Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,496
- 83,361
- 2,635
- Thread starter
- #401
Exactly. It's his actions, not his words, which speak for him.Who testified there was no quid pro quo? Mulvaney said there was. Trump said there was.What happened concerning the Ukraine scandal?So witnesses cannot co-ordinate testimony. When are grand jury inquiries public? Why are Special Prosecutor's investigated in public?Then why not just do it? Quit hiding like a child behind closed doors.
Sunlight is the greatest cleansing agent available.
As no special prosecutor was named to investigate the Ukraine scandal, the House has to do it themselves.
Except Ukraine is not a scandal.
Trump abused the power of his office to secure a quid pro quo benefiting his re-election campaign.
That violates the law.
We have already had how many people testify, plus the President of the Ukraine publicly stating that there was no quid pro quo? Why is it you libtards cannot reconcile yourself to that little fact?
Just because Reump didn't say the magic words 'quid pro quo' does not mean there wasn't one. The magic trick still happens without incanting abracadabra.