Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, Trump offered to by any excess comodities from farmers adversely affected by tariffs.
Socialism is never pro-family!
Yes, Trump offered to by any excess comodities from farmers adversely affected by tariffs.
Democrats on the other hand are building a socialist economy by pumping trillions into their newly created renewable heavy industry.
Certainly the $100 trillion renewable heavy industry is a fast transit bullet train rocketing towards socialism
I love how right wingers are always ready to dismiss any government program which helps poor people get a better education as both unnecessary, and humiliating. Like maternity leave with job security. Or computers for the kids to take home. Anything to help poor people will be shot down by right wingers faster than you can say "tax cuts for billionaires".
No it most certainly does not. It's a boon to working families, both in knowing that their children are well cared for, and safe while they're working .
But this idea that government services are "degrading" to the user is downright assinine. Every family wants to provide early childhood education for their children, as a head start to their schooling. But these schools are expensive.
We have a $500 per month child tax credit in Canada to help with the cost of raising children. Something that Joe Manchon refused to support. I love how billionaires with fast Italian cars have this much power over the life of every poor child in America.
The party that sold its soul for Donald Trump and Herschel Walker has forfeited any claims to morality that it thought it had.
A State can pass laws to give their citizens all this, so ask yourself why haven’t they?I love how right wingers are always ready to dismiss any government program which helps poor people get a better education as both unnecessary, and humiliating. Like maternity leave with job security. Or computers for the kids to take home. Anything to help poor people will be shot down by right wingers faster than you can say "tax cuts for billionaires".
No it most certainly does not. It's a boon to working families, both in knowing that their children are well cared for, and safe while they're working .
But this idea that government services are "degrading" to the user is downright assinine. Every family wants to provide early childhood education for their children, as a head start to their schooling. But these schools are expensive.
We have a $500 per month child tax credit in Canada to help with the cost of raising children. Something that Joe Manchon refused to support. I love how billionaires with fast Italian cars have this much power over the life of every poor child in America.
You are funny, I paraphrased your article that you linked to!No, he gave them billions. And you wonder why I dismiss your arguments
The administration's plan is expected to use two commodity support programs in the farm bill, as well as the Agriculture Department’s broad authority to stabilize the agricultural economy during times of turmoil by buying up excess supply.
How would anyone go about explaining federal central planning for grocery stores, clothing retailers, and restaurants?I imagine if I asked you to explain it, it would be about the same as my asking you to explain your daycare ideas.
Who forces minors to have sex?
Again, I quote Jesus and you can't address the scripture or my position.
You are funny, I paraphrased your article that you linked to!
You have just stated you dismiss the facts in your link!!!
Let me quote directly from your link
Yes, exactly as Shakespeare was addressing, in the passage which I quoted. Twisting holy scripture, to support evil.
Explain how it was twisted. I simply quoted it.
Yet gas cost less than $2 a gallon, food was cheap, jobs were coming back to america, troops were safely coming home, all at a fraction of the cost of what democrats have spent just this year aloneBillions in Socialism. I'd say it was on the back of taxpayers but it was done with debt.
No need.
It is clear enough what Jesus meant, and it is also clear how what He meant is very different from what you are trying to force it to mean.
Jesus never advocated theft. It is blasphemy for you to cite Him in a such a manner, and to try to suggest that He would support the evil that you are trying to promote.
Yet gas cost less than $2 a gallon, food was cheap, jobs were coming back to america, troops were safely coming home, all at a fraction of the cost of what democrats have spent just this year alone
I reject your premise.
I dont wish to go back to the democrats covid shutdownAnother post where someone is clamoring for COVID shut downs again.
