🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Republicans think handing corporations money creates jobs.

So, you think handing money to corporations is "free Market" capitalism? The country needs revenue to operate. We have a tax code. Trump wants to change it by reducing the tax burden on corporations & rich people while throw as tidbit to the Middle Class (like Bush did). Who will make up that loss of revenue? A real free market tax cut would make sure that tax cut money is spent in the economy. Tax cuts for working people do that best. Tax cuts for your orange buddy do very little.
The country needs TAXES(liberals love the talking point revenue) to keep an overbloated bureaucracy going, where they steal from the working class then give it to liberal shmucks who don't work, and that is called liberal FAIRNESS. This is why the left wing radical terrorists are out in force, trying to brow beat the rest of US into submission. All it is doing is moving more moderates and somewhat conservative working Democrats farther, and farther right. President Trump won because of the mentally challenged liberals creating such an environment of Hate to the US.
President Trump won because we have too many dumbasses, racists & bigots in this country. Trump spews hate & you love hate. A pair made in Hell.

Its been 100 days & Trump has done shit. Where are the jobs bills? Where is the spending bill? Where is the plan to eliminate ISIS?

If helping poor people is a liberal thing, then why won't Republicans just end welfare & food stamps & every program to help poor people? See what happens to pur economy then.
Didn't take long for the shithead to get back to the liberal playbook.

View attachment 123702

Not at all, just recognizing the fact that the racists, bigots, women hating fucktards like you supported Trump.


Don't you ever get tired of lying? Ever?
UnrealDAVE is typical of liberalism.
How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#2) Sociopaths are more spontaneous and intense than other people. They tend to do bizarre, sometimes erratic things that most regular people wouldn't do. They are unbound by normal social contracts. Their behavior often seems irrational or extremely risky.
Ferguson, Baltimore, UC Berkley come to mind?
#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others.
At this point what differenced does it make whether Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans were killed by Al Qaeda?
#4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about their experiences. They wildly exaggerate things to the point of absurdity, but when they describe it to you in a storytelling format, for some reason it sounds believable at the time.
I was dodging sniper fire while landing in Bosnia, and I carry HOT SAUCE in my purse "only around black people"?
#5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and "win" at all costs. They hate to lose any argument or fight and will viciously defend their web of lies, even to the point of logical absurdity.
Even when shown over and over that the OP is wrong, he just keeps on lying.
#9) Sociopaths never apologize. They are never wrong. They never feel guilt. They can never apologize. Even if shown proof that they were wrong, they will refuse to apologize and instead go on the attack.
Just look at the OP again and how he is attacking those who have proved him wrong all the time.
#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!
Obama promising Hope and Change..
 
You don't want even know less taxes the more money you can spend ... idiot

That's your theory. However the theory does not work in practice. Every time taxes are cut, household debt skyrockets. So what that means is that people are not keeping more of what they earn. Quite the opposite, actually.
 
Fags like you will buy anything

Homophobic insults don't land anymore because it's obvious to everyone now that anyone who uses homosexuality as a means to insult others is probably a self-loathing homosexual themselves.
 
They are poor in terms of income, not in terms of what benefits they receive that allows them to live such a lifestyle in a Blue State and Blue Towns.

The welfare queen is a myth. The real welfare queens are Conservatives who use the welfare block grant to plug the deficit holes created by their dumb tax-cutting policies.
 
They don't understand that demand is what drives an economy. When you buy a song the artist makes maybe $1.50 per song, minus expenses as you note. Only if the demand is great does the artist make a lot of money. Aerosmith released a new album a couple years ago, no demand and they only sold maybe 10,000 albums. When their music was in demand they sold millions. No demand, no sales.

You give a tax break to the poor and middle class though and you DO drive up demand for products because these people spend money which drives the economy.
The question is, the demand for what?
The poor on Long Island own houses, large screen TVs and Smart Phones.
Not everyone has air conditioning and 99 cent stores are popping up everywhere.
What exactly do the poor want?

Granted, this spectrum of the poor may not fair so well in certain Red States, but what do the poor want?

A loaded question.

Just ask 'what do human beings NEED'. In sales you either fill a need or create a need and fill that need. The poor are human like any other human. Why is that not apparent to some?

It's very apparent to me and I blame both Parties for leaving minorities behind.
Most of the poor I meet want nice cars but a lot of them already lease BMWs.
I have no idea where they get the money or the credit rating.

'Most' of the poor you meet?

Come now, let us not start bloviating. We aren't talking about the handful of people you run into in your life, we are talking about tens of millions of people that find it hard to eat every day. 1/6 of children in the US go to bed hungry every night.
You want to see REAL poverty, just look at those living in Africa or South America. You libfucks and your poverty levels are so fucking bullshit. Marxism is all about taking from those that work and giving to those that don't work, till the point when those working stop, and then everyone is equal, equally poor and equally miserable.

Marxism: Not only evil in practice, but evil in theory too | Conservative Home
Sixty-five million were murdered in China – starved, hounded to suicide, shot as class traitors. Twenty million in the USSR, 2 million in North Korea, 1.7 million in Africa. The nightmare of Cambodia (2 million dead) is especially vivid. ‘Reactionaries’ were sorted out from the base population on the grounds of being supporters of the old regime, having gone to school or just for wearing glasses. They were taken to the side of paddy fields and hacked to death by teenagers.”


His view that all human relations are shaped by economics and that everything we do is measured in purely material terms reduced the individual to a pawn in a historic war between competing classes. You’re not a person – you’re either an exploiter or an alienated peasant. At least the crowned tyrants who preceded him had some sense of the value of the human soul; at least they saw their power as limited by God, tradition and a passing respect for conscience. After Marx, all these things stood in the way of progress and could be brushed aside with the swish of a signature on a death list.”
And to think that these tards who vote for Marxist policies think they will be around once this government is no longer. George Bernard Shaw, a confirmed Marxist tells what he think about the liberal scum of the Earth. You don't work you don't live.



Your Marxist Republican policies don't work, give it up. In the US the red states are the taker states while the blue states are the ones that pay the most to the federal government from which the red states suck the welfare. Peddle your Marxist crap somewhere else Lenin.
 
You don't want even know less taxes the more money you can spend ... idiot

That's your theory. However the theory does not work in practice. Every time taxes are cut, household debt skyrockets. So what that means is that people are not keeping more of what they earn. Quite the opposite, actually.
The guy said, "the more money you can spend", and you said "household debt skyrockets" so wtf are you talking about? You libs never make any sense what with all your twisting and spinning and smoking.
 
How high bitch so a kit Kat cost $50 bucks moron

A wage increase does not result in an equivalent increase in prices. Never has, never will.

exactly, just as trickle down economics has never worked and never will
Not with you at least because when you are a welfare puke the only thing trickling down is the thrill up Chris Mathews leg and his happy ending once Obama is done.
1976 minimum wage $2.10 an hour, burger, fry and small drink, 95 cents, Trans Am Firebird gold edition $6,000.
2017 minimum wage $10 an hour, burger fry and small drink, $5. If there was a Trans Am, it would be over $50,000.

You liberals are so full of your shit, that it is almost embarrassing. Not to me though, for I know how you morons think.

liberals-head-up-his-ass.jpg
 
I have news for the ultimate business man of all time, El Dumpster. Handing corporations money through tax cuts do not create jobs. Corporations hire people when they have a need.

If you want to create jobs, increase the demand for the products corporations supply. You do that by cutting taxes for the the middle & lower class people. They will spend that money & thereby increase demand.

If you want to bring those overseas corporate profits, end the tax break that said those profits aren't taxed until they bring them home.

Then, consider how much money Trump will profit from this tax break. Conflict of interest.

This tax break will not help struggling companies that make no or little profit.

It will actually reduce some investments. Corporatioins buying equipment, etc get a tax write off worth 35% & now that write off is only worth 15%.

'Trump is only helping himself.
Why is allowing people who EARN money to keep it, considered handing people money? What of my money is considered your money?

View attachment 123411 View attachment 123412

/thread
 
You don't want even know less taxes the more money you can spend ... idiot

That's your theory. However the theory does not work in practice. Every time taxes are cut, household debt skyrockets. So what that means is that people are not keeping more of what they earn. Quite the opposite, actually.


You're hilarious.

People are buying consumer goods


.
 
Rewarding the already wealthy is the Republican way

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
 
The guy said, "the more money you can spend", and you said "household debt skyrockets" so wtf are you talking about? You libs never make any sense what with all your twisting and spinning and smoking.

The problem is that you just don't understand things. When taxes are cut, that results in a drop in revenues which increases the deficit. Because of that, spending on things like health care and education are cut to make up the drop in revenues that came from the tax cuts. Those health care and education cuts then require the poor and middle class to go into debt to do things like send their kid to college or pay high medical costs. If revenues were not cut, then the funding for education and health care would be there, which means the average middle class worker doesn't have to spend a fortune sending their kid to a public college or university, and can instead spend the money they would otherwise spend on tuition, in the consumer economy which is 70% of the entire economy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top