote for one of your candidates.

Sorry Jillian, but when you call everyone who supports Trump an uneducated bigot- you are a nut job.

I was wrong about Obama, but I was right about the Senate, the House and all of the state houses that Obama has handed the GOP. He has been a blessing in that regard.

There is no other explanation for supporting Trump other than being an uneducated bigot. Trump depends on both

Another LWNJ chimes in on cue.......

Seriously

There is no way anyone with a degree of intelligence could support Trump
There is also no way anyone who rejects bigotry could support Trumps antics

Falling for leftwing propaganda isn't an indication of intelligence.

Falling for Calling it leftwing propaganda isn't an indication of intelligence.

 

[martybegan]

Do you think Hillary would appoint a SC justice who supports RKBA?

and considering I cannot get a CCW in NYC without proving to the NYPD I have a reason for one, my gun has already been taken.

You can't get the SC to rule a constitutional amendment void. You'd have to amend the constitution.

Why? the SC created the right to abortion and gay marriage out of thin fucking air, what's to stop them from saying RKBA isn't really what the 2nd amendment was about?

You idiots opened this pandora's box where the SC basically has free reign to fuck with people, get ready to eat it.

Fucktard.

Are you taking idiot pills or something? The SC did NOT create gay marriage or the right to abortion. Those are inherent rights. THE USA cannot take away and inherent right without a compelling reason. There is NO compelling reason to say two same sex people can't get married, nor is there a compelling reason to say the government has the right over a woman's body.

The 2nd is an enumerated right. The only way to overturn it is a constitutional amendment.

Baby.

there is no "inherent right" to an abortion, I do not see it espoused in any texts, of any revolutions that had the goal of a free society. It's made up, flim flam, the imaginations of 5 of 9 unelected lawyers.

Gay marriage is another made up right, purely because 5 of 9 unelected lawyers decided to speed things up and overrrule the will of the people of several states.

and as for your last statement, I simply don't trust YOU or the government to stick to that view.

You idiots change your views on things faster than a cat in a small pet store changes his appetite.

the 2d applies to WELL-REGULATED MILITIA to defend the country (since there was no standing army at the time) and every justice until scalia knew that. but heller is what it is.... as stupid a decision as it is.

and I don't trust wingers with my rights. it's really simple. I guess it just depends on what your priorities are. of course, the difference is that no one has outlawed guns or tried to (since regulation is STILL ok even scalia said so in heller). yet, your guys routinely try to take away others' rights

The FIRST part gives the States the right to form militias. It was to prevent the federal government from claiming exclusive right to armed force. The SECOND part gives the PEOPLE the right to keep and bear arms.

It's your side that uses the courts to crush others, not us.

 

[martybegan]

who cares what the "establishment" is "worried" about?
american patriots are tired of the same old okey doke career politicians. The country will survive just fine if either or both parties collapse..in fact it would be an improvement.

well, the "establishment" IS the party. the teatards are the interlopers who should probably start their own party instead of being a minority that is hijacking what used to be a great party.

the only thing that is going to collapse are GOP chances to win national elections.

so keep it up.

And yet they keep winning more and more at the State level.... Why is that?

Turnout

Weak.

 

[Correll]

in what way will whites supposedly be permanently disenfranchised exactly..???

my question on how you think Whites will react to being permanently disenfranchised

^

RW goes on about it all the time. He likes to focus on the fact that demographics are likely to lead to the GOP being marginalized.

BUT, the GOP always wins the White Vote. It always represents the majority of the WHite vote and it's agenda and interests.


If the GOP is marginalized, then so is the majority of it's White Voters.

They will never again have their agenda or interests represented in national policy.

 

[Valerie]

"the WHite vote and it's agenda and interests."


and what's that agenda, exactly..?

 

[Ravi]

in what way will whites supposedly be permanently disenfranchised exactly..???

my question on how you think Whites will react to being permanently disenfranchised

^

RW goes on about it all the time. He likes to focus on the fact that demographics are likely to lead to the GOP being marginalized.

BUT, the GOP always wins the White Vote. It always represents the majority of the WHite vote and it's agenda and interests.


If the GOP is marginalized, then so is the majority of it's White Voters.

They will never again have their agenda or interests represented in national policy.

Thanks for proving once and for all that the GOP is the party of white people only.

 

[martybegan]

They should worry. We won't stand for their fake conservatism any longer.

Again, what happens happens. If Hillary wins we get closer to the 2nd amendment being voided by the SC (and what a reaction THAT is going to be). If Trump wins we get ????????. Either way be ready for interesting times.

When is Obama going to take your guns?????????????????? It's almost been 8 years and it hasn't happened.

Do you think Hillary would appoint a SC justice who supports RKBA?

and considering I cannot get a CCW in NYC without proving to the NYPD I have a reason for one, my gun has already been taken.

You can't get the SC to rule a constitutional amendment void. You'd have to amend the constitution.

Wow it's just embarrassing to see an American who actually believes that the supreme court can void a constitutional amendment.

Where do these extremely stupid people come from?

Oh, Rly????

Forgot about this little gem of a decision....

Plessy v. Ferguson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Correll]

Calling if funny valerie is not much of a rebuttal.

What part am I wrong about?

"the WHite vote and it's agenda and interests."


and what's that agenda, exactly..?

It is varied and constantly changing.

NOT being discriminated against is a fairly stable one.