Republicans love to claim they're "pro-family." Do they support any of these "socialist" pro-family policies?

Of course you don't.....Economic illiteracy is a prerequisite to being a State worshiper.

I imagine if I asked you to explain it, it would be about the same as my asking you to explain your daycare ideas.
 
Most of the hyper-rich are on your team, Corky.

When are Gates, Buffett, Bezos, Hollywood drips, zillionaire jocks, et.al. going to get off their asses and do something about any of it?

A. It's not their jobs to do ANYTHING about any of it. That's what your taxes are for. But Republicans have stopped having these guys pay their fair share of taxes, so Gates is spending all of his money, and most of Warren Buffet's money in the Third World. The Clintons are still doing AIDS funding in the Third World. The Clintons do have a lot of American project going on, but the bulk of their spending is still in Africa and Asia. Bezos and Musk are playing with their rockets, and the Hollywood types are all into sustainable housing, and climate change issues.

Since it is their money, they get to spend it where THEY choose, and on their favourite projects, instead of in the USA on the issues troubling Americans. The richest country in the world SHOULD be taking care of their own people first, and they're not doing it.
 
If childcare is so expensive, why dont democrats offer to do the job for less money!!!!!!!!

Why do conservative solutions always involve the lowest paid workers receiving even LESS money than they are currently making????

Then they complain about these people getting food stamps and government assistance because they're not paid enough to live on.
 
Why do conservative solutions always involve the lowest paid workers receiving even LESS money than they are currently making????
How about showing us that conservative solution, name the bill? The representative that wrote it.

I say you are making things up.

And why do Democrat solutions, always increase the price of food, clothing, housing, energy, healthcare, and education?
 
I'm only concerned with access. Since you seem unable to come up with a plan I'll go with those who have one.
Their "plan" is to line their own pockets first, then spread around what few crumbs that the bureaucracy doesn't consume to those they claim to "serve".

You really don't give a flying fuck about the "disadvantaged"....You care about virtue signaling.
 
How about universal childcare? How about paid family leave? How about universal pre-K?


I'm a man and I raised my son on my own. Including daycare, paid his doctor bills, and without child support. One a poverty type paycheck. But we also lived by our means, just like I still do. People today are to entitled, they have to start at the top.
 
Their "plan" is to line their own pockets first, then spread around what few crumbs that the bureaucracy doesn't consume to those they claim to "serve".

You really don't give a flying fuck about the "disadvantaged"....You care about virtue signaling.
What about 30 cent out of every dollar goes to the poor. Through every dollar we pay in taxes? Yes many liberals on that paycheck is happy.
 
Because I believe what is supposed to be the greatest country in the world should be able to do for the poor.

Because I'm pro-life and I understand how programs such as this can help a woman to choose life.
About 30 cent on the dollar of your tax dollars goes to the poor. The rest supports government workers. You good with that?
 
Their "plan" is to line their own pockets first, then spread around what few crumbs that the bureaucracy doesn't consume to those they claim to "serve".

You really don't give a flying fuck about the "disadvantaged"....You care about virtue signaling.

Come up with a better one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top