Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you propose? A religion check when buying a gun?It is fuck heads like you that present a serious problem within the American citizenry.....
NO ONE, moron, is defending Islamic murderers...NO ONE.....The facts that they ARE among us and have ease in buying ANY weapon of their choosing with YOUR blessing, is the fucking problem.
I don't know how you define an assault weapon, but whatever he used sure seemed to function like one.
I don't know how you define an assault weapon, but whatever he used sure seemed to function like one.
Such is the lame ":defense" by most right wingers........They'll show their "manly prowess" by stating that such and such is or is not an "assault rifle"......Completely disregarding that ANY gun who can kill and maim over ONE HUNDRED human beings, is a fucking assaulting weapon and certainly a seldom used "defensive weapon" that these morons seem to want and need to fight off the government storm troopers..
Damn you're stupid, It never ceases to amaze me. Read your own post. WE HAVE AN OPEN SOUTHERN BORDER!!!!
By your own argument, we would have less of a chance to stop guns coming across the border than France does.
Stupidity just oozes from you and our President who thinks this wasn't an Islamic fundamentalist attack
Says the guy advocating disarming all law-biding American citizens.How many people in America have access to the weapons used by this subhuman? A lot, right? You lefties are always bitching about guns, yet this incident was the largest mass shooting in history. As such, it is not guns that are the problem. If you were capable of thinking logically, you would agree that this incident was Islamic terrorism and that IS the problem.One might think that a terrible event like this would unite Americans, but one would be wrong.
It is clear that something is wrong within Islam, that some of its adherents think murdering innocents is their religious calling.
Why did the massacre occur?
1. Radical Islam
2. Extreme hatred of gays
3. A person with noted terrorist leanings, extreme anti-gay hatred, domestic abuse and anger issues being able to buy any gun he wants
3. Unlimited access to an assault type rifle and high capacity magazines
4. No screening of patrons entering the nightclub
Hundred people shot, Fifty dead
No big deal.....we don't have to worry until there are thousands being killed
You know, every time you post is a lie since you are obviously lying about being a "rightwinger".
In A Truly Sick Moment, Trump Uses Orlando Attack To Suggest Obama Is A Secret Muslim
Donald Trump showed that he has no low as he tried to use the terrorist attack in Orlando to suggest that President Obama is a secret Muslim during an interview on Fox News.…
I don't know how you define an assault weapon, but whatever he used sure seemed to function like one.
Such is the lame ":defense" by most right wingers........They'll show their "manly prowess" by stating that such and such is or is not an "assault rifle"......Completely disregarding that ANY gun who can kill and maim over ONE HUNDRED human beings, is a fucking assaulting weapon and certainly a seldom used "defensive weapon" that these morons seem to want and need to fight off the government storm troopers..
This is your worthless presidents fault.
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.
Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR
You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......
If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,
Provide any post where I advocated disarming all law-abiding citizens
That is why you gun nuts can't be taken seriously. Any comment about background checks,restricting access to certain weapons or high capacity magazines goes right to......They want to take all our guns!
I don't know how you define an assault weapon, but whatever he used sure seemed to function like one.
Such is the lame ":defense" by most right wingers........They'll show their "manly prowess" by stating that such and such is or is not an "assault rifle"......Completely disregarding that ANY gun who can kill and maim over ONE HUNDRED human beings, is a fucking assaulting weapon and certainly a seldom used "defensive weapon" that these morons seem to want and need to fight off the government storm troopers..
This is your worthless presidents fault.
I know....If only he would say "Radical Islam" none of this would have happened
2. Grow Up, learn something about Western Civilization and the concept of Freedom which is promotes, and understand that Islamism is Authoritarian Totalitarianism just like Communism and Fascism. And then accept the reality that Islamism is at War With Us.
2. Grow Up, learn something about Western Civilization and the concept of Freedom which is promotes, and understand that Islamism is Authoritarian Totalitarianism just like Communism and Fascism. And then accept the reality that Islamism is at War With Us.
Follow your OWN fucked up logic then........If Islamists (according to your racist and xenophobic mentality) are at war with us.....it is your screwed up policies that are actually help to ARM them.
I'm not ignoring the weapons effectiveness.Killed 50 people with it....THAT is some assault weapon
That weapon didn't kill 50 people by itself, now did it?
Imagine if he had only a revolver, can you imagine the number of people the shooter wouldn't have killed?It is apparently a fact that you are blaming the weapon.So!According the ATF he bought a long gun and a handgun just days ago.
So, it's apparently fact. Do what you want with the info.
Do what you want with the info.
I don't think it's possible to only blame the weapon, that doesn't' make sense. To ignore the weapons effectiveness is asinine.
Again! He was a known radical. The Government failed in their responsibility.
The weapon was manufactured for the effectiveness.
You choose to curtail my rights instead of addressing the individual.
You anti 2nd Amendment clowns make me laugh. There are over 300 million privately owned firearms in the US, but the areas with the most restrictive laws suffer the worst gun violence. Seems like you want more gun violence, like under the Clinton restrictions. My question is why?
You anti 2nd Amendment clowns make me laugh. There are over 300 million privately owned firearms in the US, but the areas with the most restrictive laws suffer the worst gun violence. Seems like you want more gun violence, like under the Clinton restrictions. My question is why?
Of course you'd ask "why"......that's because you're an idiot and you're not shy about showing it......
The areas with the MOST restrictive gun laws (according to you) are in large urban areas (and that for idiots like you means MORE people)...ergo, these urban areas WILL have more violence than some little dung-filled, small town in Idaho or Montana.
So tell us ma'am, what piece of paper will stop people from shooting each other? Your gun free zones are a failure. Placing undo burdens on ordinary citizens and their constitutional right to carry has failed. During Clintons idiot gun ban and restrictions, shootings went up, so what is the magic elixir this time?
I live in Kansas City. We have Constitutional Carry. I remember when it passed and all the fear mongering ladies, such as yourself, predicted wild west shootouts every day. Never happened.
