Revisionist history focusing on 1/6 is getting louder.

[Faun]

Do you want to address all of the intel that was withheld from Steven Sund in the says leading up to 1/6 as well?

Sure, post it...

 

[Faun]

More important is her changing the rules after the riot to block any debated on fraud. No one was allowed to challenge the electoral count. That was the steal.

You're batshit insane, FruitLoops.

Not only could the Electoral Count be challenged, the Electoral Count WAS challenged.

 

[Billiejeens]

I wonder why when he - not Trump - is on tape inciting protesters to go in to the Capitol?

Were there FBI operatives dressed as Trump supporters inside the capital on January 6?

That is not even in dispute.

 

[Faun]

A government website probably has less credibility than Wikipedia or you.

LOL

Only a nut would say the government doesn't know what their own policies are.

If they don't know, FruitLoops, who does?

 

[Faun]

Well how about that, even the broken clock is right twice a day.

I am sorry, I got you confused with the other FOUR lettered idiot posting. It can be hard to keep you dummies straight, you say so much stupid shit.

LOL

If you can't keep that straight, that's a direct reflection on your own G-d given limitations.

 

[Lastamender]

There couldn’t. The DC national guard is less than half that number and no one thinks that was ever a realistic offer.

In the end, it shows that Trump knew that there was going to be violence and went ahead with everything anyway.

They thought it was legitimate enough to write a letter turning it down. That is what the mayor of DC did.

 

[Faun]

No he didn't say that, he said it went up the chain of command, who does the Sergeant at Arms report to?

Both Sergeant-at-Arms report to committees within their respective houses. Not to their house leaders.

 

[Lastamender]

LOL

Only a nut would say the government doesn't know what their own policies are.

If they don't know, FruitLoops, who does?

Only a nut would trust an illegitimate fascist administration.

 

[Lastamender]

Both Sergeant-at-Arms report to committees within their respective houses. Not to their house leaders.

Really? What are the leaders for then?

 

[Marener]

They thought it was legitimate enough to write a letter turning it down. That is what the mayor of DC did.

It wasn’t 10k soldiers. That’s the part that is unserious.

The Capitol Police asked for a quick reaction force, which was anything by quick. So although an offer was extended, they still fell through in delivering on it.

 

[OldFlame]

They didn’t think they were serious threats. It’s easy to see why they would make that assumption.

Where did you get that notion? So since 'they' didn't think they were serious threats, 'they' just chose not to share any information with the Chief of Capitol Police? And you, being the idiot you are, believe that there aren't any protocols, policies, regulations, or any other form of rules that govern what information is shared among agencies, specifically to the one person who was in charge of security for the Capitol Building on 1/6/2021? You're a special kind of stupid. I suggest you buy Steven Sund's book and read it.

 

[Faun]

Only a nut would trust an illegitimate fascist administration.

I note you didn't answer my question, FruitLoops.

 

[Faun]

Really? What are the leaders for then?

Other roles within the government.

 

[OldFlame]

Sure, post it...

So you don't know about any of it? Yet you're commenting on here as if you do.

 

[Lastamender]

It wasn’t 10k soldiers. That’s the part that is unserious.

The Capitol Police asked for a quick reaction force, which was anything by quick. So although an offer was extended, they still fell through in delivering on it.

Why are you denying an established fact?

 

[OldFlame]

Both Sergeant-at-Arms report to committees within their respective houses. Not to their house leaders.

Which committees, and who sat on them on 1/6/21?

 

[Faun]

So you don't know about any of it? Yet you're commenting on here as if you do.

Thanks for admitting you were full of shit.

 

[OldFlame]

Thanks for admitting you were full of shit.

So you're saying there was no intel about potential threats at the Capitol on 1/6/21?

 

[Lastamender]

I note you didn't answer my question, FruitLoops.

I never said they did not know their policies. I am saying their policies are destroying the country and they are well aware of it.

 

[Lastamender]

Thanks for admitting you were full of shit.

You running low? I doubt it.